Abstract
Symbolic reasoning systems have leveraged propositional logic frameworks to build diagnostics tools capable of describing complex artifacts, while also allowing for a controlled and efficacious search over failure modes. These diagnostic systems represent a complex and varied context in which to explore general intelligence. This paper explores the application of a different reasoning system to such frameworks, specifically, the Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System. It shows how statements can be built describing an artifact, and that NARS is capable of diagnosing abnormal states within examples of said artifact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brusoni, V., Console, L., Terenziani, P., Dupré, D.T.: A spectrum of definitions for temporal model-based diagnosis. Artif. Intell. 102(1), 39–79 (1998)
Ceriani, L., Zanella, M.: Model-based diagnosis and generation of hypothesis space via AI planning. In: 25th International Workshop on the Principles of Diagnosis (DX-14) (2014)
Console, L., Torasso, P.: A spectrum of logical definitions of model-based diagnosis1. Comput. Intell. 7(3), 133–141 (1991)
De Kleer, J.: An assumption-based TMS. Artif. Intell. 28(2), 127–162 (1986)
Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Jannach, D., Stumptner, M.: Consistency-based diagnosis of configuration knowledge bases. Artif. Intell. 152(2), 213–234 (2004)
Hammer, P., Lofthouse, T., Wang, P.: The OpenNARS implementation of the non-axiomatic reasoning system. In: Steunebrink, B., Wang, P., Goertzel, B. (eds.) AGI -2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9782, pp. 160–170. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41649-6_16
ohan de Kleer, J., Williams, B.C.: Diagnosis with behavioral modes. Proc. IJ CAI 1(989), 1324–1330 (1989)
de Kleer, J., Williams, B.C.: Diagnosing multiple faults. Artif. Intell. 32(1), 97–130 (1987)
Koitz, R., Wotawa, F.: SAT-based abductive diagnosis. In: International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, vol. 26, p. 10 (2015)
McCarthy, J.: Applications of circumscription to formalizing common-sense knowledge. Artif. Intell. 28(1), 89–116 (1986)
Peng, Y., Reggia, J.A.: Abductive Inference Models for Diagnostic Problem-Solving. Springer, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8682-5
Reiter, R.: A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artif. Intell. 32(1), 57–95 (1987)
ten Teije, A., van Harmelen, F.: An extended spectrum of logical definitions for diagnostic systems. In: Proceedings of DX-94 Fifth International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, pp. 334–342 (1994)
Wang, P.: Rigid Flexibility: The Logic of Intelligence. Springer, Dordrecht (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5045-3
Wang, P.: Non-Axiomatic Logic: A Model of Intelligent Reasoning. World Scientific, Singapore (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Power, B., Li, X., Wang, P. (2019). Generalized Diagnostics with the Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System (NARS). In: Hammer, P., Agrawal, P., Goertzel, B., Iklé, M. (eds) Artificial General Intelligence. AGI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11654. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27005-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27005-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27004-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27005-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)