Advertisement

Force Modeling of Tool-Tissue Interaction Force During Suturing

  • Shuai Gao
  • Shijun Ji
  • Mei FengEmail author
  • Qiumeng Li
  • Xiuquan Lu
  • Zhixue Ni
  • Yan Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11745)

Abstract

A proper mechanical characterization of soft biological tissue has a great significance in the medical application, such as virtual reality simulators, surgery preoperative planning and the design of force feedback system for master-slave medical robot. To study the mechanical properties of soft tissue in suture operation, this paper divided the suture into three phases on basis of suture operation process, and conducted experiments to investigate the tool-tissue interactive forces, where the parameters related to suturing operation were considered in experiments design to guarantee the reliability of the experiment, and the force model of each phases was established according to the experimental statistical data. And verification experiments were conducted to evaluate the models by comparing the forces obtained by models with those by sensor. The results showed that the built force model agreed with the experimental data well. The proposed force models can be used to reflect the force variation during suture.

Keywords

Biomechanics Suture Tool-tissue interaction force Mechanical properties 

References

  1. 1.
    Hu, T., Lau, A.C.W., Desai, J.P.: Instrumentation for testing soft tissue undergoing large deformation: ex vivo and in vivo studies. J. Med. Devices 2(4), 561–576 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nava, A., Mazza, E., Kleinermann, F., et al.: Evaluation of the mechanical properties of human liver and kidney through aspiration experiments. Technol. Health Care 12(3), 269–280 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nava, A., Mazza, E., Furrer, M., et al.: In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver. Med. Image Anal. 12(2), 203 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barbé, L., Bayle, B., De Mathelin, M., et al.: Online robust model estimation and haptic clues detection during in vivo needle insertions (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schiavone, P., Chassat, F., Boudou, T., et al.: In vivo measurement of human brain elasticity using a light aspiration device. Med. Image Anal. 13(4), 673–678 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Leary, M.D., Simone, C., Washio, T., et al.: Robotic needle insertion: effects of friction and needle geometry. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, no 2, pp. 1774–1780 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fung, Y.C.: Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2257-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tong, P., Fung, Y.C.: The stress-strain relationship for the skin. J. Biomech. 9, 649–657 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brouwer, I., Ustin, J., Bentley, L., Sherman, A., Dhruv, N., Tendick, F.: Measuring in vivo animal soft tissue properties for haptic modeling in surgical simulation. Med. Meets Virtual Reality 9, 69–74 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ottensmeyer, M.P., Salisbury, J.K.: In vivo data acquisition instrument for solid organ mechanical property measurement. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, pp. 975–982. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45468-3_116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ottensmeyer, M.P., Kerdok, A.E., Howe, R.D., Dawson, S.L.: The effects of testing environment on the viscoelastic properties of soft tissues. In: Cotin, S., Metaxas, D. (eds.) ISMS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3078, pp. 9–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25968-8_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Okamura, A.M., Simone, C., O’Leary, M.D.: Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51(10), 1707–1716 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bao, X., Li, W., Lu, M., et al.: Experiment study on puncture force between MIS suture needle and soft tissue. Biosurface Biotribology 2(2), 49–58 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DiMaio, S.P., Salcudean, S.E.: Needle insertion modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics Automation, pp. 2098–2105 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samur, E., Sedef, M., Basdogan, C., et al.: A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response. Med. Image Anal. 11(4), 361 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahn, B., Kim, J.: Measurement and characterization of soft tissue behavior with surface deformation and force response under large deformations. Med. Image Anal. 14(2), 138–148 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xie, A., Fang, C., Huang, Y., et al.: Application of three-dimensional reconstruction and visible simulation technique in reoperation of hepatolithiasis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28(2), 248 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kataoka, H., Washio, T., Chinzei, K., Mizuhara, K., Simone, C., Okamura, A.M.: Measurement of the tip and friction force acting on a needle during penetration. In: Dohi, T., Kikinis, R. (eds.) MICCAI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2488, pp. 216–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45786-0_27CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Podder, T.K., Sherman, J., Messing, E.M., et al.: Needle insertion force estimation model using procedure-specific and patient-specific criteria. In: International Conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 555–558 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ziegel, E.R.: Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W.H. Freeman, New York (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuai Gao
    • 1
  • Shijun Ji
    • 1
  • Mei Feng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qiumeng Li
    • 1
  • Xiuquan Lu
    • 1
  • Zhixue Ni
    • 1
  • Yan Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Intelligent Precision ManufacturingJilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations