Advertisement

Introduction

  • Halvor Hoveid
  • Marit Honerød Hoveid
Chapter
  • 203 Downloads
Part of the Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education book series (COPT, volume 12)

Abstract

This is a book arguing for teaching as the driver of education. To pay attention to teaching is to pay attention to that which is inside the system of education. To consider education as a mediation of knowledge between generations places teaching as acts performing the content of education, in a class in a school. To deliberate about teaching must be based on historicity, we argue. The support for this argument builds on a reading of the French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, well known in Europe and for is work in universities in USA.

Making education educational is an argument for reflexivity in the act of teaching. To be reflexive in teaching is to acknowledge that intentions guides the acts of teaching. Teaching, we argue, must create attention towards processes of collectivity in the classroom. Today, teaching is both acts expressing knowledge and acts securing justice to all students through a mediation of knowledge. Teaching therefore expresses both knowledge with reference to school subjects, and justice according to the distribution of this knowledge.

Literature

  1. Arendt, H. (1965). Eichmann in Jerusalem. A report on the banality of evil. New York: The Viking Press Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker D. A. (2014). Introduction to research in education, edition 9 (International Ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadeworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  3. Bergson, H. (1991). Matter and memory. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO/London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Biesta, G. (2017). The rediscovery of teaching. New York/London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biesta, G., & Säfström, C. A. (2011). A manifesto for education. Policy Futures in Education, 5(5), 540–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale, E. L. (1986). Oppdragelse fri fra “mor” og “far”. Pedagogikkens grunnlag i det moderne samfunn [Uppbringing free fom «mother» and «father»] (The foundations of pedagogy in modern society). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag A/S.Google Scholar
  9. Hirsch, E. D., Kett, J. F., & Trefil, J. (2002). The new dictionary of cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Hogan, P. (2010). The new significance of learning. Imagination’s heartwork. London/New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  11. Hopmann, S. (1997). Wolfgang Klafki och den tyska didaktiken. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Didaktik. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  12. Hoveid, M. H. (2010). «Å kunne lese» – en grunnleggende «ferdighet» av betydning for læreres læring [.»To be able to read» – a fundamental «skill» of significance for teacher learning]. Tidsskriftet FoU i praksis, 4(2), 43–58.Google Scholar
  13. Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. OECD, Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). Universal basic skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ricoeur, P. (1978). The rule of Metaphor. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  17. Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge/New York/Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ricoeur, P. (1991). From text to action. Essays in hermeneutics, II. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ricoeur, P. (Ed.). (1994). Oneself as another. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ricoeur, P. (2005). The course of recognition. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Säfström, C. A. (2017). Undervisning som pedagogisk relasjon. In H. Sæverot & T. C. Werler (Eds.), Pedagogikkens språk. Kunnskapsformer i pedagogikkvitenskap. [The language of pedagogy. Knowledgeforms in the science of pedagogy (education)]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS.Google Scholar
  23. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lesson: What can the world learn form educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sassen, S. (2014). Expulsions. Brutality and complexity in the global economy. Cambridge, MA/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. von Oettingen, A. (2017). Almen didaktik eller kunsten at undervise [General didactics or the art of teaching]. In H. Sæverot & T. C. Werler (Eds.), Pedagogikkens språk. Kunnskapsformer i pedagogikkvitenskap. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS.Google Scholar
  26. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Winter, C. (2014). Curriculum knowledge, justice, relations: The schools white paper (2010) in England. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(2), 276–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Halvor Hoveid
    • 1
  • Marit Honerød Hoveid
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Teacher EducationNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Department of Education and Lifelong LearningNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations