Skip to main content
  • 830 Accesses

Abstract

Pathogenesis of shock and its treatment are considered. We warn against the excessive use of catecholamines (apart from septic shock).

The term itself, which indicates a blow aggression or intense disequilibrium of the entire organism, is considered by Rushmer and Coll. more “a semantic enigma” than a well-defined concept.

Col. Med. A. Amato, School of Military Medicine, Florence 1967

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Selye H. A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature. 1936;138(3479):32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blalock A. Mechanism and treatment of experimental shock, I: shock following hemorrhage. Arch Surg. 1927;15(5):762–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blalock A. Experimental shock: the cause of the low blood pressure produced by muscle injury. Arch Surg. 1930;20(6):959–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blalock A. The Alfred Blalock Papers: letter dated June 9, 1930. Located at: The Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives of the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blalock A. Shock: further studies with particular reference to the effects of hemorrhage. Arch Surg. 1934;29(5):837–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cannon WB. Traumatic shock. New York: D. Appleton & Co; 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cannon WB. Studies in experimental traumatic shock, IV: evidence of a toxic factor in wound shock. Arch Surg. 1922;4(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cannon WB. The Walter B. Cannon Papers: letter dated May 1, 1934. Located at: The Countway Library Rare Books and Special Collections of the Harvard Medical School, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cannon WB. The wisdom of the body, vol. 184. New York: W.W. Norton & Co; 1932. p. 864.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laborit H. Le vie antérieure. Paris: Grasset; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laborit H. L’Anesthesie facilitée par le synergies medicamentoses. Paris: Masson et Cie; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Laborit H, Huguenard P. L’hibernation artificielle par moyens pharmacodynamiques et physiques. Presse Med. 1951;59:1329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laborit H, Huguenard P, Allaume R. Un nouvou stabilisateur vegetatif : le 4560 RP (chloropromazine). Presse méd. 1952;60(10):206–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlon CA, Cavalloni L. Importanza dei riflessi neurovegetativi durante narcosi e nella genesi della malattia postoperatoria. Comunicato alla “Società Triveneta di Chirurgia” ed alla “Sez. Alta Italia della Soc. Ital. di Anestesiologia”, il 21/12/1952. Acta Anaesth. IV(1) Gennaio-Febbraio 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aiazzi Mancini M, Donatelli L. Trattato di farmacologia. Milano: Vallardi Editore; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ciocatto E. La Neuroleptoanalgesia. In: Ciocatto E, editor. Lezioni di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione. Cap. 7. Torino: Cortina Editore; 1977. p. 147–54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Castro G, Mundeleer P. Anesthésie sans sommeil: “Neuroleptoanalgesie”. Acta Chir Belg. 1959;58:689–93.

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Castro G, Mundeleer P. Anesthésie sans barbituriques. La neuroleptoanalgésie. Anesth Analg. 1959;16:1022.

    Google Scholar 

  19. De Castro G, Mundeleer P. Dehydrobenzoperidol et phentanyl: Due anesthésiques novoux qui appartent de nouvelle possibilities à la neuroleptonalgésie. In: Symposium sur la neuroleptoanalgésie dans le cadre du Congrès Europeen d’Anesthesiologie à Vienne le 5 septembre 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gasparetto A. Dalla rianimazione alle terapie intensive. In: Gasparetto A, Gritti G, editors. La rianimazione polivalente. Padova: Tipografia “La Garangola”. p. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Imperati L, D’Errico G, Ruggiero A. Ricerche sul trauma operatorio quale fattore di squasso: il potere colinesterasico del siero sullo squasso nervoso. G Ital Chir. 1946;2:493.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tonelli L, Pesce A. Le variazioni della colinesterasi serica nel decorso postoperatorio ed il loro significato nel problema patogenetico dello shock. Policlinico-Sez Chir. 1954;61:13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schachter RJ. Use of cholinestherase in shock. Am J Phys. 1945;143:552.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Amato A. Basi anatomiche ed elementi fisiopatogenetici e terapeutici degli stati di Shock. Supplemeto alla Sinossi di Traumatologia di Guerra e Chirurgia d’urgenza. Firenze: Scuola di Sanità Militare; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Novelli GP. Novelle vedute sulla etiopatogenesi dello shock. Acta Anaesthesiol. 1964;XV:625–74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shoemaker WC, Montgomery ES, Kapla E, Elwyn DH. Physiologic patterns in surviving and non surviving shock patients. Use of sequentials cardiorespiratory variables in defining criteria for therapeutics goals and early warning of death. Arch Surg. 1973;106:630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gasparetto A, Novelli GP. Aspetti bioumorali dello shock. Acta Anaesth Ital. 1979;30:943–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Candiani A, Corbucci GC, Montanari G, Crimi G, Gasparetto A. Sistemi mitocondriali e shock. Atti del simposio “Le nuove frontiere della rianimazione”. Roma 4–5 ottobre 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Candiani A. Aspetti emodinamici ed ossiforici dello shock (settico e cardiogeno). Min Anest. 1979;45:536.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Corbucci GC, Candiani A, Brancadoro D, Forastiere EMA, Gasparetto A. Antiossidanti e shock. Acta Anaes It. 1983;34(5):667–70.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vaschetto R, Navalesi P, Clemente N, et al. Osteopontin induces soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor production and release. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(2):157–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vaschetto R, Nicola S, et al. Serun levels of Osteopontin are increased in SIRS and sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:2186–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Laborit H. Les regulations metaboliques. Paris: Masson & Cie; 1965. p. 409.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lillehei RC, Longerbeam JK, Rosenberg JC. The nature of irreversible shock. In: Bock: shock pathogenesis and therapy. Berlin: Springer; 1962. p. 106–33.

    Google Scholar 

  35. De Backer D, Creteur J, Silva E, Vincent JL. Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: which is best? Crit Care Med. 2003;31(6):1659–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Levy B. Epinephrine in septic shock: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? Crit Care Med. 2003;31(6):1866–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. 41(2); February 2013. www.comjournal.org

  38. Freeman NE, et al. Effect of total sympathectomy on occurrence of shock from hemorrhage. J Clin Invest. 1938;17:359.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Levy EZ, North W, Wells JA. Modification of traumatic shock by adrenergic blocking agents. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1954;112:151–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ross CA, Herczeg S. Effect of ganglionic blocking agents on traumatic shock in rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1956;91:196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Overton RC, De Backey ME. Experimental observation on the influence of hypothermia and autonomic blocking agents on hemorrhagic shock. Ann Surg. 1956;143:439.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Lillehei RC, Mc Lean LD. Physiological approach to successful treatment of endotoxin shock in experimental animal. Arch Surg. 1957;78:464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nickerson M. Drug therapy of shock. In: Von Euler US, Bock KD, editors. Shock pathogenesis and therapy. An international symposium. Springer; 1962. p. 356–70.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Inglis FG, Hampson LG, Gurd FN. Effect of chloropromazine on survival time and mesenteric blood flow in experimental shock. Ann Surg. 1959;149(1):43–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Marzotti A, Alemanno F, Pierri A, Costa PP, Sammartano G. Valutazione di alcuni parametri bioumorali rilevati su sangue e linfa di animali sottoposti a shock sperimentale in condizioni diverse di anestesia. Acta Anaes Ital. 1976;27(2):199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ronco C, Brendolan A. E Coll. A pilot study of coupled plasma filtration with adsorption in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(6):1250–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Livigni S, Bertolini G et al. Efficacy of coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) in patients with septic shock: a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. Downloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on November 10, 2015—Published by group.bmj.

  48. Monti G, Terzi V, Calini A, et al. Rescue therapy with polymixin B hemoperfusion in high-dose vasopressor therapy refractory shock. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(5):516–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Donadello K, Taccone FS. Refractory septic shock: who and how should be purify? Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(5):475–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bendinelli M, Chezzi C, Fumarola D, Pitzurra M. Microbiologia Medica. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore; 1996. p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Aub JC. Toxic factor in experimental traumatic shock. New England J Med. 1944;231:71–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benison S, Barger AC, Wolfe EL. Walter B. Cannon and the mystery of shock: a study of Anglo-American co-operation in world war I. Med Hist. 1991;35(2):216–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buchman TG. Blalock and Cannon. Arch Surg. 2010;145(4):393–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers NK, Buchman TG. Shock at the millennium. In Walter B. Cannon and Alfred Blalock. Shock. 2000;13(6):497–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudry IH, Wichterman KA, Baue AE. Effect of sepsis on tissue adenine nucleotide levels. Surgery. 1979;85:205–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes OD, Santacruz C, Donadello K, Nobile L, Taccone FS. Colloids for fluid resuscitation: what is the role in patients with shock? Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80(8):963–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton ML. Blalock and Harrison—a rare friendship. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 1998;61(3):26–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eger W. Allgemeinreaktionen des Organismus und Organverȁnderungen durch die Plasmaexpander Periston, Macrodex, Haemaccel, Physiogel und Plasmagel. In: Horatz K, et al., editors. Shock un Plasmaexpander. Springer Verlag OHG. Berlin. Heidelberg: Gȍttingen; 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Barrebo P, Belibrea JL. Metabolic response in shock. Surg Gyn Obst. 1978;146:182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasparetto A, Gritti G. La rianimazione polivalente. Padua: La Garangola; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzani A, Polati E, Danese S. Colloidi sintetici. In: Gullo A. Medicina perioperatoria Terapia intensiva Emergenza. Springer-Verlag Italia, Milan; 2003. p. 137–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montanari G, Corbucci GG, Gasparetto A. Cellula e shock. Minerva Anestesiol. 1979;45:519.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagler AL, Levenson SM. The nature of the toxic material in the blood of rats subjected to irreversible hemorrhagic shock. Circ Shock. 1974;1:251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen VG. Old mineshaft, new canary: can circulating osteopontin concentrations predict septic shock? Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(2):116–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rushmer RF Van Citters RL, Franklin DL. Shock: semantic enigma. Circulation. 1962;26:445–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saleta JL, Nieto JAS, et al. Nosocomial outbreaks caused by leuconostoc mesenteroides. Emerg Infect Dis J. 2008;14(6). http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/6/07-0581

  • Shorr E, Zweifach BW. Furchgott. On the occurrence, sites and modes of origin and destruction, of priciples affecting the compensatory vascular mechanism in experimental shock. Science. 1945;102:489–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen W, Thomas O. Transcript of discussion at the meeting. Trans Am Surg Assoc. 1934;52:123–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bosco, M., Alemanno, F. (2020). Shock. In: Alemanno, F. (eds) Biochemistry for Anesthesiologists and Intensivists. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26721-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26721-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26720-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26721-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics