Skip to main content

A Neuroimaging Study of How ICT-Enabled Interruptions Induce Mental Stress

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 32))

  • 1235 Accesses

Abstract

In modern society, information and communication technologies (ICTs) provide individuals with social connectivity and facilitate their task execution either in daily life or work. While ICTs bring about numerous benefits, the technologies can expose individuals to frequent interruptions which disrupt thinking processes and potentially cause mental stress. Even though Information Systems research has investigated the effect of interruptions on stress, the neural mechanism underlying how ICT-enabled interruptions induce individuals’ mental stress remains to be further revealed. Accordingly, this neuroimaging study aims to examine the neural activation associated with mental stress in response to ICT-enabled interruptions by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). Furthermore, this research distinguishes the neural activation patterns with regard to quantity and task relevancy of ICT-enabled interruptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kessler, M. (2007). Fridays go from casual to e-mail free. USA Today.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson, T., Dawson, R., & Wilson, D. (2001). The cost of email interruption. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 5(1), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson, C. (2005). Meet the life hackers. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benbunan-fich, R., & Truman, G. E. (2009). Multitasking with laptops during meetings. Communications of the ACM, 52(2), 139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vonnegut, B., & Youtube, O. (2011). Growing up digital, wired for distraction. The New York Times, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galluch, P. S., Grover, V., & Thatcher, J. B. (2015). Interrupting the workplace: Examining stressors in an information technology context. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins, J. L., Anderson, B. B., Vance, A., Kirwan, C. B., & Eargle, D. (2016). More harm than good? How messages that interrupt can make us vulnerable. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 880–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, D., & Vertegaal, R. (2004). Using mental load for managing interruptions in physiologically attentive user interfaces. In CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1513–1516). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Züger, M., & Fritz, T. (2015). Interruptibility of software developers and its prediction using psycho-physiological sensors. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2981–2990). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, D., Hart, J., & Vertegaal, R. (2007). Towards a physiological model of user interruptability. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 439–451). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coraggio, L. (1990). Deleterious effects of intermittent interruptions on the task performance of knowledge workers: A laboratory investigation. Reproduction.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher, C. D. (1998). Effects of external and internal interruptions on boredom at work: Two studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(5), 503–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, X., Ye, S., & Teo, H. H. (2014). Effects of interruptions on creative thinking. In Proceedings of ICIS 2014 (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (‘absorption’), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jett, Q. R., & George, J. M. (2003). Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organization life. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 494–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Okhuysen, G. A. (2001). Structuring change: Familiarity and formal interventions in problem-solving groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 794–808.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-Products and e-Services. Omega, 32(6), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mullarkey, S., Jackson, P. R., Wall, T. D., Wilson, J. R., & Grey, S. (1997). The impact of technology characteristics and job control on worker mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rohleder, N., Wolf, J. M., Maldonado, E. F., & Kirschbaum, C. (2006). The psychosocial stress-induced increase in salivary alpha-amylase is independent of saliva flow rate. Psychophysiology, 43(6), 645–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Beehr, T. A., Jex, S. M., Stacy, B. A., & Murray, M. A. (2000). Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(4), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fenlason, K. J., & Beehr, T. A. (1994). Social support and occupational stress: Effects of talking to others. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(2), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological review, 104(1), 3–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aziz, M. (2003). Organizational stress: A review and critique of theory, research, and applications (Book). Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 28(1), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, T. W. (2006). Personality as risk and resilience in physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 227–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cooper, C. L. (1998). Job stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Edwards, J. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 292–339.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dedovic, K., Renwick, R., Mahani, N. K., Engert, V., Lupien, S. J., & Pruessner, J. C. (2005). The Montreal imaging stress task: Using functional imaging to investigate the effects of perceiving and processing psychosocial stress in the human brain. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 30(5), 319–325.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kern, S., Oakes, T. R., Stone, C. K., McAuliff, E. M., Kirschbaum, C., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Glucose metabolic changes in the prefrontal cortex are associated with HPA axis response to a psychosocial stressor. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33, 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pruessner, J. C. (2004). Dopamine release in response to a psychological stress in humans and its relationship to early life maternal care: A positron emission tomography study using [11C] raclopride. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(11), 2825–2831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pruessner, J. C., Dedovic, K., Khalili-Mahani, N., Engert, V., Pruessner, M., Buss, C., et al. (2008). Deactivation of the limbic system during acute psychosocial stress: Evidence from positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Biological Psychiatry, 63(2), 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, J., Korczykowski, M., Rao, H., Fan, Y., Pluta, J., Gur, R. C., et al. (2007). Gender difference in neural response to psychological stress. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(3), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Davidson, R. J., Jackson, D. C., & Kalin, N. H. (2000). Emotion, plasticity, context and regulation: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 890–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dedovic, K., Duchesne, A., Andrews, J., Engert, V., & Pruessner, J. C. (2009). The brain and the stress axis: The neural correlates of cortisol regulation in response to stress. NeuroImage, 47(3), 864–871 (Elsevier Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Seo, S.-H., & Lee, J.-T. (2010). Stress and EEG. INTECH Open Access Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ryu, K., & Myung, R. (2005). Evaluation of mental workload with a combined measure based on physiological indices during a dual task of tracking and mental arithmetic. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 991–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Harmony, T., Fernández, T., Silva, J., Bernal, J., Díaz-Comas, L., Reyes, A., et al. (1996). EEG delta activity: An indicator of attention to internal processing during performance of mental tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 24, 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Papousek, I., & Schulter, G. (2002). Covariations of EEG asymmetries and emotional states indicate that activity at frontopolar locations is particularly affected by state factors. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Desmond, J. E., & Glover, G. H. (2002). Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: Statistical power analyses. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 118(2), 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1, R-253-000-120-112.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hock-Hai Teo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, Z., Teo, HH. (2020). A Neuroimaging Study of How ICT-Enabled Interruptions Induce Mental Stress. In: Davis, F., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A., Fischer, T. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28144-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics