‘Murder They Said’: A Content Analysis and Further Ethical Reflection on the Application of Neuroscience in Management
- 198 Downloads
In this chapter, we offer a content analysis of top-tier management journals to examine the extent to which advocates of neuroscience in management pay heed to the ethical ramifications of their work. Based upon our analysis, we are able to robustly refute the claim by Butler and colleagues (Hum Relat 70:1171–1190, 2017) that Lindebaum’s (Hum Relat 69(3):537–50, 2016) concerns about the lack of ethical concerns in the proliferation and application of neuroscientific ideas and measurements are basically much ado about nothing. By way of this content analysis, we advance the debate on the ethical ramifications of applying neuroscience in management by demonstrating (1) which ethical issues are recognised and (2) which ones are not. Doing so has the potential to open up new directions in studying the ethical and practical ramifications of neuroscience in and around workplaces.
KeywordsNeuroethics Content analysis Neuroscience Personhood Practice Work
- Ahlfors SP, Mody M. Overview of MEG. Organ Res Methods. 2016:1–21.Google Scholar
- Al-Amoudi I, Morgan J, editors. Realist responses to posthuman society. Ex Machina. New York: Routledge; 2018.Google Scholar
- Babbie E. The practice of social research. New York: Macmillan; 1992.Google Scholar
- Bagozzi RP, Lee N. Philosophical foundations of neuroscience in organizational research: functional and nonfunctional approaches. Organ Res Methods. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117697042.
- Bagozzi RP, Verbeke WJ, Dietvorst RC, Belschak FD, van den Berg WE, Rietdijk WJ. Theory of mind and empathic explanations of Machiavellianism a neuroscience perspective. J Manag. 2013;39(7):1760–98.Google Scholar
- Becker WJ, Cropanzano R. Organizational neuroscience: the promise and prospects of an emerging discipline. J Organ Behav. 2010;31(7):1055–9.Google Scholar
- Becker WJ, Cropanzano R, Sanfey AG. Organizational neuroscience: taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. J Manag. 2011;37(4):933–61.Google Scholar
- Bhabha HK. The location of culture. London: Routledge; 1994.Google Scholar
- Braeutigam S, Lee N, Senior C. A role for endogenous brain states in organizational research: moving toward a dynamic view of cognitive processes. Organ Res Methods.2017.Google Scholar
- Chan S, Harris J. Neuroethics. In: Brain waves module. 1: Neuroscience, society and policy. London: Royal Society; 2011.Google Scholar
- Christopoulos GI, Uy MA, Yap WJ. The body and the brain. Organ Res Methods. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116681073.
- ESRC. Framework for Research Ethics (FRE). 2010; http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2012.
- Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984/1967.Google Scholar
- Giordano J, Benedikter R. An early-and necessary-flight of the owl of Minerva: neuroscience, neurotechnology, human socio-cultural boundaries, and the importance of neuroethics. J Evol Technol. 2012;22(1):14–25.Google Scholar
- Harari Y. Homo deus. A short history of tomorrow. London: Harvill Secker; 2016.Google Scholar
- Jack AI, Rochford KC, Friedman JP, Passarelli AM, Boyatzis RE. Pitfalls in organizational neuroscience: a critical review and suggestions for future research. Organ Res Methods. 2017.Google Scholar
- Konovalov A, Krajbich I. Over a decade of neuroeconomics. Organ Res Methods. 2016;22(1):1–26.Google Scholar
- Lee N, Senior C, Butler MJR. The domain of organizational cognitive neuroscience. J Manag. 2012b;38(4):921–31.Google Scholar
- Massaro S, Pecchia L. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. Organ Res Methods. 2016;22(1):1–40.Google Scholar
- Molenberghs P, Prochilo G, Steffens NK, Zacher H, Haslam SA. The neuroscience of inspirational leadership: the importance of collective-oriented language and shared group membership. J Manag. 2015;43(7):2168–94.Google Scholar
- Nofal AM, Nicolaou N, Symeonidou N, Shane S. Biology and management: a review, critique, and research agenda. J Manag. 2018;44(1):7–31.Google Scholar
- Prakash G. Another reason. Science and the imagination of modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- Quaresima V, Ferrari M. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for assessing cerebral cortex function during human behavior in natural/social situations. Organ Res Methods. 2016.Google Scholar
- Slaby J, Choudhury S. Proposal for a critical neuroscience. In: Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience. London: Wiley Blackwell. 2012. p. 27–51.Google Scholar
- Spence C. Neuroscience-inspired design. Organ Res Methods. 2016:1–24. Google Scholar
- Veniero D, Strüber D, Thut G, Herrmann CS. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques can modulate cognitive processing. Organ Res Methods. 2016:1–32.Google Scholar
- Waldman DA, Wang D, Fenters V. The added value of neuroscience methods in organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2016b:1–27.Google Scholar