Advertisement

Bridging the Cultural Divide: Applying Critical Thinking in TNE Partnerships

Chapter
  • 116 Downloads

Abstract

It is often reported by lecturing staff working with overseas partners that non-European students seem to lack the capability in critical thinking (Huang 2008; Durkin 2011; Zhang 2017; Fox 1996) at final year degree and masters level required by UK QAA benchmarks (The Quality Assurance Agency 2016). Concerns are also expressed that overseas staff fail to sufficiently value the importance of critical thinking. This results in assignments that fail to provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate critical thinking or marking that gives disproportionate marks to knowledge retrieval rather than critical thinking. This chapter examines these assertions in the context of degree and masters’ level courses in computing and computer-related courses. It suggests that there can be real problems. However, by analysing what we actually mean by critical thinking, and examining how relationships with partners are managed, benchmark programme learning outcomes can be satisfied. There are hidden costs involved in managing TNE partnerships that are often overlooked by provider institutions. If these are not accounted for, programmes can be compromised.

Keywords

Critical thinking Academic culture TNE management Academic quality 

References

  1. Bolton P (2012) Education: historical statistics. House of Commons Library, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. De Bary W (1998) Asian values and human rights: a confucian communitarian perspective. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Dijkstra E (1989) On the cruelty of really teaching computer science. Commun ACM 32(12):1397–1404Google Scholar
  4. Durkin K (2011) Adapting to western norms of critical argumentation and debate. In: Cortazzi JL (ed) Researching Chinese learners. Palgrave Macmillan, New Yorl, pp 274–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. English M (2013) Critical thinking in the management of technology. In: Research starters: business (Online Edition). 29 Nov 2018. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26db%3ders%26AN%3d89163631%26site%3deds-live&group=trial
  6. Ennis R (1996) Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox C (1996) Listening to the other. Mapping intercultural communication in postcolonial educational consultancies. In: R. P. (ed) Social cartography. Mapping ways of seeing social and educational change. Garland Publishing, New York, pp 291–306Google Scholar
  8. Hammersley-Fletcher L, Hanley C (2016) The use of critical thinking in higher education in relation to the international student: shifting policy and practice. B Educ Res J 42(6):978–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang R (2008) Critical thinking: discussion from chinese postgraduate international students and their lecturers. The Higher Education Academy, Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Network: Enhancing Series: Internationalisation: The Higher Education Academy, Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Network: Enhancing Series: InternationalisationGoogle Scholar
  10. Illich I (1971) Deschooling society. Calder and B, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Mason M (2008) Critical thinking and learning. In: Mason M (ed) Critical thinking and learning. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McMillan C (2018) ‘I’ve learned to question everything’: critical thinking, or, the pedagogical logic of late capitalism. J Crit Educ Policy Stud 3–29Google Scholar
  13. McPeck J (1981) Critical thinking and education. Martin Robertson, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Nussbaum M (2010) The liberal arts are not elitist. Chron High Educ 56(25)Google Scholar
  15. Paul R (1982) Teaching critical thinking in the ‘Strong Sense’: a focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal Log Newsl 4(2)Google Scholar
  16. Rosen C (2015) A philosophical comparison of chinese and european models of computer science education. (A discussion paper). In: Software engineering education going agile. Springer, Zwickau Germany, pp 9–14Google Scholar
  17. Ryan J, Louie K (2008) False dichotomy? “Western” and “Confucian” concepts of scholarship and learning. In: Mason M (ed) Critical thinking and learning. Wiley, pp 65–78Google Scholar
  18. Schön D (1995) The reflective practitioner. Arena, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  19. Siegel H (1990) Educating reason: rationality, critical thinking and education. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. The Quality Assurance Agency (2016) QAA subject benchmark statements. QAA: https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/sbs-computing-16.pdf?sfvrsn=26e1f781_12
  21. Tu W (1996) Confucian traditions in east asian modernity: moral education and economic culture in Japan and the four mini dragons. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang T (2017) Why do Chinese postgraduates struggle with critical thinking? Some clues from the higher education curriculum in China. J Furth High Educ 41(6):857–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Passerelle SystemsNewcastle under LymeEngland

Personalised recommendations