Advertisement

Playing Games at University

  • Matthew BarrEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

It has been argued that video games might be used to develop in students the desirable skills and competencies sometimes referred to as graduate attributes. However, in order to assess this claim, empirical research that examines the relationship between playing video games at university and the attainment of such attributes is required. In this chapter, a randomised controlled study is described, wherein undergraduate students were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group played specified video games under controlled conditions over a period of one semester, while control group participants did not. Control and intervention group attribute attainment was tested at the beginning and the end of the study, allowing comparisons to be made between the development of communication skill, resourcefulness, and adaptability in both groups. For each of these graduate attribute measures, the data indicated a significant increase in mean scores for participants in the intervention group over those in the control group, suggesting that playing selected video games under specific circumstances can improve graduate skills.

References

  1. 3909 LLC. (2013). Papers, Please. 3909 LLC.Google Scholar
  2. All of Denmark Virtually Recreated. (2014, April 25). Retrieved June 17, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27155859.
  3. Barendregt, W. (2011). The Influence of the Level of Free-Choice Learning Activities on the Use of an Educational Computer Game. Computers & Education, 56(1), 80–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr, M. (2016). Using Video Games to Develop Graduate Attributes: A Pilot Study. In The University of the West of Scotland (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 41–49). Paisley, Scotland, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  5. Blizzard Entertainment. (2002). Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos. Blizzard Entertainment.Google Scholar
  6. Blizzard Entertainment. (2004). World of Warcraft. Blizzard Entertainment.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York; London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crystal Dynamics. (2010). Lara Croft and the Guardian of Light. Square Enix.Google Scholar
  9. Devlin, A. M., Lally, V., Canavan, B., & Magill, J. (2013). The Role of the “Inter-Life” Virtual World as a Creative Technology to Support Student Transition into Higher Education. Creative Education, 04(7), 191.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.47A2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dring, C. (2010, July 20). EA’s Moore: Metacritic Mania a ‘Slippery Slope’? Develop Online. Retrieved 24 March 2016, from http://www.develop-online.net/news/ea-s-moore-metacritic-mania-a-slippery-slope/0107404.
  11. Duran, R. L. (1983). Communicative Adaptability: A Measure of Social Communicative Competence. Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 320–326.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378309369521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duran, R. L. (1992). Communicative Adaptability: A Review of Conceptualization and Measurement. Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 253–268.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., Smith, J. H., & Tosca, S. P. (2008). Understanding Video Games: The Essential Introduction (New ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Gearbox Software. (2012). Borderlands 2. 2K Games.Google Scholar
  15. Graft, K. (2011, March 9). Take-Two’s Zelnick Stresses Importance of Metacritic Scores. Accessed March 24, 2016, from http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/33092/TakeTwos_Zelnick_Stresses_Importance_Of_Metacritic_Scores.php.
  16. Hess, T., & Gunter, G. (2013). Serious Game-Based and Nongame-Based Online Courses: Learning Experiences and Outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 372–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hollis, S., & Campbell, F. (1999). What Is Meant by Intention to Treat Analysis? Survey of Published Randomised Controlled Trials. British Medical Journal, 319(7211), 670–674.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7211.670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. id Software. (1996). Quake. GT Interactive.Google Scholar
  19. Laybourn, P., Falchikov, N., Goldfinch, J., & Westwood, J. (2013). Evolution of Skills Development Initiatives. In S. Fallows & C. Steven (Eds.), Integrating Key Skills in Higher Education: Employability, Transferable Skills and Learning for Life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Mojang. (2011). Minecraft. Mojang.Google Scholar
  21. Ployhart, Robert E., & Paul D. Bliese. (2006). Individual Adaptability (I-ADAPT) Theory: Conceptualizing the Antecedents, Consequences, and Measurement of Individual Differences in Adaptability. In Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance Within Complex Environments (Vols. 1–0, Vol. 6, pp. 3–39). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  22. Remedios, R., Ritchie, K., & Lieberman, D. A. (2005). I Used to Like It But Now I Don’t: The Effect of the Transfer Test in Northern Ireland on Pupils’ Intrinsic Motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 435–452.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X24771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In M. Johnston, S. C. Wright, & J. Weinman (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
  25. The Fullbright Company. (2013). Gone Home. The Fullbright Company.Google Scholar
  26. Valve Corporation. (2007). Team Fortress 2. Valve Corporation.Google Scholar
  27. Valve Corporation. (2011). Portal 2. Valve Corporation.Google Scholar
  28. Valve Corporation. (2013). Dota 2. Valve Corporation.Google Scholar
  29. Zauszniewski, J. A., Lai, C.-Y., & Tithiphontumrong, S. (2006). Development and Testing of the Resourcefulness Scale for Older Adults. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 14(1), 57–68.  https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.14.1.57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Computing Science EducationUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations