Advertisement

Reflections on Game-Based Learning

  • Matthew BarrEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

The previous chapter presented interviews with participants in a study designed to explore whether playing selected video games might help develop in students a range of useful skills and competencies, also known as graduate attributes. In this chapter, the implications of the interview data are considered. Each attribute is examined in turn and the chapter concludes with a brief overview of the skills and experience that students suggest they developed in addition to the stated graduate attributes. Ancillary benefits such as stress relief are also discussed. These empirical observations support ideas presented by scholars such as James Paul Gee and suggest further connections between game-based learning and established theory. It is important to note, however, that these interview data refer to the circumstances under which specific games were played: the participants make multiple references to the effects of being asked to play games with people other than their existing friends. Several of the attributes discussed here appear to be influenced by the fact that students played with strangers from differing cultural backgrounds and with varying gaming experience. Regardless, these interviews reveal the factors that may be at play in a game-based intervention intended to develop graduate attributes.

References

  1. 3909 LLC. (2013). Papers, Please. 3909 LLC.Google Scholar
  2. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013). Gender Differences in Research Collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 811–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem Solving and Learning. American Psychologist, 48(1), 35–44.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assunção, C. (2016). No Girls on the Internet’: The Experience of Female Gamers in the Masculine Space of Violent Gaming. Press Start, 3(1), 46–65.Google Scholar
  5. Bacon, F. (1625/1928). Of Studies (pp. xii–3). Samuel T. Farquhar.Google Scholar
  6. Barab, S. A., Scott, B., Siyahhan, S., Goldstone, R., Ingram-Goble, A., Zuiker, S. J., & Warren, S. (2009). Transformational Play as a Curricular Scaffold: Using Videogames to Support Science Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bethesda Game Studios. (2011). The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim. Bethesda Softworks.Google Scholar
  8. BioWare. (2014). Dragon Age: Inquisition. Electronic Arts.Google Scholar
  9. Blizzard Entertainment. (1994–). Warcraft Series. Blizzard Entertainment.Google Scholar
  10. Blizzard Entertainment. (1998). Starcraft. Blizzard Entertainment.Google Scholar
  11. Blizzard Entertainment. (2002). Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos. Blizzard Entertainment.Google Scholar
  12. Blohm, J. M., & Piltz, D. (Eds.). (2012). NASAGA Training Activity Book. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Bonus, J. A., Peebles, A., & Riddle, K. (2015). The Influence of Violent Video Game Enjoyment on Hostile Attributions. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 472–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourgonjon, J., Vandermeersche, G., Wever, B. D., Soetaert, R., & Valcke, M. (2015). Players’ Perspectives on the Positive Impact of Video Games: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Online Forum Discussions. New Media & Society, 1461444815569723.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815569723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, J. S. (2006). New Learning Environments for the 21st Century. Retrieved from http://www.johnseelybrown.com/newlearning.pdf.
  16. Brown, J. S. (2012, August 7). How World of Warcraft Could Save Your Business and The Economy. Big Think. Retrieved August 1, 2018, https://bigthink.com/videos/how-world-of-warcraft-could-save-your-business-and-the-economy-2.
  17. Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (1993). Is There Any Reason to Research Sex Differences in Communication? Communication Quarterly, 41(2), 129–144.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coates, J. (2015). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Connolly, T. M., Stansfield, M., Ramsay, J., & Sutherland, J. (2004). Applying Computer Games Concepts to Teaching Database Analysis and Design. Presented at the International Conference on Computer Games, AI, Design and Education, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C.-J., & Cragnolini, V. (2004). Developing Generic Skills at University, During Work Placement and in Employment: Graduates’ Perceptions. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(2), 147–165.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000206636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crystal Dynamics. (2010). Lara Croft and the Guardian of Light. Square Enix.Google Scholar
  22. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  23. Educational Simulations. (2001). Real Lives. Educational Simulations.Google Scholar
  24. Eliot, G. (1881). The works of George Eliot. Standard Edition: Essays. Edinburgh: Blackwood.Google Scholar
  25. Ennis, R. H. (2015). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. In M. Davies & R. Barnett (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 31–47). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37805-7_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the Life Cycle: Selected Papers. Oxford, UK: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gearbox Software. (2012). Borderlands 2. 2K Games.Google Scholar
  28. Gee, J. P. (2007). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Grice, H. P. (1969). Utterer’s Meaning and Intention. The Philosophical Review, 78(2), 147–177.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2184179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching Problem Solving Through Cooperative Grouping. Part 1: Group Versus Individual Problem Solving. American Journal of Physics, 60(7), 627–636.  https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Infinite Fall. (2017). Night in the Woods. Finji.Google Scholar
  32. Jayanth, M. (2014, September 18). 52% of Gamers Are Women – But the Industry Doesn’t Know It. The Guardian. Retrieved September 30, 2016 from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/18/52-percent-people-playing-games-women-industry-doesnt-know.
  33. Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., & Evans, C. (2009). The Civic Potential of Video Games. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kuhn, P., & Villeval, M. C. (2014). Are Women More Attracted to Co-operation Than Men? The Economic Journal, 125(582), 115–140.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lord, R. G., & Smith, W. G. (1999). Leadership and the Changing Nature of Performance. In E. D. Pulakos & D. R. Ilgen (Eds.), The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  36. Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A Cultural Approach to Male–Female Miscommunication. In J. J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and Social Identity (pp. 196–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to Learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Matsouka, K., & Mihail, D. M. (2016). Graduates’ Employability: What Do Graduates and Employers Think? Industry and Higher Education, 30(5), 321–326.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422216663719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mojang. (2011). Minecraft. Mojang.Google Scholar
  40. Moore, A., & Ash, A. (2002). Reflective Practice in Beginning Teachers: Helps, Hindrances and the Role of the Critical Other. Presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, England.Google Scholar
  41. Naughty Dog. (2013). The Last of Us. Sony Interactive Entertainment.Google Scholar
  42. Nicol, D. J. (2010). The Foundation for Graduate Attributes: Developing Self-Regulation Through Self and Peer-Assessment. Glasgow: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  43. Norris, S. P., & Ennis, R. H. (1989). Evaluating Critical Thinking. Midwest Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Nuangjumnong, T. (2016). The Influences of Online Gaming on Leadership Development. In M. L. Gavrilova, C. J. K. Tan, A. Iglesias, M. Shinya, A. Galvez, & A. Sourin (Eds.), Transactions on Computational Science XXVI: Special Issue on Cyberworlds and Cybersecurity (pp. 142–160). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49247-5_9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ployhart, Robert E., & Bliese, Paul D. (2006). Individual Adaptability (I-ADAPT) Theory: Conceptualizing the Antecedents, Consequences, and Measurement of Individual Differences in Adaptability. In Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance within Complex Environments (Vols. 1-0, Vol. 6, pp. 3–39). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  46. Positech Games. (2005). Democracy. Positech Games.Google Scholar
  47. Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the Workplace: Development of a Taxonomy of Adaptive Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reeder, H. M. (1996). A Critical Look at Gender Difference in Communication Research. Communication Studies, 47(4), 318–330.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rusnak, P., Dobson, T., & Boskic, N. (2008). Articulation of Ecological Values in Alternate Reality Gaming: A Case Study of World Without Oil. Presented at the 2nd European Conference on Games Based Learning, Univesitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain.Google Scholar
  50. Schwabe, G., Goth, C., & Frohberg, D. (2005). Does Team Size Matter in Mobile Learning? In International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB’05) (pp. 227–234). Presented at the International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB’05).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMB.2005.35.
  51. Shaw, A., & Friesem, E. (2016). Where Is the Queerness in Games?: Types of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Content in Digital Games. International Journal of Communication, 10(0), 13.Google Scholar
  52. Simpson, C. M. (2015, July 31). In Another Time with (an)other Race: Representations of Race and National Narratives in Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim And Fallout 3. Arlington: University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, E. M., Ford, J. K., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (1997). Building Adaptive Expertise: Implications for Training Design Strategies. In M. A. Quiñones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace: Applications of Psychological Research (pp. 89–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stajkovic, A. D. (2006). Development of a Core Confidence-Higher Order Construct. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1208–1224.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stojanović-Prelević, I. (2011). On Communicative Intention and Saying/Implicating Distinction. Facta Universitatis, 9(2), 107–114.Google Scholar
  56. Tempone, I. (2012). Desirable Generic Attributes for Accounting Graduates into the Twenty-First Century: The Views of Employers. Accounting Research Journal, 25(1), 41–55.  https://doi.org/10.1108/10309611211244519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. The Fullbright Company. (2013). Gone Home. The Fullbright Company.Google Scholar
  58. Thiagarajan, S., & Parker, G. (2008). Teamwork and Teamplay: Games and Activities for Building and Training Teams (1st ed.). Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  59. Toby Fox. (2015). Undertale. Toby Fox.Google Scholar
  60. Toups, Z. O., Kerne, A., & Hamilton, W. A. (2011). The Team Coordination Game: Zero-fidelity Simulation Abstracted from Fire Emergency Response Practice. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(4), 23:1–23:37.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2063231.2063237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Valve Corporation. (2000). Counter-Strike. Valve Corporation.Google Scholar
  62. Valve Corporation. (2007). Team Fortress 2. Valve Corporation.Google Scholar
  63. Valve Corporation. (2011). Portal 2. Valve Corporation.Google Scholar
  64. Van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology of Language Learning: Practice to Theory, Theory to Practice. Presented at the UC Language Consortium Conference on Theoretical and Pedagogical Perspectives, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  65. White, S. S., Mueller-Hanson, R. A., Dorsey, D. W., Pulakos, E. D., Wisecarver, M. M., Deagle, E. A., & Mendini, K. G. (2005). Developing Adaptive Proficiency in Special Forces Officers. Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Williams, B. (2001). Developing Critical Reflection for Professional Practice Through Problem-Based Learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(1), 27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.3411737.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xanthopoulou, D., & Papagiannidis, S. (2012). Play Online, Work Better? Examining the Spillover of Active Learning and Transformational Leadership. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(7), 1328–1339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zauszniewski, J. A., Lai, C.-Y., & Tithiphontumrong, S. (2006). Development and Testing of the Resourcefulness Scale for Older Adults. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 14(1), 57–68.  https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.14.1.57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Computing Science EducationUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations