Neuroenhancement at Work: Addressing the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications
- 70 Downloads
Neuroenhancement is associated with a wide range of existing, emerging, and future biomedical technologies that are intended to improve human cognitive performance and mitigate—if not reverse—human error. Neuroenhancement in classrooms, universities, and the military has been discussed at length, but the workplace has been largely omitted from the conversation until now. By providing examples from branches of the commercial market that are rarely linked with cognitive enhancement in the literature, we argue that neuroenhancement at work is likely to become a major challenge in the labor market. Therefore, we focus here on the specific application of neuroenhancements to the workplace. Central issues involve both drugs and devices, some of which are well-trodden ethical concerns while others are novel challenges. We conclude with a brief discussion and outline of a discourage-use policy that has the potential to mitigate the challenges of neuroenhancement at work.
KeywordsNeuroenhancement at work Neuroethics
VD is supported by the Faculty Research and Professional Development program at NC State University. This project was also supported in part by Technical Safety BC, Vancouver, Canada (ICM and JI) and Neuroethics Canada. JI is Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics. Special thanks go to Abigail Scheper for her help with language editing and formatting.
- Academy of Medical Sciences. Human enhancement and the future of work. In: Joint report of the Academy of Medical Sciences, the British Academy, the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Royal Society. 2012. http://royalsociety.org/upload-edFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/human-enhancement/2012-11-06-Human-enhancement.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2012.
- Berka C, Levendowski DJ, Lumicao MN, Yau A, Davis G, Zivkovic VT, Olmstead RE, Tremoulet PD, Craven PL. EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2007;78(5):B231–44.Google Scholar
- Berlim MT, Van den Eynde F, Daskalakis ZJ. Clinically meaningful efficacy and acceptability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treating primary major depression: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(4):543.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- British Medical Association. Boosting your brainpower: ethical aspects of cognitive enhancements. A discussion paper from the British Medical Association. London: BMA; 2007.Google Scholar
- Caidwell Jr JA, Smythe III NK, Caidwell J, Hall KK, Norman DN. The effects of modafinil on aviator performance during 40 hours of continuous wakefulness: a UH-60 helicopter simulator study. Army Aeromedical Research Unit Fort Rucker Al; 1999. Report No.: 99-17.Google Scholar
- Coates McCall I, Illes J. Owning ethical innovation: claims about commercial brain wearable technologies. International Neuroethics Society Annual Meeting. 2018. Abstract submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Gersner R, Oberman L, Sanchez MJ, Chiriboga N, Kaye HL, Pascual-Leone A, Libenson M, Roth Y, Zangen A, Rotenberg A. H-coil repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy: a case report. Epilepsy Behav Case Rep. 2016;5:52–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Horvath JC, Forte JD, Carter O. Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia. 2015b;66:213–36.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Markets and Markets. Brain monitoring market by product (MRI, CT, PET, EEG, EMG, MEG, TCD, ICP, Electrodes, Sensors, Gels, Cables), procedure (invasive, non-invasive), disease (TBI, stroke, dementia, epilepsy) & end user (hospital, clinic, ASC, ambulance)—forecasts to 2021. 2017. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/brain-monitoring-devices-market-909.html?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIiPqg1e7l2wIVBGt-Ch1jYQewEAAYASAAEgLf6_D_BwE. Accessed 21 Jun 2018.
- Medical Bureau of Roadside Safety. Report on roadside drug testing and equipment and related matters. Dublin: Medical Bureau of Roadside Safety; 2012.Google Scholar
- NISSAN MOTOR Co., Ltd. Brain-to-Vehicle [Internet]. NISSAN|CORPORATE INFORMATION|Outline of Company TOP. [cited 2018 May 16]. Available from https://www.nissan-global.com/EN/TECHNOLOGY/OVERVIEW/b2v.html.
- Partridge B, Lucke J, Hall W. A comparison of attitudes toward cognitive enhancement and legalized doping in sport in a community sample of Australian adults. Am J Bioeth Primary Res. 2012;3(4):81–6.Google Scholar
- Pettey C. Wearables hold the key to connected health monitoring [Internet]. Gartner.com. 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 11]. Available from https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/wearables-hold-the-key-to-connected-health-monitoring/
- Roads and Track Authority [RTA]. Roadside drug testing. Sydney: New South Wales Centre for Road Safety. 2009. http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/heavyvehicles/downloads/hv_drug_testing_dl1.html. Accessed 2 May 2013.
- Science and Technology Options Assessment [STOA]. Human enhancement study. The Hague: Rathenau Institute; 2009.Google Scholar
- SmartCap Technologies. SmartCap Technologies|Measure Alertness. Eliminate Fatigue [Internet]. SmartCapTech. [cited 2018 Jun 11]. Available from https://www.smartcaptech.com/
- Snyder A. Explaining and inducing savant skills: privileged access to lower level, less-processed information. Philos Trans R Soc B 2009;364(1522):1399–405. Accessed 11 Apr 2013.Google Scholar
- Takabi H, Bhalotiya A, Alohaly M. Brain computer interface (BCI) applications: privacy threats and countermeasures. In Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC), 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference. 2016 Nov 1. IEEE. p. 102–11.Google Scholar
- Teplan M. Fundamental of EEG measurement. Meas Sci Rev. 2002;2(2):1–11.Google Scholar
- Utz KS, Dimova V, Oppenländer K, Kerkhoff G. Electrified minds: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology—a review of current data and future implications. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(10):2789–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wexler A. A pragmatic analysis of the regulation of consumer transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) devices in the United States. J Law Biosci. 2016;2(3):669–96.Google Scholar