Abstract
The world has recognized the role and significance of innovation for the economic and social development and national prosperity. The primary players involved in synergizing the innovative capabilities and outcomes for establishing a knowledge-based ecosystem are industries, universities, and government. The partnerships between industry, university and government create opportunities to translate the fundamental research into value-driven products and services. The mechanism of these partnerships has evolved over time—from statist and Laissez faire to the modern triple helix model , where the roles of industries, universities and government are balanced but interdependent and supportive of each other. The key drivers of knowledge-intensive development include institutional and cultural settings, legislations or regulations, support programs, and the promotional structures and mechanisms. Besides introducing the triple helix model and the drivers of knowledge ecosystem, this chapter will present the objectives, motivations, and the organization of chapters in this book.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abduljawad, H. (2015). Challenges in cultivating knowledge in university-industry-government partnerships—Qatar as a case study. The Muslim World, 105(1), 58–77.
Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A. C. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities—A survey and statistical analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1–2), 199–232.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). The triple helix of university-industry-government: Implications for policy and evaluation. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The+Triple+Helix+of+University+-+Industry+-+Government+Implications+for+Policy+and+Evaluation&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government innovation in action. London: Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H., Gulbrandsen, M., & Levitt, J. (2000). Public venture capital: Government funding sources for technology entrepreneurs. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Larédo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441–456.
Manley, K. (2002). The systems approach to innovation studies. AJIS, 9(2), 95–102.
Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 55–65.
Mansfield, E., & Lee, J.-Y. (1996). The modern university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, 25, 1047–1058.
Mohtar, R. H. (2015). Opportunities and challenges for innovations in Qatar. The Muslim World, 105(1), 46–57.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1/2), 115–127.
OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2002). Benchmarking science-industry relationships. Paris: OECD.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423–442.
Polt, W., Gassler, H., Schibany, A., Rammer, C., & Schartinger, D. (2001). Benchmarking industry-science relations: The role of framework conditions. Science Public Policy, 28(4), 247–258.
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry & Higher Education, 27(3), 237–262.
Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2014). Articulating the ‘three-missions’ in Spanish universities. Research Policy, 43, 1760–1773.
Siegel, D. L., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27–48.
Sleuwaegen, L., & Boiardi, P. (2014). Creativity and regional innovation: Evidence from EU regions. Research Policy, 43, 1508–1522.
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2006). Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy, 35, 1569–1585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nawaz, W., Koç, M. (2020). Introduction to Industry, University, and Government Partnerships: Theoretical Model . In: Industry, University and Government Partnerships for the Sustainable Development of Knowledge-Based Society. Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26799-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26799-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26798-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26799-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)