Foreign Direct Investment, Domestic Investment and Green Growth in Nigeria: Any Spillovers?

  • Akintoye V. AdejumoEmail author
  • Simplice A. Asongu
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)


Globally, investments in physical and human capital have been identified to foster real economic growth and development in any economy. Investments, which could be domestic or foreign, have been established in the literature as either complements or substitutes in varying scenarios. While domestic investments bring about endogenous growth processes, foreign investment, though may be exogenous to growth, has been identified to bring about productivity and ecological spillovers. In view of these competing–conflicting perspectives, this chapter, examines the differential impacts of domestic and foreign investments on green growth in Nigeria during the period 1970–2017. The empirical evidence is based on Auto-regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) and Granger causality estimates. Also, the study articulates the prospects for growth sustainability via domestic or foreign investments in Nigeria. The results show that domestic investment increases CO2 emissions in the short run while foreign investment decreases CO2 emissions in the long run. When the dataset is decomposed into three sub-samples in the light of cycles of investments within the trend analysis, findings of the third sub-sample (i.e. 2001–2017) reveal that both types of investments decrease CO2 emissions in the long run while only domestic investment has a negative effect on CO2 emissions in the short run. This study therefore concludes that as short-run distortions even out in the long-run, FDI and domestic investments has prospects for sustainable development in Nigeria through green growth.


Investments Productivity Sustainability Growth 


  1. Adams S (2009) Foreign direct investment, domestic investment, and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Policy Model 31(6):939–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agosin MR, Machado R (2005) Foreign investment in developing countries: does it crowd in domestic investment? Oxf Dev Stud 33(2):149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aitken BJ, Harrison AE (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. Am Econ Re 89(3):605–618, 75:131–150Google Scholar
  4. Alege PO, Ogundipe AA (2015) Environmental quality and economic growth in Nigeria: a fractional cointegration analysis. Int J Dev Sustain 2(2)Google Scholar
  5. Al-Mulali U, Tang CF (2013) Investigating the validity of pollution haven hypothesis in the gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries. Energy Policy 60:813–819Google Scholar
  6. Aliyu MA (2005, June) Foreign direct investment and the environment: pollution haven hypothesis revisited. In: Eight annual conference on global economic analysis. Lübeck, Germany (pp. 9–11)Google Scholar
  7. Asghari M (2013) Does FDI promote MENA Region’s environmental quality? Pollution halo or pollution have hypothesis. Int J Sci Res Soc Sci (6):92–100Google Scholar
  8. Asongu SA (2014a) Correcting inflation with financial dynamic fundamentals: which adjustments matter in Africa? J Afr Bus 15(1):64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Asongu SA (2014b) Does money matter in Africa? New empirics on long- and short-run effects of monetary policy on output and prices. Indian Growth Dev Rev 7(2):142–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Asongu SA (2014c) Linkages between investment flows and financial development: causality evidence from selected African countries. Afr J Econ Manag Stud 5(3):269–299Google Scholar
  11. Asongu SA, El-Montasser G, Toumi H (2016) Testing the relationships between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in 24 African countries: a panel ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(7):6563–6573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Asongu SA (2018) CO2 emission thresholds for inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Sci Pollut Res.
  13. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Chomsisengphet S (2002) Stability of M2 money demand function in industrial countries. Appl Econ 34(16):2075–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Balasubramanyam VN, Salisu M, Sapsford D (1996) Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. Econ J, 92–105Google Scholar
  15. Barrel R, Pain N (1999) The growth of foreign direct investment in Europe. In: Barrel R, Pain N (eds) Innovation, investment and diffusion of technology in Europe: German direct investment and economic growth in Postwar Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 19–43Google Scholar
  16. Beak J, Koo WW (2009) A dynamic approach to FDI-environment nexus: the case of China and India. J Int Econ Stud 13(2):1598–2769Google Scholar
  17. Bende-Nabende A (2017) Globalisation, FDI, regional integration and sustainable development: theory, evidence and policy. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Blomström M, Kokko A (1998) Multinational corporations and spillovers. J Econ Surv 12(2):1–31Google Scholar
  19. Borensztein E, De Gregorio J, Lee JW (1998) How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? 1. J Int Econ 45(1):115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boyd JH, Smith BD (1992) Intermediation and equilibrium allocation of investment capital: implication for economic development. J Monetary Econ, 409–432Google Scholar
  21. Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM (1975) Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relations over time. J Roy Stat Soc B 37:149–163Google Scholar
  22. Choe JI (2003) Do foreign direct investment and gross domestic investment promote economic growth? Rev Dev Econ 7(1):44–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chow G (1960) Test of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28:591–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cole MA (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol Econ 48(1):71–81Google Scholar
  25. Cole MA, Elliott RJ, Zhang J (2011) Growth, foreign direct investment, and the environment: evidence from Chinese cities. J Reg Sci 51(1):121–138Google Scholar
  26. Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit 42(1):7–71Google Scholar
  27. Crespo N, Fontoura MP (2007) Determinant factors of FDI spillovers—what do we really know? World Dev 35(3):410–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Damijan JP, Knell M, Majcen B, Rojec M (2003) The role of FDI, R&D accumulation and trade in transferring technology to transition countries: evidence from firm panel data for eight transition countries. Econ Syst 27(2):189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Mello Jr LR (1997) Foreign direct investment in developing countries and growth: a selective survey. J Dev Stud 34(1):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: J Econometric Soc 1057–1072Google Scholar
  31. Dollar D (1992) Outward oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–85. Econ Dev Cult Change 40:523–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Engle R, Granger C (1987) Cointegration and error correction representation: estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eskeland GS, Harrison AE (2003) Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. J Dev Econ 70:1–23Google Scholar
  34. Feder G (1983) On exports and economic growth. J Dev Econ 12(1–2):59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Girma S, Greenaway D, Wakelin K (2001) Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK? Scott J Polit Econ 48(2):119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grimes P, Kento J (2003) Exporting the greenhouse: foreign capital penetration and CO2 emissions 1980–1996. J World-Syst Res (2):261–275Google Scholar
  37. Grossman G, Krueger A (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No. 3194, NBER, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quart J Econ 110:353–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Görg H, Greenaway D (2004) Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Res Observer 19(2):171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37(3):1156–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hansen BE (1992) Tests for parameter instability in regressions with I(1) processes. J Bus Econ Stat 10:321–335Google Scholar
  42. Hansen H, Johansen S (1993) Recursive estimation in cointegrated VAR-models, vol 1. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, University of Copenhagen, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  43. He J (2006) Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: the case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese province. Ecol Econ 60:228–245Google Scholar
  44. Herzer D, Klasen S, Nowak-Lehmann FD (2008) In search of FDI-led growth in developing countries: The way forward. Econ Model 25:793–810Google Scholar
  45. Hoffmann R, Lee CG, Ramasamy B, Yeung M (2005) FDI and pollution: a granger causality test using panel data. J Int Dev: J Dev Stud Assoc 17(3):311–317Google Scholar
  46. Hsiao C, Shen Y (2003) Foreign direct investment and economic growth: the importance of institutions and urbanization. Econ Dev Cult Change 51(4):883–896Google Scholar
  47. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johansen S (1996) Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector auto regressive models. Oxford University Press, Oxford, SecondedGoogle Scholar
  49. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keho Y (2016) Trade openness and the impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions: econometric evidence from ECOWAS countries. J Econ Sustain Dev 17(18). ISSN (Paper)2222-1700; ISSN (Online)2222-2855Google Scholar
  51. Kivyiro P, Arminen H (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy 74:595–606Google Scholar
  52. Lall S (1980) Vertical inter-firm linkages in LDCs: an empirical study. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 42(3):203–226Google Scholar
  53. Lee GC (2010) Foreign direct investment pollution and economic growth: evidence from Malaysia. Appl Econ 41:1709–1716Google Scholar
  54. Lee JW (2013) The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy 55:483–489Google Scholar
  55. Lin P, Saggi K (2004) Multinational firms and backward linkages: a survey and a simple model. Unpublished manuscript, Lingnan University and Southern Methodist UniversityGoogle Scholar
  56. Lipsey RE (2003) Home and host country effects of FDI. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA) Working PaperNo. 9293, October 2002Google Scholar
  57. Makki SS, Somwaru A (2004) Impact of foreign direct investment and trade on economic growth: evidence from developing countries. Am J Agr Econ 86(3):795–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Maku O, Adegboyega ES, Oyelade AO (2018) The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emission in Nigeria (1980–2014). Int J Sci Eng Res 9(2):2061. ISSN 2229-5518Google Scholar
  59. Markusen J, Venables A (1999) Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):335–356Google Scholar
  60. OECD (2010) Organisation for economic co-operation and development. Interim Report of the green growth strategy: implementing our commitment for a sustainable future. OECD Publishing, 2010Google Scholar
  61. Omri A, Kahouli B (2014) The nexus between foreign investment, domestic capital and economic growth: empirical evidence from the MENA region. Res Econ 68:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Omri A, Nguyen DK, Rault C (2014) Causal interactions between CO2 emissions, FDI, and economic growth: Evidence from dynamic simultaneous equation models. Econ Model 42:382–389Google Scholar
  63. Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econometrics 16(3):289–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Phillip PC, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I (1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57(1):99–125Google Scholar
  65. Phillip PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75(2):335–346Google Scholar
  66. Porter M (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci Am 264(4):168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Porter M, van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Palmer K et al (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefits-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9(4):119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. WEP 2-22 Working Paper No. 238, International Labour Office, Technology and Employment Programme, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  70. Pao HT, Tsai CM (2011) Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy 36(5):2450–2458Google Scholar
  71. Ram R (1985) Exports and economic growth: some additional evidence. Econ Dev Cult Change 33(2):415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rodrıguez-Clare A (1996) Multinationals, linkages, and economic development. Am Econ Rev 86(4):852–873Google Scholar
  73. Rodriguez F, Rodrik D (1999) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-country evidence. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  74. Salvatore D, Hatcher T (1991) Inward oriented and outward oriented trade strategies. J Dev Stud 27(3):7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sachs J, Werner A (1995) Economic reform and the process of global integration. Brookings Papers Econ Act 1:1–118Google Scholar
  76. Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Abbas F, Anis O (2015) Does foreign direct investment impede environmental quality in high-, middle-, and low-income countries? Energy Econ 51:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smarzynska BK, Wei SJ (2001) Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty sector or popular myth? NBER Working Paper No. 8465Google Scholar
  78. Smarzynska Javorcik B (2004) Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. Am Econ Rev 94(3):605–627.
  79. Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39(3):312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tamazian A, Bhaskara Rao B (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145Google Scholar
  81. UNCTAD (2018) World investment Report—investment and new industrial policies. UNCTAD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  82. Wang JY, Blomström M (1992) Foreign investment and technology transfer: a simple model. Eur Econ Rev 36(1):137–155Google Scholar
  83. Xing Y, Kolstad C (2002) Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment? Environ Resour Econ 21:1–22Google Scholar
  84. Zhang YJ (2011) The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy 39:2197–2203Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Obafemi Awolowo UniversityIle-IfeNigeria
  2. 2.Lead EconomistAfrican Governance Development InstituteYaoundeCameroun

Personalised recommendations