Among all the organs of the mammalian body, the gut is the most complex and diverse ecological system, colonized by bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses, which can influence the nutritional status, immune homeostasis and metabolic activity of the host. Despite our existing knowledge showing that the complex relationship between hosts and their microbiome can present a unique opportunity for understanding mammalian adaptation and evolution, the host-microbe relationship in wild nonhuman primates still remains understudied, particularly in the context of social living. In this chapter, we summarize our research work on bacterial/fungal community composition and microbial diversity in Tibetan macaques, and analyze the factors influencing variation of the gut microbiome across age, sex and season in this species. Finally, we use the information to discuss the role of the gut microbiome in the adaptive evolution relating to the feeding ecology of Tibetan macaques.
Microbes dominated the earth for at least 2.5 billion years before multicellular life appeared in the biosphere (Hooper and Gordon 2001; Ley et al. 2008). In fact, animals have been living and evolving in a microbial world (Margaret et al. 2013). Microbes inevitably colonized animals and coevolved through the process of interactions with their hosts (Clayton et al. 2018). Microorganisms can inhabit multiple parts of a host’s body, such as the skin, oral cavity, sex organs, and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. They are usually recognized as the microbiome of a particular host. As an essential part of the host’s body, the microbiome plays an important role in host physiology by influencing nutritional intake, metabolic activity, and immune homeostasis (Turnbaugh et al. 2006; Greenblum et al. 2012; Hooper et al. 2012). Thus, the complex relationship between hosts and their microbiomes provides a unique opportunity for understanding mammalian adaptation and evolution (Hird 2017).
As the most complex and diverse ecological system of the mammalian body, the GI tract is colonized by bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses (Underhill and Iliev 2014). Previous studies have revealed that the gut microbiota play an important role in immune regulation, vitamin synthesis, energy acquisition, and disease risk reduction of the host (Turnbaugh et al. 2006; Hooper et al. 2012; Sharon et al. 2012). For example, all vertebrates lack cellulase, the enzymes, which help them to digest the fiber in their food, and are reliant upon intestinal microbes for its production (Yokoe and Yasumasu 1964; Mackie 2002). As a result, mammals maintain rich gut microbial communities, which are beneficial for the digestion of cellulose and hemicellulose abundant in the foods they ingest (Amato et al. 2015).
Nonhuman primates (NHPs) evolved in tropical forest habitats and radially spread to woodland, savanna and montane environments (Hanya et al. 2011). In order to adapt to the resultant temporal food resource shifts and to maintain ordinary functions of the body, NHPs have evolved many anatomical and behavioral strategies (Rodman and Cant 1984). For example, some primates have evolved specialized stomachs and teeth, while many others have evolved distinctive habitat use patterns, ranging behavior and social organization (Milton and May 1976; Chivers et al. 1984; Cachel 1989; Yamada and Muroyama 2010; Hanya and Chapman 2013). Generally, NHPs prefer to eat high-quality food rich in lipids, proteins, and carbohydrate, such as fruits and young leaves. However, these foods are not always available year-round (Rodman and Cant 1984; Ungar 1995; Hanya et al. 2011; Hanya and Chapman 2013). NHPs living in temperate environments can only eat mature leaves, gum and roots during winter (Fan et al. 2009). These low-quality foods usually contain high proportions of cellulose and hemicellulose, which are difficult to digest (Coley 1983; Burrows 2010). In response to ecological pressures, many primates also use behavioral strategies such as adjusting their activity budgets and foraging patterns to help overcome periods of food scarcity (Zhou et al. 2007; Starr et al. 2012; Hanya and Chapman 2013; Campera et al. 2014). However, how wild primates digest low-quality foods high in cellulose during the winter has not been well understood (Amato et al. 2014).
Although low-quality foods, including woody plants, mature leaves, fungi, mature leaves, and plant exudates are difficult to digest, more recent research related to the above has revealed that these foods can be broken down and utilized by the intestinal microbes of NHPs. For this reason, the gut microbiota may provide a way to understand how primates adapt to ecological pressures during periods of food scarcity. Since the gut microbiome is dominated by bacteria, many studies on the feeding ecology of mammals have focused solely on the bacterial microbiome (Qin et al. 2010). Other common elements, such as gut fungi, also appear to affect the health and nutrition of animals, but this too is not yet well understood (Huffnagle and Noverr 2013; Underhill and Iliev 2014; Sokol et al. 2017). Although intestinal fungi have a much smaller number of cells compared to bacteria, the evidence suggests that gut mycobiota can also play an important role in host health by affecting gut bacterial composition (Hoffmann et al. 2013), interacting with immune cells, and assisting in the metabolic activity of the host (Hajishengallis et al. 2011; Romani 2011; Iliev and Underhill 2012; Rizzetto et al. 2014). Therefore, it is important to integrate information about the role of gut bacteria and fungi when discussing the role of the gut microbiome in the evolution of animal dietary strategies.
NHPs and humans have extensive similarities in their genetic characteristics, physiology and morphology. Very important animal model systems, NHPs are extremely important for understanding human physiology, behavior, cognition, health and evolution (McCord et al. 2014; Ren et al. 2015). Therefore, compared with other laboratory animals, NHPs have an advantage in helping us to understanding the role of the gut microbiome in human health maintenance, as well as the evolutionary relationships involving the gut microbiome, host diet and evolution.
The free-ranging Tibetan macaque (Macaca thibetana) group at Mt. Huangshan (described in Chap. 2) presents a good opportunity for studying this, since all members of the group can be identified individually, allowing for the collection of feces from individuals of known age and sex (Zhang et al. 2010). Our study group lives in a deciduous and evergreen-broadleaf-mixed montane forest. As the temperature fluctuates across seasons (highest in summer: 34.2 °C, lowest in winter: −13. 9 °C), the quality of their food also varies accordingly (see Fig. 11.1). For example, from winter to spring, Tibetan macaques experience a switch from low quality food resources (mature leaves, roots and plant stem) to high quality food resources (young leaves and flowers) (Xiong and Wang 1988; Zhao 1999). As a result, our study population is an ideal model for studying the role of the gut microbiome in primate feeding ecology and evolution.
In this chapter, we will summarize our research on the composition of the bacterial/fungal community and microbial diversity of Tibetan macaques and analysis of the factors influencing variation in the microbiome across age, sex and season in this species. Furthermore, we use this information to discuss the role of the Tibetan macaques’ gut microbiome in relation to the evolution of their feeding ecology.
2 Gut Microbiome of Tibetan Macaque
2.1 Composition of Gut Bacteria
Understanding the composition of an animal’s gut bacteria helps us to reveal its role in the host’s feeding ecology, however, we know little about the Tibetan macaques’ gut microbiota. Recently, using the methods of high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics, Sun et al. (2016) detected 14 known bacterial phyla in this macaque’s gut, the most dominant phyla (relative abundance > 1%) being Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria Spirochaetes (Sun et al. 2016). Comparing our results to those of the gut microbiome in other NHPs (Table 11.1), we found that the two most dominant phyla (Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes) were commonly reported in many other species as well (Ochman et al. 2010; Mckenney et al. 2015; Xu et al. 2015). At the genus level, the two most dominant genera present in the gut of Tibetan macaques were Prevotella and Succinivibrio. Although the genus Prevotella was also commonly reported elsewhere (Ochman et al. 2010; Mckenney et al. 2015; Xu et al. 2015), Succinivibrio has been seldom been detected as a dominant genus. The relative abundance of these main bacterial genera (relative abundance > 1%) are presented in Fig. 11.2a.
2.2 Composition of Gut Fungi
Previous studies on humans and mice have revealed that the mammalian gut is rich in fungi, dominated by three phyla: Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota (Iliev and Underhill 2012; Qiu et al. 2015; Mar et al. 2016; Strati et al. 2016; Wheeler et al. 2016; Sokol et al. 2017). However, little is known about the gut fungi in NHPs. Using the Illlumina Miseq platform and primers of the ITS region (Bokulich and Mills 2013; Sun et al. 2018) first reported that the gut mycobiota of Tibetan macaques was dominated by two phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota (Sun et al. 2018), this is consistent with previous studies on mammalian gut mycobiomes. In addition, other phyla such as Zygomycota, Chytridiomycota, Glomeromycota and Rozellomycota were also detected in this macaque species. At the family level, Trichocomaceae shows the highest relative abundance (24.70%). At the genus level, the gut mycobiota of Tibetan macaques are rich in Aspergillus and Penicillium (relative abundance more than 10% respectively). Furthermore, by defining the core families and genera (both present in >90% of the samples with an average relative abundance > 0.01), Sun et al. (2018) revealed that six core taxa, namely Trichocomaceae, Nectriaceae, Davidiellaceae, Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium can be detected in the gut of Tibetan macaques. The relative abundances of fungal genera (>1%) are presented in Fig. 11.2b. The presence of core taxa in the gut of this macaque suggests that the fungi in their guts are not random and exist as a relatively stable fungal community.
3 Factors Affecting the Gut Microbiome in Tibetan Macaques
3.1 Affects of Age, Sex, and Season on Gut Bacterial Microbiome
It is well known that many internal and external factors can affect the diversity and composition of an animal’s gut microbiota, such as age, sex and seasonal change. Based on data from the Illlumina Miseq platform and linear mixed models, Sun et al. (2016) evaluated factors affecting gut microbial diversity in Tibetan macaques. The results showed that sex and age had no significant effect on the alpha diversity (including Shannon index, Chao 1, OTU richness and ACE) of the gut bacterial microbiome, as well as the beta diversity (evaluating by unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances) (Sun et al. 2016). These results differ from previous studies in humans and other vertebrates (Yatsunenko et al. 2012; Bolnick et al. 2014), but are consistent with those in chimpanzees and baboons (Degnan et al. 2012; Tung et al. 2015).
Seasonal factors on the other hand have a strong effect on the composition and diversity of the gut bacterial microbiome in Tibetan macaques (Sun et al. 2016). For example, the Shannon diversity index of the gut bacterial microbiome was significantly different between winter and spring. In addition, a significant seasonal separation of beta diversity evaluating by weighted UniFrac distances and unweighted UniFrac distances (Permanova tests, p < 0.05 and 0.01 respectably) were detected. Furthermore, three phyla and 20 known genera showed significant differences between the two seasons. The representative taxa rich in winter samples were Proteobacteria, Spirochaetia, Succinivibrio, Clostridium sensu stricto and Treponema, but Firmicutes and Prevotella were richest in spring samples. Differences in the composition of gut bacteria also resulted in the variations of predicted metagenomes between winter and spring. Using PICRUSt and LEfSe tests, Sun et al. (2016) found that seven KEGG pathways of Tibetan macaques’ gut bacterial microbiome, including Glycan Biosynthesis and Metabolism, Amino Acid Metabolism, Signal Transduction, Cell motility, Transport and Catabolism, Neurodegenerative Diseases and Endocrine System, were significantly enriched in the winter. However six other metabolic pathways Energy Metabolism, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Cellular Processes Transcription, Signaling and Metabolism of Cofactors and Vitamins and Enzyme Families were significantly enriched in the spring (Sun et al. 2016). The potential functions of the gut microbiome in different seasons of our study group will be discussed in Sect. 11.4.
3.2 Gut Fungal Microbiome Affected by Age, Sex, and Season
Although previous studies in humans have revealed that age and sex can influence the composition and diversity of the gut fungal microbiome (Strati et al. 2016), little information is available for wild living primates. Using LEfSe analysis, Sun et al. (2018) first reported that only one fungal genus Sarocladium was enriched in the old age group. By comparing males and females, the family Mycosphaerellaceae and genus Devriesia were particularly enriched in females, while the phylum Ascomycota and family Tetraplosphaeriaceae were enriched in males (Sun et al. 2018). These results indicated that the effect of sex and age on the composition of gut fungi was not as strong as that found in humans. In addition, we found evidence of marked seasonal variation in the composition of this macaque species’ gut mycobiota. Fifteen taxa had significant variation across the four seasons. The abundant taxa in each season were as follows, Autumn: Wallemiaceae, Hypocreaceae, Wallemia, Trichoderma; Spring: Sclerotiniaceae, Nectriaceae, Ciboria, Fusarium, Gibberella, Sarocladium and Talaromyces; Summer: Trichocomaceae and Penicillium; Winter: Devriesia and Teratosphaeriaceae. This result is the first report to find strong seasonal influences on primate gut mycobiota, indicating the potential relationship between gut mycobiota and seasonal changes in host diet.
Different from previous studies in humans, no evidence indicates that age or sex strongly affect the alpha diversity of Tibetan macaque gut mycobiota (Sun et al. 2018). This result is likely because even individuals living in the same environment have differences in their dietary preferences. In addition, using PCoA and PERMANOVA tests, we found that there existed significant variation in beta diversity among different age and sex classes. Interestingly, seasonal change can significantly affect alpha and beta diversity, as well as the composition of the gut fungal microbiome.
4 Functions of the Gut Microbiome in Tibetan Macaque Feeding Ecology
Feeding ecology plays an important role in understanding the evolution of NHPs (Lambert 2011). With advances in sequencing technology, many studies have revealed that the gut microbiome aids in the digestion of some food resources, especially those rich in cellulose and hemicellulose, substances which are difficult to digest. Therefore, this important adaptive mechanism has attracted increasing attention in recent years. Tibetan macaques living in a highly seasonal ecosystem with strongly seasonal changes in rainfall, temperature, food resources, and home range shifts (Xiong and Wang 1988; Zhao 1999). Previous studies have suggested that these environmental factors are closely reflected in the composition of the gut microbiome (Amato et al. 2015; Chevalier et al. 2015; Maurice et al. 2015; Wu et al. 2017). Therefore, our study subjects may provide an important model for understanding the functions of the gut microbiome in primate feeding ecology, especially for primates living in highly seasonal ecosystems.
4.1 Gut Bacterial Microbiome and the Feeding Ecology of Tibetan Macaques
It is well known that the gut bacterial microbiome can help hosts to digest food resources more efficiently, and they also can change according to variation in host diet across time and space, helping the host to meet its nutrient and energy requirements (Hooper et al. 2002; Donohoe et al. 2011; Koren et al. 2012; Amato et al. 2014; Chevalier et al. 2015). As a species living in a highly seasonal ecosystem, Tibetan macaques depend mostly on a plant diet for their subsistence, including leaves, grass, roots, fruits, and flowers, and they usually shift home ranges to adapt to seasonal changes in food availability (Xiong and Wang 1988; Zhao 1999). The diverse and responsive gut bacterial community of wild-living Tibetan macaques can be considered an important adaptation for their foraging lifestyle. The presence of the relatively abundant fiber-degrading bacteria of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in their gut can help them to utilize the heavily plant-based diet. Some well-known fiber-degrading bacteria genera detected in the gut of Tibetan macaques, such as Succinivibrio and Clostridium, suggest that the gut bacterial microbiome plays an important role in the Tibetan macaques’ feeding ecology.
In seasonal ecosystems, one of the most important questions is how animals adapt to seasonal changes in food composition and availability. From winter to spring, Tibetan macaques experience a switch from low quality food resources (mature leaves, roots and plant stem) to high quality food resources (young leaves and flowers). Generally, low-quality food resources are rich in cellulose and hemicellulose, and high-quality food resources are rich in pectin, carbohydrates and simple sugars. Based on a comparative study of the Tibetan macaque gut bacterial microbiome between winter and spring (Sun et al. 2016), the gut bacterial adaptive mechanism for seasonal food type’s changes in the Tibetan macaque diet is summarized in Fig. 11.3.
During winter, the representative gut bacterial taxa Proteobacteria, Succinivibrio and Clostridium significantly increased, and the predicted metagenomes of glycan biosynthesis and metabolic pathways significantly increased in winter samples (Sun et al. 2016). The genus Succinivibrio, which usually is detected in rumen microbial ecosystems, ferment glucose efficiently by producing acetic acid and succinic acid (de Menezes et al. 2011), as well as being beneficial to the metabolism of different types of fatty acids (Van Dyke and McCarthy 2002). Another genus Clostridium contains many organisms which produce cellulose and hemicellulose-digestive enzymes (Van Dyke and McCarthy 2002; Zhu et al. 2011). The significant increase of the genus Clostridium in winter samples is very beneficial for the digestion of cellulose and dietary fiber. In addition, evidence from black howler monkeys, humans and mice reveals that Proteobacteria are highly correlated with energy acquisition (Bryant and Small 1956; Koren et al. 2012; Amato et al. 2014; Chevalier et al. 2015). In response to cold weather, primates experience an increase in energy loss (Tsuji et al. 2013), and Tibetan macaques are no exception. The increase of Proteobacteria is beneficial for coping with cold weather. In conclusion, the gut bacterial microbiome in winter increases the efficiency of dietary fiber digestion in Tibetan macaques, which helps them to meet their energy requirements.
In addition, Sun et al. (2016) found that Firmicutes and Prevotella were significantly enriched in the Tibetan macaque gut during spring. During this time, the diet consists mainly of young leaves, flowers and bamboo shoots, foods that are richer in digestible pectin, carbohydrates and simple sugars, compared to mature leaves (Xiong and Wang 1988; Zhao 1999; You et al. 2013). The genus Prevotella is associated with the digestion of carbohydrates simple sugars, pectin and hemicellulose (Amato et al. 2014). The significant increase of genes related to carbohydrate metabolism and energy metabolism pathways in spring samples also indicates that the gut bacterial community helps break down and make accessible these high-quality food resources, beneficial for macaques to recover from energy loss experienced during the cold conditions of winter.
4.2 Gut Fungal Microbiome and Feeding Ecology of Tibetan Macaques
Compared with the gut bacterial microbiome, there is very little data on the primate gut fungal microbiome, and the role of gut fungi in primate foraging ecology is unknown. Sun et al. (2018) first reported the diversity and composition of Tibetan macaque gut mycobiota. Three genera Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium were detected as normal inhabitants in the gut. The two most dominant genera, were Aspergillus (12.46%) and Penicillium (10.72%). It has been reported that the anaerobic species of these two genera can produce cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes, which are beneficial to cellulosic biomass degradation (Boots et al. 2013; Liao et al. 2014; Shuji et al. 2014; Solomon et al. 2016; Trinci et al. 1994). Similarly, as robust cellulose and hemicellulose degrader, the genus Fusarium was reported in a recent study (Huang et al. 2015). At certain times of the year, Tibetan macaques depend on a plant diet, high in cellulose and hemicellulose (Xiong and Wang 1988; You et al. 2013; Campbell et al. 2001). Our previous studies indicated that the dominant genera of Tibetan macaque gut mycrobiota may play an important role in the digestion of these and other plant items.
In addition, the gut fungal microbiome of Tibetan macaques changed with the seasonal change in dietary food content. Fifteen taxa were detected to be significantly enriched in one of the four seasons (Sun et al. 2018). This result indicates that the gut mycrobiota can response to dietary shifts. It has been proposed that the gut mycobiota response to seasonal dietary shift is beneficial to the hosts’ nutritional and reproductive needs (Noma et al. 1998; Tsuji et al. 2013). However, knowledge about the functions of the particular fungi in the mammalian gut is limited (Milton and May 1976), as are genomic databases and metabolic maps of gut fungi (Huffnagle and Noverr 2013), making it difficult to explain the relationship between mycobiota composition and primate feeding ecology. Based on the available information about the genus Penicillium (Shuji et al. 2014), we hypothesize that this summer season enriched genus may aid in the digestion of mature leaves, which contain a higher proportion of cellulose and hemicellulose. However, a possible explanation as to why this genus was not enriched during winter could be that the ingestion of fallen nuts in winter caused the amount of Penicillium to decrease due to some chemical interaction (Maria et al. 2014). Secondly, it has been reported that high diversity of gut mycobiota can improve the utilization efficiency of plant fiber consumption (Bauchop 1981; Akin et al. 1983; Denman and Mcsweeney 2010). Thus, the gut mycobiota with high alpha diversity during the winter, reported in our previous study, may be beneficial for Tibetan macaques to digest dietary fiber. In conclusion, the gut fungal mycobiota detected in Tibetan macaque provides evidence for the role of gut fungi in primate foraging ecology. More attention needs to be paid to this in future studies.
5 Conclusions and Future Directions
Our studies of the Tibetan macaque gut microbiome reviewed in this chapter add important baseline data for the Tibetan macaque to our knowledge of the mammalian gut microbiome regarding difference in host age, sex and its role in feeding ecology, as well as the role of the gut microbiome in the adaptive radiation of primates. Together with anatomical and behavioral strategies, the gut microbiome is believed to be important factor in the successful evolution of NHPs, particularly as an adaption to the temporal fluctuation in food resource types and their availability. The present data on the wild Tibetan macaque gut microbiome leads us to hypothesize that gut microbiota played an important role in the adaptive radiation of primates, and other animals, which can help them to solve foraging dilemmas in seasonally fluctuating environments (Fig. 11.4). Further research is necessary to test this hypothesis on more mammalian species. In addition, mammals living in a microbial environment, and the microorganisms in the soil and plant foods can also change with seasonal fluctuations. The link between the gut microbiome and environmental microbiomes remain to be elucidated.
Akin DE, Gordon GL, Hogan JP (1983) Rumen bacterial and fungal degradation of Digitaria pentzii grown with or without sulfur. Appl Environ Microbiol 46:738–748
Amato KR, Leigh SR, Angela K, Mackie RI, Yeoman CJ, Stumpf RM, Wilson BA, Nelson KE, White BA, Garber PA (2014) The role of gut microbes in satisfying the nutritional demands of adult and juvenile wild, black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra). Am J Phys Anthropol 155:652–664
Amato KR, Leigh SR, Kent A, Mackie RI, Yeoman CJ, Stumpf RM, Wilson BA, Nelson KE, White BA, Garber PA (2015) The gut microbiota appears to compensate for seasonal diet variation in the wild black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra). Microb Ecol 69:434–443
Bauchop T (1981) The anaerobic fungi in rumen fibre digestion. Agric Environ 6:339–348
Bokulich NA, Mills DA (2013) Improved selection of internal transcribed spacer-specific primers enables quantitative, ultra-high-throughput profiling of fungal communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(8):2519–2526
Bolnick DI, Snowberg LK, Hirsch PE, Lauber CL, Parks B, Lusis AJ, Knight R, Caporaso JG, Svanbäck R (2014) Individual diet has sex-dependent effects on vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat Commun 5:4500
Boots B, Lillis L, Clipson N, Petrie K, Kenny DA, Boland TM, Doyle E (2013) Responses of anaerobic rumen fungal diversity (phylum Neocallimastigomycota) to changes in bovine diet. J Appl Microbiol 114:626–635
Bryant MP, Small NJ (1956) Characteristics of two new genera of anaerobic curved rods isolated from the rumen of cattle. J Bacteriol 72:22–26
Burrows AM (2010) The evolution of exudativory in primates. Springer, New York
Cachel S (1989) Primate adaptation and evolution. Int J Primatol 10:487–490
Campbell JL, Glenn KM, Grossi B, Eisemann JH (2001) Use of local North Carolina browse species to supplement the diet of a captive colony of folivorous primates (Propithecus sp.). Zoo Biol 20:447–461
Campera M, Serra V, Balestri M, Barresi M, Ravaolahy M, Randriatafika F, Donati G (2014) Effects of habitat quality and seasonality on ranging patterns of collared brown lemur (Eulemur collaris) in littoral forest fragments. Int J Primatol 35:957–975
Chevalier C, Stojanović O, Colin DJ, Suarez-Zamorano N, Tarallo V, Veyrat-Durebex C, Rigo D, Fabbiano S, Stevanović A, Hagemann S (2015) Gut microbiota orchestrates energy homeostasis during Cold. Cell 163:1360–1374
Chivers DJ, Wood BA, Bilsborough A (1984) Food acquisition and processing in primates: concluding discussion. In: Chivers DJ, Wood BA, Alan B (eds) Food acquisition and processing in primates. Springer, New York, pp 545–556
Clayton JB, Gomez A, Amato K, Knights D, Travis DA, Blekhman R, Knight R, Leigh S, Stumpf R, Wolf T (2018) The gut microbiome of nonhuman primates: lessons in ecology and evolution. Am J Primatol 80:e22867
Coley PD (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecol Monogr 53:209–229
de Menezes AB, Lewis E, O’Donovan M, O’Neill BF, Clipson N, Doyle EM (2011) Microbiome analysis of dairy cows fed pasture or total mixed ration diets. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78:256–265
Degnan PH, Pusey AE, Lonsdorf EV, Goodall J, Wroblewski EE, Wilson ML, Rudicell RS, Hahn BH, Ochman H (2012) Factors associated with the diversification of the gut microbial communities within chimpanzees from Gombe National Park. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:13034–13039
Denman S, Mcsweeney C (2010) Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:572–582
Donohoe DR, Nikhil G, Xinxin Z, Wei S, O’Connell TM, Bunger MK, Bultman SJ (2011) The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon. Cell Metab 13:517–526
Fan P, Ni Q, Sun G, Bei H, Jiang X (2009) Gibbons under seasonal stress: the diet of the black crested gibbon (Nomascus concolor) on Mt. Wuliang, Central Yunnan, China. Primates 50:37–44
Greenblum S, Turnbaugh PJ, Borenstein E (2012) Metagenomic systems biology of the human gut microbiome reveals topological shifts associated with obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. PNAS 109:594–599
Hajishengallis G, Liang S, Payne MA, Hashim A, Jotwani R, Eskan MA, Mcintosh ML, Alsam A, Kirkwood KL, Lambris JD (2011) Low-abundance biofilm species orchestrates inflammatory periodontal disease through the commensal microbiota and complement. Cell Host Microbe 10(5):497–506
Hanya G, Chapman CA (2013) Linking feeding ecology and population abundance: a review of food resource limitation on primates. Ecol Res 28:183–190
Hanya G, Qarro M, Tattou MI, Fuse M, Vallet D, Yamada A, Go M, Takafumi H, Tsujino R, Agetsuma N (2011) Dietary adaptations of temperate primates: comparisons of Japanese and Barbary macaques. Primates 52:187–198
Hird SM (2017) Evolutionary biology needs wild microbiomes. Front Microbiol 8:725
Hoffmann C, Dollive S, Grunberg S, Chen J, Li H, Wu GD, Lewis JD, Bushman FD (2013) Archaea and fungi of the human gut microbiome: correlations with diet and bacterial residents. PLoS One 8:e66019
Hooper LV, Gordon JI (2001) Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut. Science 292(5519):1115–1118
Hooper LV, Midtvedt T, Gordon JI (2002) How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. Annu Rev Nutr 22:283–307
Hooper LV, Littman DR, Macpherson AJ (2012) Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science 336:1268–1273
Huang Y, Busk PK, Lange L (2015) Cellulose and hemicellulose-degrading enzymes in Fusarium commune transcriptome and functional characterization of three identified xylanases. Enzyme Microb Technol 73–74:9–19
Huffnagle GB, Noverr MC (2013) The emerging world of the fungal microbiome. Trends Microbiol 21:334–341
Iliev ID, Underhill DM (2012) Interactions between commensal fungi and the C-type lectin receptor Dectin-1 influence colitis. Science 336:1314–1317
Koren O, Goodrich J, Cullender T, Spor A, Laitinen K, Bäckhed HK, Gonzalez A, Werner J, Angenent L, Knight R (2012) Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell 150:470–480
Lambert JE (2011) Primate nutritional ecology: feeding biology and diet at ecological and evolutionary scales. In: Campbell C, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Panger M, Bearder S, Stumpf R (eds) Primates in perspective, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 512–522
Ley RE, Micah H, Catherine L, Turnbaugh PJ, Rob Roy R, J Stephen B, Schlegel ML, Tucker TA, Schrenzel MD, Rob K (2008) Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 322(5905):1188
Liao H, Li S, Wei Z, Shen Q, Xu Y (2014) Insights into high-efficiency lignocellulolytic enzyme production by Penicillium oxalicum GZ-2 induced by a complex substrate. Biotechnol Biofuels 7(1):162
Mackie RI (2002) Mutualistic fermentative digestion in the gastrointestinal tract: diversity and evolution. Integr Comp Biol 42:319–326
Mar RM, Pérez D, Javier CF, Esteve E, Maringarcia P, Xifra G, Vendrell J, Jové M, Pamplona R, Ricart W (2016) Obesity changes the human gut mycobiome. Sci Rep 6:21679
Margaret MFN, Hadfield MG, Bosch TCG, Carey HV, Tomislav DLO, Douglas AE, Nicole D, Gerard E, Tadashi F, Gilbert SF (2013) Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. PNAS 110:3229–3236
Maria U, Xiaoyu W, Baer DJ, Novotny JA, Marlene F, Volker M (2014) Effects of almond and pistachio consumption on gut microbiota composition in a randomised cross-over human feeding study. Br J Nutr 111:2146–2152
Maurice CF, Cl KS, Ladau J, Pollard KS, Fenton A, Pedersen AB, Turnbaugh PJ (2015) Marked seasonal variation in the wild mouse gut microbiota. ISME J 9:2423–2434
McCord AI, Chapman CA, Weny G, Tumukunde A, Hyeroba D, Klotz K, Koblings AS, Mbora DN, Cregger M, White BA (2014) Fecal microbiomes of non-human primates in Western Uganda reveal species-specific communities largely resistant to habitat perturbation. Am J Primatol 76:347–354
Mckenney EA, Melissa A, Lambert JE, Vivek F (2015) Fecal microbial diversity and putative function in captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), Hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) and binturongs (Arctictis binturong). Integr Zool 9:557–569
Milton K, May ML (1976) Body weight, diet and home range area in primates. Nature 259:459–462
Noma N, Suzuki S, Izawa K (1998) Inter-annual variation of reproductive parameters and fruit availability in two populations of Japanese macaques. Primates 39:313–324
Ochman H, Worobey M, Kuo CH, Ndjango JBN, Peeters M, Hahn BH, Hugenholtz P (2010) Evolutionary relationships of wild hominids recapitulated by gut microbial communities. PLoS Biol 8:8
Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T (2010) A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464(7285):59–65
Qiu X, Zhang F, Yang X, Wu N, Jiang W, Li X, Li X, Liu Y (2015) Changes in the composition of intestinal fungi and their role in mice with dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Sci Rep 5:10416
Ren T, Grieneisen LE, Alberts SC, Archie EA, Wu M (2015) Development, diet and dynamism: longitudinal and cross-sectional predictors of gut microbial communities in wild baboons. Environ Microbiol 18(5):1312–1325
Rizzetto L, De FC, Cavalieri D (2014) Richness and diversity of mammalian fungal communities shape innate and adaptive immunity in health and disease. Eur J Immunol 44:3166–3181
Rodman PS, Cant JGH (1984) Anatomy and behavior. (Book reviews: adaptations for foraging in nonhuman primates). Science 226:1187–1188
Romani L (2011) Immunity to fungal infections. Nat Rev Immunol 11:275–288
Sharon G, Turnbaugh PJ, Elhanan B (2012) Metagenomic systems biology of the human gut microbiome reveals topological shifts associated with obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. PNAS 109:594–599
Shuji T, Takashi K, Tetsuo K (2014) Complex regulation of hydrolytic enzyme genes for cellulosic biomass degradation in filamentous fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:4829–4837
Sokol H, Leducq V, Aschard H, Pham HP, Jegou S, Landman C, Cohen D, Liguori G, Bourrier A, Nionlarmurier I (2017) Fungal microbiota dysbiosis in IBD. Gut 66:1039–1048
Solomon KV, Haitjema CH, Henske JK, Gilmore SP, Borges-Rivera D, Lipzen A, Brewer HM, Purvine SO, Wright AT, Theodorou MK (2016) Early-branching gut fungi possess a large, comprehensive array of biomass-degrading enzymes. Science 351:1192–1195
Starr C, Nekaris KAI, Leung L (2012) Hiding from the moonlight: luminosity and temperature affect activity of Asian nocturnal primates in a highly seasonal forest. PLoS One 7:e36396.1–e36396.8
Strati F, Paola MD, Stefanini I, Albanese D, Rizzetto L, Lionetti P, Calabrò A, Jousson O, Donati C, Cavalieri D (2016) Age and gender affect the composition of fungal population of the human gastrointestinal tract. Front Microbiol 7:1227
Sun B, Xi W, Bernstein S, Huffman MA, Xia DP, Gu Z, Rui C, Sheeran LK, Wagner RS, Li J (2016) Marked variation between winter and spring gut microbiota in free-ranging Tibetan Macaques (Macaca thibetana). Sci Rep 6:26035
Sun B, Gu Z, Wang X, Huffman MA, Garber PA, Sheeran LK, Zhang D, Zhu Y, Xia DP, Li JH (2018) Season, age, and sex affect the fecal mycobiota of free-ranging Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana). Am J Primatol 80(7):e22880
Trinci APJ, Davies DR, Gull K, Lawrence MI, Nielsen BB, Rickers A, Theodorou MK (1994) Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals. Mycol Res 98:129–152
Tsuji Y, Hanya G, Grueter CC (2013) Feeding strategies of primates in temperate and alpine forests: comparison of Asian macaques and colobines. Primates 54:201–215
Tung J, Barreiro LB, Burns MB, Grenier JC, Lynch J, Grieneisen LE, Altmann J, Alberts SC, Blekhman R, Archie EA (2015) Social networks predict gut microbiome composition in wild baboons. elife 4:e05224
Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI (2006) An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444:1027–1031
Underhill DM, Iliev ID (2014) The mycobiota: interactions between commensal fungi and the host immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 14:405–416
Ungar PS (1995) Fruit preferences of four sympatric primate species at Ketambe, Northern Sumatra, Indonesia. Int J Primatol 16:221–245
Van Dyke M, McCarthy A (2002) Molecular biological detection and characterization of Clostridium populations in municipal landfill sites. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2049–2053
Wheeler ML, Limon JJ, Bar AS, Leal CA, Gargus M, Tang J, Brown J, Funari VA, Wang HL, Crother TR (2016) Immunological consequences of intestinal fungal dysbiosis. Cell Host Microbe 19(6):865–873
Wu Q, Wang X, Ding Y, Hu Y, Nie Y, Wei W, Ma S, Yan L, Zhu L, Wei F (2017) Seasonal variation in nutrient utilization shapes gut microbiome structure and function in wild giant pandas. Proc Biol Sci 284:20170955
Xiong C, Wang Q (1988) Seasonal habitat used by Thibetan Monkeys. Acta Theriol Sinica 8:176–183
Xu B, Xu W, Yang F, Li J, Yang Y, Tang X, Mu Y, Zhou J, Huang Z (2013) Metagenomic analysis of the pygmy loris fecal microbiome reveals unique functional capacity related to metabolism of aromatic compounds. PLoS One 8(2):e56565
Xu B, Xu W, Li J, Dai L, Xiong C, Tang X, Yang Y, Mu Y, Zhou J, Ding J (2015) Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation. BMC Genomics 16:174
Yamada A, Muroyama Y (2010) Effects of vegetation type on habitat use by crop-raiding Japanese macaques during a food-scarce season. Primates 51:159
Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486(7402):222–227
Yokoe Y, Yasumasu I (1964) The distribution of cellulase in invertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol 13:323–338
You SY, Yin HB, Zhang SZ, Tian-Ying JI, Feng XM (2013) Food habits of Macaca thibetana at Mt. Huangshan,China. J Biol 30(5):64–67
Zhang M, Li J, Zhu Y, Wang X, Wang S (2010) Male mate choice in Tibetan macaques Macaca thibetana at Mt. Huangshan, China. Curr Zool 56:213–221
Zhao Q-K (1999) Responses to seasonal changes in nutrient quality and patchiness of food in a multigroup community of Tibetan macaques at Mt. Emei. Int J Primatol 20:511–524
Zhou Q, Wei F, Huang C, Li M, Ren B, Luo B (2007) Seasonal variation in the activity patterns and time budgets of Trachypithecus francoisi in the Nonggang Nature Reserve, China. Int J Primatol 28:657–671
Zhu L, Wu Q, Dai J, Zhang S, Wei F (2011) Evidence of cellulose metabolism by the giant panda gut microbiome. PNAS 108:17714–17719
Many thanks to the Huangshan Garden Forest Bureau for their permission and support of this work. We also gratefully acknowledge Paul A. Garber, Lori K. Sheeran and all members of our research group for their excellent work on the gut microbiome of Tibetan macaques. This chapter was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31870371, 31400330, 31172106), the Special Foundation for Excellent Young Talents in University of Anhui Province, China (No. 2012SQRL018ZD) and the Initial Funding for Doctoral Research in Anhui University (No. J01003229).
Editors and Affiliations
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sun, B., Huffman, M.A., Li, JH. (2020). The Gut Microbiome of Tibetan Macaques: Composition, Influencing Factors and Function in Feeding Ecology. In: Li, JH., Sun, L., Kappeler, P. (eds) The Behavioral Ecology of the Tibetan Macaque. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27920-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27919-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27920-2