Skip to main content

Elite Theory and the American Political Directorate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 259 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I argue that Elite Theory rather than Marxism is the most appropriate framework for understanding our ruling elites during the period. I survey the basic tenets of American Elite Theory: that ruling elites maintain their legitimacy by promoting an ideology that justifies their rule, by embodying to some degree the values and aspirations of those below them in the class system, and by rejuvenating themselves to some extent by being open to new members. And I explain my key concepts: “power” as a function of influential social roles and the “political elite” as dominated by members of the top three social classes: Old Money, New Money, and the upper-middle class. I argue that while the various factions of our ruling elite represent very different interests and are thus not strictly speaking a hegemonic oligarchy, until recently they have tended to share power and not directly attacked their opponents’ interests. However, beginning in the 1970s, reactionary factions of the Republican Party began to work systematically to take control of the political directorate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Wright (1977, 67–71) on the difficulties of using the basic Marxist notion of “mode of production” to account for work in a governmental bureaucracy.

  2. 2.

    For an extended argument about the implications of elite rule in America, see Dye and Zeigler (1996).

  3. 3.

    As far as I know, there is no solid sociological research on whether the lifestyle of Old Money has changed since the 1980s. However, popular notions of what it means to be a member of Old Money do not seem to have changed much. See, for example, Rosenthal et al. (2018).

  4. 4.

    A number of recent studies (Reeves 2017; Stewart 2018) have argued that since the 1970s the wealthiest 20 percent of households, outside the top 1 percent, now constitute a new force in American culture, hoarding their privileges at the expense of the lower classes and forming a new aristocracy. These households contain at least one credentialed manager or professional. Perrucci and Wysong (2008, 31) go so far as to argue that this privileged top 20 percent have turned America into a two-class society: an upper privileged class and a lower “new working class,” although Perucci and Wysong label the top segment of the new working class as “comfortable.” This group includes “school teachers, civil servants, social workers, nurses, some small-business owners, and skilled unionized carpenters, machinists, or electricians.” The evidence for the “top 20 percent” does help explain increasing inequality in the United States since the 1970s, but it does not fundamentally change how we should conceptualize the ruling elite. The “top 20 percent,” not counting the very top 1 percent, includes those who have been traditionally labeled “upper-middle class” and New Money, two of the three groups that have historically constituted the ruling elite.

References

  • Aldrich, Nelson W., Jr. 1989. Old Money: The Mythology of America’s Upper Class. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltzell, E. Bigby. 1964. The Protestant Establishment: Autocracy and Class in America. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, Philip H. 1981. Elites in American History. Vol. 3. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, Dalton. 2008. Reading Class Between the Lines (of This Volume): A Reflection on Why We Should Stick to Folk Concepts of Social Class. In Social Class: How Does It Work? ed. Annette Lareau and Dalton Conley, 366–373. New York: Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. William. 1983. Who Rules America? A View for the 80s. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Who Rules America? Power, Politics, and Social Change. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Thomas R. 2002. Who’s Running America? The Bush Restoration. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Thomas R., and Harmon Zeigler. 1996. The Irony of Democracy. 10th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, Adam, et al. 2006. Power and Perspectives Not Taken. Psychological Science 17 (12): 1068–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbach, Jacob M. 2015. Does the American Dream Matter for Members of Congress? Social Class Background and Roll Call Votes. Political Research Quarterly 68 (2): 306–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Christopher. 2012. Twilight of the Elites: America After Meritocracy. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, Joseph A., and Kingsley Davis. 1957. The American Class Structure. New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Suzanne. 1963. Beyond the Ruling Class: Strategic Elites in Modern Societies. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerbo, Harold R. 2000. Social Stratification and Inequality: Class Conflict in Historical, Comparative, and Global Perspective. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapham, Lewis H. 1988. Money and Class in America: Notes and Observations on Our Civil Religion. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, Annette. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Robert, Althea Nagai, and Stanley Rothman. 1996. American Elites. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1887. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. Trans. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1956. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. Trans. Martin Milligan. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1964. German Ideology. Trans. Clemens Dutt, W. Lough, and C. P. Magill. Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, Stephen J., and Robert K. Miller Jr. 2009. The Meritocracy Myth. 2nd ed. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Trans. Eden and Cedar Paul. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Ruth. 1975. The President’s Cabinet, 1897–1972. Insurgent Sociologist 5 (3): 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, Larry, Jared Bernstein, and Sylvia Allegretto. 2007. The State of Working America 2006/2007. Ithaca: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosca, Gaetano. 1939. The Ruling Class, ed. Arthur Livingston. Trans. Hannah D. Kahn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, Vilfredo. 1935. Mind and Society. Trans. Andrew Bongiorno and Arthur Livingston. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrucci, Robert, and Earl Wysong. 2008. The New Class Society: Goodbye American Dream? 3rd ed. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, Kenneth, and Alan Stone. 1973. The Ruling Elites: Elite Theory, Power, and American Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Richard. 2017. Dream Hoarders: How the American Upper Middle Class Is Leaving Everyone Else in the Dust, Why That Is a Problem, and What to Do About It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, Katie. 2017. ‘I Wish You Bad Luck.’ Read Supreme Court Justice John Roberts’ Unconventional Speech to His Son’s Graduating Class. Time, June 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Jeff, et al. 2018. What Are the Characteristics of Old Money East-Coast Culture? Quora. Thread from 2012 to 2018. https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-characteristics-of-old-money-East-Coast-culture

  • Stewart, Matthew. 2018. The Birth of a New Aristocracy. Atlantic Monthly 321 (5): 48–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, Jeffrey A., and Benjamin I. Page. 2009. Oligarchy in the United States? Perspectives on Politics 7 (4): 731–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erin Olin. 1977. Rethinking, Once Again, the Concept of Class Structure. In Reworking Class, ed. John R. Hall, 41–78. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweigenhaft, Richard L., and G. William Domhoff. 2006. Diversity in the Power Elite. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Smit .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smit, D. (2019). Elite Theory and the American Political Directorate. In: Power and Class in Political Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26769-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics