Skip to main content

Racial Futurity: Biolegality and the Question of Black Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Personhood in the Age of Biolegality

Part of the book series: Biolegalities ((BIOGA))

  • 576 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers how IVF donor insemination technologies can open the possibilities for the denial of black life. It asks: how might the birth of black child to a white mother—by way of donor insemination—be conceived as a “wrongful birth,” as it was in the 2014 Illinois Northern District Court case of Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank? How is it that someone’s race—in this case the blackness of a newborn—can be viewed and used as a measure of injury (against a white parent) for which compensation or legal reparation was demanded? And, lastly, what does this case reflect about the perceived value—or lack thereof—of black life in America and the possibilities of and for racial futurity, understood as the guarantee of life’s continuation? Cramblett squarely placed the question of the valuation of black life before the law, which was used here to adjudicate the personal rights of the mother against her child. In this assessment of biolegality, fundamental questions of the intersections of law, biology, and society are brought into stark relief, highlighting the challenges presented through bioscientific-technological interventions into “life itself.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Armstrong A & Plowden, TC 2012, ‘Ethnicity and assisted reproductive technologies’, Clinical Practice (London), vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 651–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C 2012, Race decoded: the genomic fight for social justice, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J 2015, ‘Hope against hope: queer negativity, black feminist theorizing, and reproduction without futurity’, Mosaic: A Journal for the Interdisciplinary Study of Literature, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, LXZ 2018, ‘Legal ableism, interrupted: developing tort law and policy alternatives to wrongful birth and wrongful life claims’, Disability Studies Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, LLC, ‘Complaint for Wrongful Birth and Breach of Warranty’, 29 September 2014. Circuit Court of Cooks County, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, LLC. No. 15 L 000282, ‘Midwest Sperm Bank LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint at Law’, 2015. Circuit Court of Cooks County, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas, M 2014, ‘Ohio woman sues sperm bank after racial mix-up’, CNN, 2 October, viewed 15 November 2018, https://edition.cnn.com/2014/10/02/us/sperm-bank-race-lawsuit/index.html.

  • Daniels, CR & Heidt-Forsythe, E 2012, ‘Gendered eugenics and the problematic of free market reproductive technologies: sperm and egg donation in the United States’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 719–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M & Neal, AW 2008, Foucault on politics, security and war, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duster, T 2005, ‘Medicine, race and reification in science’, Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), vol. 307, pp. 1050–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, N 2011, ‘Onerous passions: colonial anti-miscegenation rhetoric and the history of sexuality’, Patterns of Prejudice, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, NR 2005, ‘ART for the masses? Racial and ethnic inequality in assisted reproductive technologies’, DePaul Journal of Health Care Law, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 719–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M 2003, Society must be defended: lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976, Picador, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D 2009, ‘Racial classification in assisted reproduction’, The Yale Law Journal, vol. 188, pp. 1844–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, HL 1987, Figures in black: words, signs, and the ‘racial’ self, Oxford University Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, FD & Rapp, R 1995, Conceiving the new world order: the global politics of reproduction, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, DT 1992, ‘The semantics of race’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 15, pp. 543–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C 1993, ‘Whiteness as property’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 1707–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, S 1997, Scenes of subjection: terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, S 2007, Lose your mother: a journey along the Atlantic slave route, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, S 2014, ‘The value of whiteness: a lawsuit is being waged against the “wrongful birth” of a black child’, The Nation, 12 November, viewed 11 August 2018, https://www.thenation.com/article/value-whiteness/.

  • Heidt-Forsythe, E 2017, ‘Morals or markets? Regulating assisted reproductive technologies as morality or economic policies in the states’, AJOB Empirical Bioethics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, SP 2012, The erotic life of racism, Duke University Press, Durham and London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, LA, Change, O, Humm, K, Sakkas, D & Hacker, M 2016, ‘Influence of race and ethnicity on in vitro fertilization outcomes: systematic review’, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 212–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearl, MK 2018, ‘The stolen property of whiteness: a case study in critical intersectional rhetorics of race and disability’, Rhetoric Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 300–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, LP & Kaebnick, GE 2007, Reprogenetics: law, policy, and ethical issues, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhardt, RA 2017, ‘The color of kinship’, Lowa Law Review, vol. 102, pp. 2071–2107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenon, S & Peers, D 2017, ‘‘Wrongful’ inheritance: race, disability and sexuality’, Cramblett v. Midwest Sperm Bank, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 25, pp. 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, IH 1996, White by law: the legal construction of race, New York University Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Driscoll, AK & Drake, P 2018, ‘Births: final data for 2017’, National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 67, no. 8. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, viewed 15 November 2018, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_08-508.pdf.

  • Mamo, L 2005, ‘Biomedicalizing kinship: sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties’, Science as Culture, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, DB, Schufreider, A, Lee, SM, Feinberg, EC & Uhler, ML 2015, ‘Racial disparities in in vitro fertilization outcomes’, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 398–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M 2017, The economization of life, Duke University Press Books, Durham, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A 2016, The social life of DNA: race, reparations, and reconciliation after the genome, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M & Winant, H 1986, Racial formation in the United States: from the 1960s to the 1980s, Routledge, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiroga, SS 2007, ‘Blood is thicker than water: policing donor insemination and the reproduction of whiteness’, Hypatia, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regalado, A 2015, ‘Engineering the perfect baby’, MIT Technology Review, May/June, viewed 11 November 2018, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/535661/engineering-the-perfect-baby/.

  • Roberts, D 2009, ‘Race, gender, and genetic technologies: a new reproductive dystopia?’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 783–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C 2015, ‘The race idea in reproductive technologies: beyond epistemic scientism and technological mastery’, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, vol. 12, pp. 601–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shange, S 2014, ‘Black on purpose: race, inheritance and queer reproduction’, The Feminist Wire, 10 October, viewed 1 November 2018, http://thefeministwire.com/2014/10/black-purpose-race-inheritance-queer-reproduction/.

  • Spillers, H 1987, ‘Mama’s baby, Papa’s maybe: an American grammar book’, Diacritics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Clifford 2015, ‘Suit filed over mix-up at Downers Grove sperm bank is dismissed’, Chicago Tribune, 3 September, viewed 15 November 2018, https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/downers-grove/news/ct-dupage-sperm-bank-suit-met-0904-20150903-story.html.

  • Zack, N (ed.) 2000, Race/sex: their sameness, difference and interplay, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberi, T 2001, Thicker than blood: how racial statistics lie, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Ehlers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ehlers, N. (2020). Racial Futurity: Biolegality and the Question of Black Life. In: de Leeuw, M., van Wichelen, S. (eds) Personhood in the Age of Biolegality. Biolegalities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27848-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27848-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27847-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27848-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics