Advertisement

Adaptive Impedance Control for Robotic Polishing with an Intelligent Digital Compliant Grinder

  • Qianlong Xie
  • Huan ZhaoEmail author
  • Tao Wang
  • Han Ding
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11745)

Abstract

Aircraft-engine blade has a free-form surface in space, which is extremely complicated. And the surface milling must be polished completely to eliminate the surface residual texture and stress concentration. To solve this problem, an intelligent digital compliant grinder with active and passive compliance, double-end floating and multi-station polishing is independent-designed. Besides, a novel impedance controller based on particle swarm optimization algorithm is proposed, which can realize adaptive adjustment of the impedance parameters. And it can maintain the contact force between the grinding tool and the workpiece to a constant value. The experimental results show that the proposed method works well and the surface roughness and the machining consistency of the blade are greatly improved with the intelligent digital compliant grinder for active contact force. Specifically, the surface roughness of the blade reduces from 0.730 μm to 0.065 μm, and the force fluctuation is less than 1 N, therefore, leading to a better surface quality.

Keywords

Complex blade Robotic polishing Intelligent digital compliant grinder Particle swarm optimization Adaptive impedance control 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2017YFB1303401, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 91748114 and 51535004.

References

  1. 1.
    Tian, F., Lv, C., Li, Z., et al.: Modeling and control of robotic automatic polishing for curved surfaces. CIRP J. Manufact. Sci. Technol. 14, 55–64 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao, H., Zhao, Z., Sun, Y.W.: Recent development of the aero-engine impeller and blade surface polishing technology. Adv. Mater. Res. 135, 7–12 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liao, L., Xi, F., Liu, K.: Adaptive control of pressure tracking for polishing process. ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 132(1), 011015 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhong, Z.W.: Recent advances in polishing of advanced materials. Adv. Manuf. Process. 23(5), 8 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duan, J., Shi, Y., Li, X., et al.: Adaptive polishing for blisk by flexible grinding head. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 32(5), 934–940 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lopes, A., Almeida, F.: A force-impedance controlled industrial robot using an active robotic auxiliary device. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 24(3), 299–309 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dai, H., Yuen, K.M., Elbestawi, M.A.: Parametric modelling and control of the robotic grinding process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 8(3), 182–192 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, J., Liu, G., Zang, X., et al.: A hybrid passive/active force control scheme for robotic belt grinding system. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tyapin, I., Kaldestad, K.B., Hovland, G.: Off-line path correction of robotic face milling using static tool force and robot stiffness. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots Systems. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Straub, B.M., Gerke, M., Pahl, M.: A systematic technique to estimate positioning errors for robot accuracy improvement using laser interferometry based sensing. Mech. Mach. Theory 40(8), 879–906 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klimchik, A., Pashkevich, A., Chablat, D., et al.: Compliance error compensation technique for parallel robots composed of non-perfect serial chains. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 29(2), 385–393 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dumas, C., Caro, S., Garnier, S., et al.: Joint stiffness identification of six-revolute industrial serial robots. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 27(4), 881–888 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klimchik, A., Ambiehl, A., Garnier, S., et al.: Efficiency evaluation of robots in machining applications using industrial performance measure. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 48, 12–29 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang, H., Gong, Z.M., Chen, X.Q., et al.: Robotic grinding and polishing for turbine-vane overhaul. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 127(2), 140–145 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, L., Ulrich, B.J., Elbestawi, M.A.: Robotic grinding force regulation: design, implementation and benefits. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 258–265. IEEE (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and TechnologyHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations