Skip to main content

Robot Workspace Optimization and Deformation Compensation in Grinding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11745))

Abstract

Industrial robots are becoming a key component of modern manufacturing due to their flexibility and low-cost. However, the motion singularity and weak stiffness caused by the open series structure of the robot have a strong influence on its positioning accuracy and machining quality. In this paper, considering the dexterity and stiffness illustrated above, the method of workspace optimization and grinding deformation error compensation are utilized to improve the precision of the robot grinding. First of all, the robot dexterity analysis is carried out to obtain its dexterous workspace. And then, the workspace stiffness distribution is analyzed with the compliance ellipsoid model, which results in the acquisition of stiffer workspace. Finally, the characterization method of grinding normal deformation is proposed by setting the material removal rate as an index, and the way to compensate this deformation is brought out accordingly. A robot grinding experimental platform in this paper is set up based on KUKA KR210-2 to validate the method aforementioned. The accuracy is improved from 0.148 mm to 0.189 mm, which verifies the effectiveness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yoshikawa, T.: Manipulability and redundancy control of robotic mechanisms. In: International Conference on Robotics & Automation. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angeles, J., Rojas, A.: Manipulator inverse kinematics via condition-number minimization and continuation. Int. J. Robot. Autom. 2(2), 61–69 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zargarbashi, S.H.H., Khan, W., Angeles, J.: The Jacobian condition number as a dexterity index in 6R machining robots. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 28(6), 694–699 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo, Y., Dong, H., Ke, Y.: Stiffness-oriented posture optimization in robotic machining applications. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 35, 69–76 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bu, Y., Liao, W., Tian, W., et al.: Stiffness analysis and optimization in robotic drilling application. Precis. Eng. 49, 388–400 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, C., Peng, F., Yan, R., et al.: Stiffness performance index based posture and feed orientation optimization in robotic milling process. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 55, 29–40 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Slavkovic, N.R., Milutinovic, D.S., Glavonjic, M.M.: A method for off-line compensation of cutting force-induced errors in robotic machining by tool path modification. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 70(9–12), 2083–2096 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, J., Zhang, H., Fuhlbrigge, T.: Improving machining accuracy with robot deformation compensation. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems. IEEE Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hartenberg, R., Denavit, J.: Kinematic Synthesis of Linkages. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1964)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, Y., Zhao, H., Ding, H.: Posture optimization methodology of 6R industrial robots for machining using performance evaluation indexes. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 48, 59–72 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alici, G., Shirinzadeh, B.: Enhanced stiffness modeling, identification and characterization for robot manipulators. IEEE Trans. Robot. 21(4), 554–564 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salisbury, J.K.: Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates. In: IEEE Conference on Decision & Control (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zargarbashi, S.H.H., Khan, W., Angeles, J.: Posture optimization in robot-assisted machining operations. Mech. Mach. Theory 51, 74–86 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren, J., Hua, D.: Grinding Principle. Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by China Scholarship Council (No. 201706295033) and the National Science and Technology Major Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2017ZX04011011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, X., Chen, B., Qi, J., Niu, Z. (2019). Robot Workspace Optimization and Deformation Compensation in Grinding. In: Yu, H., Liu, J., Liu, L., Ju, Z., Liu, Y., Zhou, D. (eds) Intelligent Robotics and Applications. ICIRA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11745. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27529-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27529-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27528-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27529-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics