Skip to main content

Types of Mimetics for the Design of Intelligent Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1026))

Abstract

Mimetic design means using a source in the natural or artificial worlds as an inspiration for technological solutions. It is based around the abstraction of the relevant operating principles in a source domain. This means that one must be able to identify the correct level of analysis and extract the relevant patterns. How this should be done is based on the type of source. From a mimetic perspective, if the design goal is intelligent technology, an obvious source of inspiration is human information processing, which we have called cognitive mimetics. This article offers some conceptual clarification on the nature of cognitive mimetics by contrasting it with biomimetics in the context of intelligent technology. We offer a two-part ontology for cognitive mimetics, suggest an approach and discuss possible implications for AI in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Holyoak, K.J., Thagard, P.: Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kujala, T., Saariluoma, P.: Cognitive mimetics for designing intelligent technologies. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saariluoma, P., Kujala, T., Karvonen, A., Ahonen M.: Cognitive mimetics - main ideas. In: Proceedings on the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI), pp. 202–206. The Steering Committee of the World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saariluoma, P., Karvonen, A., Wahlström, M., Happonen, K., Puustinen, R., Kujala, T.: Challenge of tacit knowledge in acquiring information in cognitive mimetics. In: Karwowski, W., Ahram, T. (eds.) Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2019. IHSI 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 903. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dym, C.L., Brown, D.C.: Engineering Design: Representation and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.H.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Oxford (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saariluoma, P.: Chess Players’ Thinking. Routledge, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duncker, K.: On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, vol. 58, pp. 1–113 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wertheimer, M.: Productive Thinking. Greenwood, Westport (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fayemi, P.E., Wanieck, K., Zollfrank, C., Maranzana, N., Aoussat, A.: Biomimetics: process, tools and practice. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 12(1) (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drack, M., Limpinsel, M., de Bruyn, G., Nebelsick, J., Betz, O.: Towards a theoretical clarification of biomimetics using conceptual tools from engineering design. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 13 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vincent, J.F., Bogatyreva, O.A., Bogatyrev, N.R., Bowyer, A., Pahl, A.K.: Biomimetics: its practice and theory. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 3, 471–482 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Floridi, L.: The logic of design as a conceptual logic of information. Mind. Mach. 27(3), 495–519 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonser, R.H.C.: Patented biologically-inspired technological innovations: a twenty year view. J. Bionic Eng. 3(1), 39–41 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lepora, N.F., Verschure, P., Prescott, T.J.: The state of the art in biomimetics. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 8 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kar, A.K.: Bio inspired computing–a review of algorithms and scope of applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 59, 20–32 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McCulloch, W.S., Pitts, W.: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 5(4), 115–133 (1943)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J. Physiol. 195(1), 215–243 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidhuber, J.: Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw. 61, 85–117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hebb, D.O.: The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. Psychology Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Summerfield, C., Botvinick, M.: Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence. Neuron 95, 245–258 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Turing, A.M.: On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem. In: Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 42, pp. 230–265, July 1936

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. De Groot, A.D.: Thought and Choice in Chess. Mounton, The Hague (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Philos. Psychol. 407 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buchanan, B.G., Davis, R., Feigenbaum, E.A.: Expert systems: a perspective from computer science. In: Ericsson, K.A, Hoffman, R.R., Kozbelt, A., Williams, A.M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 2nd edn., pp. 84–104. Cambridge University Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lake, B.M., Ullman, T.D., Tenenbaum, J.B., Gershman, S.J.: Building machines that learn and think like people. Behav. Brain Sci. 40 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nagel, J., Schmidt, L., Born, W.: Establishing analogy categories for bio-inspired design. Designs 2(4), 47 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., Qin, Y.: An integrated theory of the mind. Psychol. Rev. 111(4), 1036 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Price, C.J., Friston, K.J.: Functional ontologies for cognition: the systematic definition of structure and function. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22(3–4), 262–275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saariluoma, P.: Foundational Analysis: Presuppositions in Experimental Psychology. Routledge, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ericsson, K.A., Lehmann, A.C.: Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 47(1), 273–305 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Russell, S.: Rationality and intelligence: a brief update. In: Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 7–28. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education Limited (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antero Karvonen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karvonen, A., Kujala, T., Saariluoma, P. (2020). Types of Mimetics for the Design of Intelligent Technologies. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Pickl, S., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design II. IHSED 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1026. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics