Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Challenge of Strategic Communication in Multinational Military Operations: Approaches by the United States and Germany in the ISAF

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communication, Interpreting and Language in Wartime

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Languages at War ((PASLW))

Abstract

No previous multinational military operation compared in size and interculturality to the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF). The increased scope brought with it new challenges. This chapter explores how differentiating narratives were employed by member states to legitimise their political actions to their domestic constituencies, through the example of the base narratives of the United States and Germany. The study employs the methodology of frame analysis to understand if and how a country’s base narrative influenced that country’s communicational themes during the ISAF mission. A base narrative inherently determines how a country will legitimise military action, but at the same time is unique to a particular country. This potentially makes it impossible to build a comprehensive communication strategy for all members of a multinational military operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A term that in itself might very well be a point of contention. Peacekeeping missions were in their inception very much defined by their impartial character and the fact that they were not allowed to employ force. In the twenty-first century, as international actors became more heavily involved in global conflicts, the character of peacekeeping missions morphed into an increasingly active role, more akin to an international police force. Alexandra Novosseloff (2016), ‘Emily Paddon Rhoads: “Taking Sides”: The Challenges of Impartiality in UN Peace Keeping Operations’, Peace Operations Review https://peaceoperationsreview.org/interviews/emily-paddon-rhoads-taking-sides-the-challenges-of-impartiality-in-un-peacekeeping-operations/. Accessed 12 March 2019.

  2. 2.

    Hubert Knoblauch (2000), ‘Der Krieg, Der Diskurs Und Die Paranoia Der Macht. Michel Foucaults Verteidigung Der Gesellschaft’, Soziologische Revue 23:3, pp. 263–68, here p. 266.

  3. 3.

    Susanne Kirchhoff (2010), Krieg mit Metaphern: Mediendiskurse über 9/11 und den “War on Terror” (Bielefeld: Transcript-Verl), p. 47.

  4. 4.

    Altschull, cited in Kirchhoff, Krieg mit Metaphern, p. 65.

  5. 5.

    Kirchhoff, Krieg mit Metaphern, p. 6.

  6. 6.

    Chris Baraniuk (2018), “How Twitter Bots Help Fuel Political Feuds” scientificamerican.com . https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-twitter-bots-help-fuel-political-feuds/. Accessed 12 March 2019.

  7. 7.

    Shanto Iyengar (2011), Media Politics: A Citizen’s Guide. 2nd ed. (New York: W. W. Norton & Co), p. 232.

  8. 8.

    Ian Stewart and Susan L. Carruthers (eds) (1996), War, Culture, and the Media: Representations of the Military in twentieth Century Britain. (Trowbridge, UK: Flicks Books), p. 2.

  9. 9.

    Kirchhoff, Krieg mit Metaphern, p. 15.

  10. 10.

    Erin Sahlstein Parcell and Lynne M. Webb (eds) (2015), A Communication Perspective on the Military: Interactions, Messages, and Discourses. (New York: Peter Lang), p. 162.

  11. 11.

    Iyengar, Media Politics: A Citizen’s Guide, p. 232.

  12. 12.

    Stewart and Carruthers, War, Culture, and the Media, p. 2.

  13. 13.

    Kirchhoff, Krieg mit Metaphern, p. 50.

  14. 14.

    James Burk (2002), ‘Theory of Democratic Civil-Military Relations’, Armed Forces & Society 29:1, pp. 7–29, here p. 7.

  15. 15.

    Athina Karatzogianni (ed.) (2012), Violence and War in Culture and the Media: Five Disciplinary Lenses. (London: Routledge), p. 144.

  16. 16.

    Rashed Uz Zaman (2009), ‘Strategic Culture: A “Cultural” Understanding of War’, Comparative Strategy 28:1, pp. 68–88, here p. 68.

  17. 17.

    Andrew J. Bacevich (2013), The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War. Updated edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 23.

  18. 18.

    Service members commonly receive benefits such as priority boarding and reduced prices on different goods, and in public discussion their voice is often elevated to a higher moral ground.

  19. 19.

    Robert L. Ivie (2005), ‘Savagery in Democracy’s Empire’, Third World Quarterly 26:1, pp. 55–65.

  20. 20.

    Robert N. Bellah (1988), ‘Civil Religion in America’, Daedalus, pp. 97–118, here p. 99.

  21. 21.

    Cecilia Elizabeth O’Leary (1999), To Die for: The Paradox of American Patriotism. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), p. 15.

  22. 22.

    Raymond F. Bulman (1991), ‘“Myth of Origin,” Civil Religion and Presidential Politics’, Journal of Church and State, 33:3, pp. 525–39, here p. 535.

  23. 23.

    Bulman, ‘“Myth of Origin,” Civil Religion and Presidential Politics’, p. 535.

  24. 24.

    Coles (2002), ‘Manifest Destiny Adapted for 1990s’ War Discourse’, Sociology of Religion, 63:4, pp. 403–26, here p. 406.

  25. 25.

    Coles, ‘Manifest Destiny Adapted for 1990s’ War Discourse’, p. 416.

  26. 26.

    Stephen M. Walt (2011), ‘The Myth of American Exceptionalism’, Foreign Policy, 11, https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/the-myth-of-american-exceptionalism/. Accessed 12 March 2019.

  27. 27.

    Coles, ‘Manifest Destiny Adapted for 1990s’ War Discourse’, p. 403.

  28. 28.

    Ivie, ‘Savagery in Democracy’s Empire’, p. 202.

  29. 29.

    Bacevich, The New American Militarism, p. 97.

  30. 30.

    Bacevich, The New American Militarism, p. 97.

  31. 31.

    Bacevich, The New American Militarism, p. 122.

  32. 32.

    Bacevich, The New American Militarism, p. 122.

  33. 33.

    Konrad Hugo Jarausch and Michael Geyer (2003), Shattered Past: Reconstructing German Histories. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), p. 39.

  34. 34.

    Jarausch and Geyer, Shattered Past: Reconstructing German Histories, p. 101.

  35. 35.

    Jarausch and Geyer, Shattered Past: Reconstructing German Histories, p. 46.

  36. 36.

    Wulf Kansteiner (2006), In Pursuit of German Memory: History, Television, and Politics after Auschwitz. 1st ed. (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press).

  37. 37.

    Leslie A. Adelson (2000), ‘Touching Tales of Turks, Germans, and Jews: Cultural Alterity, Historical Narrative, and Literary Riddles for the 1990s’, New German Critique, 80 https://doi.org/10.2307/488635, pp. 93–124.

  38. 38.

    Jarausch and Geyer, Shattered Past, p. 9.

  39. 39.

    Wulf Kansteiner, In Pursuit of German Memory, pp. 4–5.

  40. 40.

    Thomas U. Berger (1998), Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), p. 194.

  41. 41.

    Thomas Risse (2004), ‘Kontinuität Durch Wandel: Eine “neue” deutsche Außenpolitik’, Aus Politik Und Zeitgeschichte, 11, pp. 24–31, here p. 28.

  42. 42.

    Romy Froehlich and Burkhard Rüdiger (2006), ‘Framing Political Public Relations: Measuring Success of Political Communication Strategies in Germany’, Public Relations Review, 32:1, pp. 18–25, here p. 20.

  43. 43.

    Froehlich and Rüdiger, ‘Framing Political Public Relations’, p. 20.

  44. 44.

    Ervin Goffman (1974), Frame Anlysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. (New York, NY: Harper & Row).

  45. 45.

    Froehlich and Rüdiger, ‘Framing Political Public Relations’, p. 20.

  46. 46.

    Froehlich and Rüdiger, ‘Framing Political Public Relations’, p. 20.

  47. 47.

    Froehlich and Rüdiger, ‘Framing Political Public Relations’, p. 20.

  48. 48.

    Froehlich and Rüdiger, ‘Framing Political Public Relations’, p. 20.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Independent Scholar, Berlin, Germany

    Jasmin Gabel

Authors
  1. Jasmin Gabel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Australian National Dictionary Centre, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Amanda Laugesen

  2. School of Humanities and Communication, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

    Richard Gehrmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gabel, J. (2020). The Challenge of Strategic Communication in Multinational Military Operations: Approaches by the United States and Germany in the ISAF. In: Laugesen, A., Gehrmann, R. (eds) Communication, Interpreting and Language in Wartime. Palgrave Studies in Languages at War. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27037-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27037-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27036-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27037-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation