Skip to main content

Satisfaction of Aged Users with Mobility Assistive Devices: A Preliminary Study of Conventional Walkers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Systems Engineering and Design II (IHSED 2019)

Abstract

Elderly users’ satisfaction with their walkers was evaluated. A sample of 13 institutionalized aged participants were interviewed and responded to the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) questionnaire, with eight questions that address their level of satisfaction with different aspects of the device. In general, the users reported to be satisfied with their device, with the highest levels of satisfaction with durability and easiness of use. The lowest scores were associated with device weight, ease of adjusting and device stability and safety. The users’ indicated the device safety, easiness of use and comfort as the most relevant aspects of the device. Elderly users’ satisfaction with their mobility devices is likely to correlate with users’ device needs and expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Araujo, L.A.O., Santana, R.F., Bachion, M.A.: Mobilidade física prejudicada em idosos: fatores relacionados e características definidoras. Rev. bras. enferm. 55(1), 19–25 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sandnes, F.E., Medola, F.O., Berg, A., Rodrigues, O.V., Mirtaheri, P., Gjøvaag, T.: Solving the grand challenges together: a Brazil-Norway approach to teaching collaborative design and prototyping of assistive technologies and products for independent living. In: Berg, A., Bohemia, E., Buck, L., Gulden, T., Kovacevic, A., Pavel, N. (eds.) Building Community: Design Education for a Sustainable Future, International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education 7 & 8 September 2017, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Norway. 1 edn. The Design Society; Institution of Engineering Designers, Glasgow, pp. 242–247 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sandnes, F.E., Herstad, J., Stangeland, A.M., Medola, F.O.: UbiWheel: a simple context-aware universal control concept for smart home appliances that encourages active living. In: Proceedings of Smartworld 2017, pp. 446–451. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Medola, F.O., Bertolaccini, G.S., Boiani, J.A.M., Silva, S.R.M.: Mobility aids for the elderly: challenges and opportunities for the Brazilian market. Gerontechnology 15(2), 65–97 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stowe, S., Hopes, J., Mulley, G.: Gerotechnology series: 2. Walking aids. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 1(2), 122–127 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carvalho, K.E.C., Junior, M.B.G., Sá, K.N.: Tradução e validação do Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0) para o idioma português do Brasil. Rev Bras Reumat 54(4), 260–267 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Samuelsson, K., Wressle, E.: User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: an important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil. Rehabil. 30(7), 551–558 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wressle, E., Samuelsson, K.: User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 11(3), 143–150 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, H., Peng, K., Tiedemann, A., Peng, J., Sherrington, C.: Risk factors for falls among older community dwellers in Shenzhen. China Inj. Prev. 25(1), 31–35 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boiani, J.A.M., Barili, S.R.M., Medola, F.O., Sandnes, F.E.: On the non-disabled perceptions of four common mobility devices in Norway: a comparative study based on semantic differentials. Technol. Disabil. 1, 1–11 (2019). (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from CNPq - National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Process N. 427496/2016-0) and Diku – the Norwegian Agency for International Cooperation and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education (UTF-2016-long-term/10053).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fausto Orsi Medola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boiani, J.A.M., Sandnes, F.E., Paschoarelli, L.C., Medola, F.O. (2020). Satisfaction of Aged Users with Mobility Assistive Devices: A Preliminary Study of Conventional Walkers. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Pickl, S., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design II. IHSED 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1026. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_113

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics