Skip to main content

Introduction: Ethical Public Leadership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Bromell asks: Who do I need to be and become, and how do I need to behave, to work well in public life with people who want and value different things? This introductory chapter sets out the challenge of public leadership when working with diverse publics. It distinguishes between leaders and leadership and summarises some recent thinking about public leadership and New Public Management/New Public Governance managerialism in public administration. Bromell welcomes a recent shift of focus in public policy education from training analysts to cultivating leadership, introduces the use of competencies and competency frameworks, and proposes to draw on political theory and social ethics to frame a limited set of interpersonal competencies (soft skills) as ethical competencies (hard soft skills) for public leadership in contexts of pluralism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Section 4.1 explores how the West came, through conflict and violence, to respect individual liberty in the political management of difference, specifically religious difference.

  2. 2.

    The Fragile States Index 2018 (Fund for Peace, 2018) identifies “high” and “very high” alert countries. See also World Bank (2018).

  3. 3.

    Within political liberalism, there are, of course, debates about how best to manage diversity, particularly ethno-cultural diversity. Five basic models are: nationalism; assimilationism; liberal pluralism (“the melting pot”); integration; and multiculturalism (“the tossed salad”). See further Levey (2007) and Kukathas (2012). Some theorists distinguish multiculturalism from interculturalism, but as Levey (2012) shows, this is a distinction without a difference.

  4. 4.

    See, for example, Gronn (2002), Currie, Grubnic, and Hodges (2011), Currie and Lockett (2011), Crosby and Bryson (2005, 2010), and Ospina (2016).

  5. 5.

    On New Public Management, see Hood (1991), Dunleavy and Hood (1994), Larbi (2003), Bromell (2017, pp. 26–29). On the New Zealand system of public management and its evolution, see Schick (1996), Gill (2011), Ryan and Gill (2011). On New Public Governance, see Osborne (2006) and Rhodes (2016).

  6. 6.

    On June 26, 2019, the New Zealand Government announced wide-ranging reforms to unify the public service, with legislation to be introduced to repeal the State Sector Act 1988 and replace it with a new Public Service Act.

  7. 7.

    On leadership and public value theory, see especially Moore (1995, 2013), Bozeman (2007), Bozeman and Johnson (2015), Meynhardt (2009), Benington (2015), Bryson, Crosby, and Bloomberg (2014), Bryson, Crosby, and Bloomberg (2015), Crosby, ‘t Hart, and Torfing (2017), Hartley, Alford, and Hughes (2015), Van Quaquebeke, Graf, Kerschreiter, Schuh, and van Dick (2014) and Crosby and Bryson (2005).

  8. 8.

    Cf. Bass and Steidlmeier (1999), who suggested that the ethics of leadership rests on three pillars: “(1) the moral character of the leader; (2) the ethical legitimacy of the values embedded in the leaders [sic.] vision, articulation, and program which followers either embrace or reject; and (3) the morality of the processes of social ethical choice and action that leaders and followers engage in and collectively pursue” (p. 182).

  9. 9.

    On Fukuyama’s proposal, see further Sect. 6.2.1.1.

  10. 10.

    Examples of how interpersonal competencies are being incorporated into public policy education include the public policy and public/global leadership programmes at Fukuyama’s own Stanford University (Stanford University, n.d.), the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University (Harvard Kennedy School, 2018), the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan (University of Michigan, 2011), Herzing College, Canada (Herzing College, 2017), and the Australia New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG, 2018).

  11. 11.

    Competency or capabilities frameworks do not necessarily imply or require individualistic or “heroic” models of leadership. They need not focus on individual leader development at the expense of leadership as a distributed relational process. See further Bolden and Gosling (2006).

  12. 12.

    On competencies and public service, see further Cooper (1987), Ellström (1997), Virtanen (2000), Bowman, West, Berman, and Van Wart (2016), Macaulay and Lawton (2006). New Zealand’s Policy Project, an initiative of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, has developed a “policy skills framework” (DPMC, 2019; Washington & Mintrom, 2018). While oriented towards policy analysis and advice of the more traditional, economics-dominated sort, it does include competencies in engagement and collaboration, agility and political savvy.

  13. 13.

    Macaulay (2009) argues that while ethical public leadership may start with codes of professional standards and ethics, it does not end there: “Compliance mechanisms such as codes of conduct may certainly help administrators behave in an ethical manner (or at least in a manner preconceived as ethical by the people who instituted the compliance mechanisms), but this will not necessarily make anybody make moral choices” (p. 34). See also Macaulay and Arjoon (2013).

  14. 14.

    Macaulay and Lawton (2006, p. 702) note a convergence between virtues and competencies: “Competencies embody certain virtues, whereas virtues require competence in order to successfully implement them.” Virtues, they argue, must have a fundamentally practical application and be publicly demonstrated and measured, or they are effectively meaningless (p. 708).

  15. 15.

    See, for example, Peterson and Seligman (2004), who classify 24 specific strengths under six broad virtues that consistently emerge across history and culture: wisdom, courage, humanity, justice, temperance and transcendence.

  16. 16.

    By “seeing”, Jackson and Parry include watching movies and TV shows that illustrate effective and ineffective leadership. “Seeing” also involves observation of others’ leadership.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bromell, D. (2019). Introduction: Ethical Public Leadership. In: Ethical Competencies for Public Leadership. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27943-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics