Education and Parenting in the Philippines

  • Liane Peña AlampayEmail author
  • Aileen S. Garcia
Part of the Young People and Learning Processes in School and Everyday Life book series (YPLP, volume 3)


Filipino families place a high value on children’s educational achievement. Providing for children’s education is a primary goal of Filipino parents and conversely, children consider educational success as the means by which they can meet filial obligations and parental expectations. Interdependence in Filipino families is such that education-related decisions and behaviors reflect on family rather than individual welfare. This chapter presents the current Philippine education system and its challenges vis-a-vis this cultural context of the Filipino family, focusing particularly on families belonging to the lower socioeconomic class. Major education reforms known as the K-12 law occurred in 2013, expanding basic education to 13 years, but issues with low quality and ineffective resource allocation remain. Poverty has significant effects on student enrollment and completion rates, especially at the secondary or high school level. Given socioeconomic constraints, Filipino parents employ strategies to meet their family’s education aspirations, such as overseas migration.


  1. Abadzi, H. (2013). Education for all in low-income countries: A crucial role for cognitive scientists. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioral Science, 3, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alampay, L. P. (2014). Parenting in the Philippines. In Parenting across cultures: Childrearing, motherhood and fatherhood in non-western cultures (pp. 459–474). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Apilado, D. (2008). A history of paradox: Some notes on Philippine public education in the 20th century. In A. B. I. Bernardo (Ed.), The paradox of Philippine education and reform: Social science perspectives. Philippine Social Science Council: Quezon City, Philippines.Google Scholar
  4. Arguillas, M. J. B., & Williams, L. (2010). The impact of parents’ overseas employment on educational outcomes of Filipino children. The International Migration Review, 44, 300–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asis, M., & Ruiz-Marave, C. (2013). Leaving a legacy: Parental migration and school outcomes among young children in the Philippines. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 22, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  7. Bodovski, K. (2010). Parental practices and educational achievement: Social class, race, and habitus. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chao, R., & Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Social conditions and applied parenting (Vol. 4, pp. 59–93). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Chaudhury, N., & Okamura, Y. (2012). Conditional cash transfers and school enrollment: Impact of the conditional cash transfer program in the Philippines. World Bank Social Protection Policy Note No. 6. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from
  10. Commission on Filipinos Overseas. (n.d.). Statistical profile of registered Filipino emigrants. Retrieved on March 30, 2019 from
  11. Constantino, R. (1970). The mis-education of the Filipino. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1, 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. David, C., & Albert, J. R. (2012). Primary education: Barriers to entry and bottlenecks to completion. PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2012-07. Makati City, Philippines: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1993). Parent-school involvement during the early adolescent years. Teachers College Record, 94, 568–587.Google Scholar
  14. Enriquez, V. (1994). From colonial to liberation psychology. Manila: De La Salle University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Garcia, A. S. (2018). Parental involvement among low-income Filipinos: A phenomenological inquiry. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  16. Garo-Santiago, M., Mansukhani, R., & Resureccion, R. (2009). Adolescent identity in the context of the Filipino family. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 42, 175–193.Google Scholar
  17. Institute of Family Life and Children’s Studies. (2016). Beyond compliance: A look into the behavioral and social outcomes of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program. Manila: Philippine Women’s University.Google Scholar
  18. Lardizabal, A. S. (1991). Pioneer American teachers and Philippine education. Quezon City: Phoenix Publishing House Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liwag, M. E., De la Cruz, A., & Macapagal, M. (1998). How we raise our daughters and sons: Child-rearing and gender socialization in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 31, 1–46.Google Scholar
  21. Maligalig, D., Caoili-Rodriguez, R., Martinez, A., & Cuevas, S. (2010). Education outcomes in the Philippines. ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 199. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  22. Medina, B. (2001). The Filipino family (2nd ed.). Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
  23. Montemayor, M. T. (2018). Class size affects students’ learning: DepEd. Philippine News Agency. March 19, 2018. Retreived from
  24. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. (n.d.). The K to 12 basic education program. Retrieved March 30, 2019 from
  25. Okabe, M. (2013). Where does Philippine education go? The “K to 12” program and reform of Philippine basic education. IDE Discussion Paper Series No. 425. Chiba, Japan: Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO).Google Scholar
  26. Parreñas, R. S. (2006). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Peterson, J. T. (1993). Generalized family exchange: A case from the Philippines. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 570–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2015). 2013 Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS): Final report. Manila: Author. Retrieved from
  29. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2017). 2016 Statistical indicators on Philippine development. Retrieved March 30, 2019 from
  30. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2018a). Annual poverty indicators survey 2017. Manila: Author.Google Scholar
  31. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2018b). SDG watch Philippines. Retrieved March 30, 2019 from
  32. Reyes, M. L., & Galang, A. J. R. (2009). Motivational and social aspects of the Filipino college experience. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 42, 213–235.Google Scholar
  33. Symaco, L. P. (2013). Geographies of social exclusion: Education access in the Philippines. Comparative Education, 49, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabbada-Rungduin, T., Abulon, E. L., Fetalvero, L., & Suatengco, R. (2014). Exploring parental involvement and teachers’ activities in early literacy development. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 3, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence. Retrieved from
  36. UNICEF. (2018). Situation analysis of children in the Philippines. Manila, Philippines: National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) and UNICEF Philippines.Google Scholar
  37. World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators database. Retrieved March 30, 2019 from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ateneo de Manila UniversityQuezon CityPhilippines
  2. 2.South Dakota State UniversityBrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations