Skip to main content

Proto-Immersive Discourse and the ‘Theatrical Condition’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Immersive Embodiment

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology ((PSPT))

  • 550 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter historically situates the contemporary yen for enveloping aesthetics as contiguous with the concern of reconciling a departure that art critic Michael Fried had identified between the absorptive and theatrical artworks in Art and Objecthood (1967). Fried’s writing on theatricality has been a common reference point for debates on liveness and duration in performance art. But I argue that Fried’s polemic should be re-read as proto-immersive discourse. The defining features of theatres of mislocalized sensation are consonant with a phenomenon that Fried had opposed—namely the ‘theatrical condition’. Admixtures of artistic/scientific form are encompassing the ‘theatrical condition’, affording new spaces for open-ended performance forms that seek to alter a beholder’s way of perceiving and transition the focus from what an artwork ‘says’, to what it ‘does’. With this shift, I examine the role of doubt, perplexity and ‘sense uncertainty’ in the gallery-based works of Catherine Richards, Carsten Höller and Lundahl & Seitl that call into question our body parts as ‘inalienable entities’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, A., and M. Puchner. 2007. Against Theatre Creative Destructions on the Modernist Stage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Performance Interventions.

    Google Scholar 

  • An Extra-Sensory Journey Around the Royal Academy. 2014. BBC Arts. Uploaded 21 May 2014. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/4QLmql9rFDD7Vr1CwyS5PsQ/an-extra-sensory-journey-around-the-royal-academy. Accessed 23 Feb 2018.

  • Barish, Jonas. 1981. The Anti-theatrical Prejudice. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Freire. 2015. Carsten Höller: Decision. Time Out. Uploaded 11 June 2015. https://www.timeout.com/london/art/carsten-hoeller-decision. Accessed 23 Feb 2018.

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 2005. The Conspiracy of Art. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu, Jill, Mary Roberts, and Toni Ross (eds.). 2000. Refracting Vision: Essays on the Writings of Michael Fried. Sydney: Power Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behold. Oxford Dictionaries. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/behold. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

  • Bishop, Claire. 2004. Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics. October 110: 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Installation: A Critical History. London: Tate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleeker, Maaike. 2008. Visuality in the Theatre: The Locus of Looking. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Performance Interventions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. David, and Richard A. Grusin. 2000. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002 [1998]. Relational Aesthetics, trans. Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods with the participation of Mathieu Copeland. Dijon: Les Presses du Reel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Postproduction: Culture as Screenplay: How Art Reprograms the World. New York: Lukas & Sternberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, Victor. 1986. The End of Art Theory: Criticism and Post-modernity. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calleja, Gordon. 2011. In-Game: From Immersion to Incorporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, Patricia Ticineto with Jean Halley. 2007. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpitt, Frances. 1990. Minimal Art: The Critical Perspective. London: UMI Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, Jonathan. 1990. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur C. 1984. The End of Art. In The Death of Art, ed. Berel Lang. New York: Haven Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Tracy C., and Thomas Postlewait (eds.). 2003. Theatricality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vignemont, Frédérique. 2018. Mind the Body: An Exploration of Bodily Self-awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, Denis. 1995 [1757]. Entretiens sur le Fils naturel. In Diderot et le theatre. ‘Preface’ and notes by Alain M.nil. Paris: Pocket.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995 [1758]. Discours de la poésie dramatique. In Diderot et le theatre. ‘Preface’ and notes by Alain M.nil. Paris: Pocket.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984 [1796]. Diderot, Essais sur la peinture: Salons de 1759, 1761, 1763 (Essais sur la peinture was first published in 1796). Text compiled and presented by Gita May. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Steve. 2007. Digital Performance: A History of New Media in Theater, Dance, Performance Art, and Installation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dreams of Dalí: 360º Video. The Dali Museum YouTube Channel. Published 21 January 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1eLeIocAcU. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

  • Eccleston, Christopher. 2015. Embodied: The Psychology of Physical Sensation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2008. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics, trans. Saskya Iris Jain. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, Michael. 1998 [1967]. Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, Oliver. 2003. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion, trans. Gloria Custance. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.L., and E.H. Gombrich (eds.). 1973. Illusion in Nature and Art. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, Erin. 2010. Theatre and Feeling. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, Liam. 2017. Creating in the Dark: Conceptualising Different Darknesses in Contemporary Practice. In Theatre in the Dark: Shadow, Gloom and Blackout in Contemporary Theatre, ed. Adam Alston and Martin Welton. London, UK: Methuen Drama Engage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Amelia. 2008. Live Art in Art History: A Paradox? In The Cambridge Companion to Performance Studies, ed. Tracy C. Davis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaprow, Allan. 1966. Assemblages, Environments and Happenings. New York: Harry N. Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, David. 2014. Body Ownership and Beyond: Connections Between Cognitive Neuroscience and Linguistic Typology. Consciousness and Cognition 26: 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, Baz, and Helen Nicholson (eds.). 2011. Research Methods in Theatre and Performance. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, Grant H. 2013a [2004]. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley and London: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Conversation Pieces: The Role of Dialogue in Socially Engaged Art. In Theory in Contemporary Art Since 1985, 2nd ed., ed. Zoya Kucor and Simon Leung. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Rosalind. 1987. Theories of Art After Minimalism and Pop. In Discussions in Contemporary Culture, ed. Hal Foster. Seattle: Bay Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackner, J.R. 1988. Some Proprioceptive Influences on the Perceptual Representation of Body Shape and Orientation. Brain 111: 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lailach, Michael. 2007. Land Art, ed. Uta Grosenick. Köln and London: Taschen. Basic Art Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, Graham. 2009. Seven Ways to Fool Your Sense of Touch: Tactile Illusions 1: The Aristotle Illusion. New Scientist. Uploaded 11 March 2009. https://www.newscientist.com/round-up/tactile-illusions/. Accessed 18 Aug 2014.

  • Linden, David E.J., Ulrich Kallenbach, Armin Heineckeô, Wolf Singer, and Rainer Goebel. 1999. The Myth of Upright Vision. A Psychophysical and Functional Imaging Study of Adaptation to Inverting Spectacles. Perception 28: 469–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundahl & Seitl. Symphony of a Missing Room. http://www.lundahl-seitl.com/work/symphony-of-a-missing-room. Accessed 19 Feb 2018.

  • Machon, Josephine. 2009. (Syn)aesthetics: Redefining Visceral Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Immersive Theatres: Intimacy and Immediacy in Contemporary Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magritte VR. BDH. https://www.bdh.net/immersive/magritte-vr. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

  • Miller, Jason. 2016. Activism vs. Antagonism: Socially Engaged Art from Bourriaud to Bishop and Beyond. In Field (3). http://field-journal.com/issue-3/activism-vs-antagonism-socially-engaged-art-from-bourriaud-to-bishop-and-beyond. Accessed 19 Feb 2018.

  • Munster, Anna. 2006. Materializing New Media Embodiment in Information Aesthetics. New England: Dartmouth College Press/University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Night Cafe: A VR Tribute to Vincent Van Gogh—Oculus Rift. EkosVR YouTube Channel. Published 4 June 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Si-pImnlFZs. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

  • Obrist, Hans Ulrich. 2012. Edge, A to Z (Pars Pro Toto). In How Is the Internet Changing the Way You Think? The Net’s Impact on Our Minds and Future, ed. John Brockman. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebellato, Dan, and Kim Solga. 2018. Katie Mitchell and the Politics of Naturalist Theatre. In The Theatre of Katie Mitchell, ed. Benjamin Fowler, 4×45, 39–71. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Catherine. 1993. Virtual Body: Statement from the Show Eldorado Centrum, Antwerp 1993. Emailed by the artist, 19 December 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. ‘Catherine Richards, Hybrid Bodies Presentation’. YouTube. Uploaded 24 June 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayF-c_2C00E. Accessed 19 Jan 2018.

  • ———. 2018. Virtual Body: Artist Statement. Catherine Richards’ website. http://www.catherinerichards.ca/artwork2/Virtual_statement.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2018.

  • Ridout, Nicholas. 2006. Stage Fright, Animals and Other Theatrical Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R.S. 2015. Carsten Höller: Playtime. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/blogs/prospero/2015/06/carsten-h-ller.

  • Schechner, Richard. 1994 [1973]. Environmental Theater, new expanded ed. New York: Applause. The Applause Acting Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Joanne. 2016. Intermedial Praxis and Practice as Research: ‘Doing-Thinking’ in Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 2009. The Corporeal Turn: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, William C. 2009. This Is My Body: An Existential Analysis of the Living Body. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Starry Night Stereo VR Experience. VR Motion Magic YouTube Channel. Published 28 November 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7Dt9ziemYA. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

  • Stratton, G.M. 1896. Some Preliminary Experiments on Vision Without Inversion of the Retinal Image. Psychological Review 3: 611–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1897. Vision Without Inversion of the Retinal Image. Psychological Review 4: 341–360, 463–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, Edward. 1993. Minimalism: Origins. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Symphony of a Missing Room’: Lundahl & Seitl. 2017. Kochi-Muziris Biennale YouTube Channel. Uploaded 25 February 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jW26RGIlFpk. Accessed 21 Feb 2018.

  • Todolí, Vicente. 2016. Carsten Höller: Doubt. Exhibition programme, Pirelli HangarBicocca, 7 April–31 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufnell, Ben. 2006. Land Art. London: New York: Tate. Distributed in the U.S. by Harry N. Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Brand, Jessica. 2015. Tino Sehgal: Art as Immaterial Commodity. Saarbrücken, Deutschland: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hantelmann, Dorothea. 2006. I. In Carsten Höller: Test Site. London: Tate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, Steve. 2010. The Secret Life of Plays. London: Nick Hern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Samuel. 2004. Theatricality as a Medium. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welton, Martin. 2011. Feeling Theatre. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, Fiona. 2002. Mapping the Terrain: A Survey of Site-Specific Performance in Britain. New Theatre Quarterly 18 (2): 140–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahm, Olivier. 2013. Carsten Höller: The Last Avant-Garde. Purple Magazine, F/W 2013 issue 20. http://purple.fr/magazine/fw-2013-issue-20/carsten-holler/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Jarvis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jarvis, L. (2019). Proto-Immersive Discourse and the ‘Theatrical Condition’. In: Immersive Embodiment. Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27971-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics