Advertisement

Bionic Design and Attitude Control Measurement in a Double Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicle

  • Xuedong Zhang
  • Huichao DengEmail author
  • Shengjie Xiao
  • Lili Yang
  • Xilun Ding
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11745)

Abstract

The interest in flapping-wing Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs) has been rising progressively in the past years, as they can combine high agility manoeuvres with precision hovering flight and can be applied in complex spaces for reconnaissance missions. In this study, we propose a double flapping-wing MAV, which has four wings comprised by two pairs, each pair is driven by one brush motor and one linear servo. The flapping mechanism is composed of a crank-rocker and double rocker mechanism, which can amplify the output angle of wings and used for lift increasing. We take the Rhinoceros beetle as a bionic object and the Weis-Fogh mechanism as the high lift generation principle. The vehicle can actively control 4 degrees of freedom (DOFs), namely, roll, pitch, yaw, and thrust. Compare to the single pair counterpart, our vehicle possess a high thrust-to-weight ratio, which make it possible for more onboard load and beneficial to attitude control, additionally, the 3 rotational DOFs (roll, pitch, and yaw) is completely uncoupled and controlled independently, which is useful for control system design. The currently vehicle weighting 32.8 g (without the battery) and can generate 0.34N thrust at the maximum flapping frequency of approximately 23 Hz.

Keywords

MAV Flapping-wing Weis-Fogh mechanism Thrust-to-weight ratio 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was primarily supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 73048001), Science & Technology Ministry of China (Grant number 2018YFB1304600).

References

  1. 1.
    Keennon, M., Klingebiel, K., Won, H.: Development of the nano hummingbird: a tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle. In: 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karásek, M., et al.: A tailless aerial robotic flapper reveals that flies use torque coupling in rapid banked turns. Science 361(6407), 1089–1094 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armanini, S.F., et al.: Modelling wing wake and tail aerodynamics of a flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 11, 1756829319833674 (2019)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Croon, G.C.H.E., et al.: Design, aerodynamics, and vision-based control of the DelFly. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 1(2), 71–97 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ma, K.Y., et al.: Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science 340(6132), 603–607 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wood, R.J.: The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Trans. Robot. 24(2), 341–347 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Finio, B.M., Wood, R.J.: Open-loop roll, pitch and yaw torques for a robotic bee. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teoh, Z.E., et al.: A hovering flapping-wing microrobot with altitude control and passive upright stability. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whitney, J.P., Wood, R.J.: Aeromechanics of passive rotation in flapping flight. J. Fluid Mech. 660, 197–220 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karásek, M., et al.: Pitch and roll control mechanism for a hovering flapping wing MAV. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 6(4), 253–264 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karásek, M., et al.: Pitch moment generation and measurement in a robotic hummingbird. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 5(4), 299–309 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karásek, M., Preumont, A.: Flapping flight stability in hover: a comparison of various aerodynamic models. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 4(3), 203–226 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roshanbin, A., et al.: COLIBRI: a hovering flapping twin-wing robot. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 9(4), 270–282 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karasek, M., Preumont, A.: Simulation of flight control of a hummingbird like robot near hover. Eng. Mech. 58, 322 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen, Q.-V., Chan, W.L.: Development and flight performance of a biologically-inspired tailless flapping-wing micro air vehicle with wing stroke plane modulation. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 14(1), 016015 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phan, H.V., Kang, T., Park, H.C.: Design and stable flight of a 21 g insect-like tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle with angular rates feedback control. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 12(3), 036006 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Truong, T., et al.: Experimental and numerical studies of beetle-inspired flapping wing in hovering flight. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 12(3), 036012 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Au, L.T.K., Phan, V.H., Park, H.C.: Longitudinal flight dynamic analysis on vertical takeoff of a tailless flapping-wing micro air vehicle. J. Bionic Eng. 15(2), 283–297 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Truong, T.N., Phan, H.V., Park, H.C.: Design and demonstration of a bio-inspired flapping-wing-assisted jumping robot. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 14, 036010 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou, W., Deng, H., Ding, X.: Bionic structure design of a flapping wing robot. In: Zhang, X., Wang, N., Huang, Y. (eds.) Mechanism and Machine Science. LNEE, vol. 408, pp. 101–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2875-5Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xiao, S., et al.: Optimization design of flapping mechanism of micro air vehicle based on matlab and adams. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO). IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen, Z., et al.: Structural integrity analysis of transmission structure in flapping-wing micro aerial vehicle via 3D printing. Eng. Failure Anal. 96, 18–30 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weis-Fogh, T.: Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. J. Exp. Biol. 59(1), 169–230 (1973)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lighthill, M.J.: On the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation. J. Fluid Mech. 60(1), 1–17 (1973)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weis-Fogh, T.: Unusual mechanisms for the generation of lift in flying animals. Sci. Am. 233(5), 80–87 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bennett, L.: Clap and fling aerodynamics-an experimental evaluation. J. Exp. Biol. 69(1), 261–272 (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuedong Zhang
    • 1
  • Huichao Deng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shengjie Xiao
    • 1
  • Lili Yang
    • 1
  • Xilun Ding
    • 1
  1. 1.Space Robot LaboratoryBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations