Advertisement

Teaching Toward Equity – Listening and Reading

  • Halvor Hoveid
  • Marit Honerød Hoveid
Chapter
  • 184 Downloads
Part of the Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education book series (COPT, volume 12)

Abstract

This chapter deliberates about the act of teaching in relation to power. From the model of teaching elaborated in Jacques Rancière’s book The Ignorant Schoolmaster, we develop an explanation of teaching as a relational practice. Based on the model of the didactic triangle presented in the introduction, our deliberation of the relational practice of teaching is an interrelation between the subject-matter and the distribution of this knowledge to the students. We show how this makes the act of teaching dependent of the teacher’s attention to her listening and her reading of her students’ participation in class.

To make the practice of teaching refer to the listening and reading of students’ acts and expressions, is to understand and explain how teaching makes sense of students. We argue that teaching must recognise students as persons already empowered with expressions of meaning and that this is a necessity for a teaching attentive to equity between all students.

Literature

  1. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1984). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement. Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO/London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse the language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, UK: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  4. Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The importance of what we care about. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hopmann, S. (1997). Wolfgang Klafki och den tyska didaktiken. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Didaktik. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  6. Hoveid, H., & Hoveid, M. H. (2013). The place of reading in the training of teachers. Ethics and Education, 8(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoveid, M. H. (2009). Læreres utdanning: et arbeid med personlig språkbruk. Pedagogisk filosofiskemedieringer om mulighetene for utvikling av praktisk fornuft gjennom arbeid med språkbruk [Teachers education – a work on personal language-use] (2009:133). Trondheim, Norway: Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet.Google Scholar
  8. Hoveid, M. H. (2010). «Å kunne lese» – en grunnleggende «ferdighet» av betydning for læreres læring [.»To be able to read» – a fundamental «skill» of significance for teacher learning]. Tidsskriftet FoU i praksis, 4(2), 43–58.Google Scholar
  9. Hoveid, M. H. (2012). A space for ‘who’ – A culture of ‘two’: Speculations related to an ‘in-between knowledge’. Ethics and Education, 7(3), 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoveid, M. H. (2018). Lærerdeltagelse – samtalene om det som skjedde. [Teacher participation – conversations about what happened]. In M. H. Hoveid, H. Hoveid, K. P. Longva, & Ø. Danielsen (Eds.), Undervisning som Veiledning [Teaching as menoring]. Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.Google Scholar
  11. Irigaray, L. (1996). I love to you. Sketch of a possible felicity within history (A. Martin, Trans.). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Irigaray, L. (2001). To be two (M. M. Rhodes & M. F. Cocito-Monoc, Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore/London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2013). In defense of school a public issue. Leuven, Belgium: E-ducation, Culture & Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. O’Donnell, A. (2015). Another relationship to failure: Reflections on beckett and education. In M. Griffiths, M. H. Hoveid, S. Todd, & C. Winter (Eds.), Re-imagining relationships in education. Ethics politics and practice. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and narrative (Vol. 3). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ricoeur, P. (1991). From text to action. Essays in hermeneutics, II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ricoeur, P. (Ed.). (1994). Oneself as another. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ricoeur, P. (2005). The course of recognition. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Säljø, R. (2001). Læring i praksis. Et sosiokulturelt perspektiv. Oslo, Norway: J.W. Cappelens Forlag.Google Scholar
  23. Todd, S. (2015). Between body and Spirit: The Limininality of pedagogical relationships. In M. Griffiths, M. H. Hoveid, S. Todd, & C. Winter (Eds.), Re-imagining relationships in education. Ethics, politics and practices. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. von Oettingen, A. (2016) Almendidaktik, mellom normativitet of evidens [General didactics, between normativity and evidence]. Copenhagen, Denmark/Latvia: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  25. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Halvor Hoveid
    • 1
  • Marit Honerød Hoveid
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Teacher EducationNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Department of Education and Lifelong LearningNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations