Skip to main content

Understanding the Alignment of Employee Appraisals and Rewards with Business Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management (BPM 2019)

Abstract

A successful implementation and adoption of Business Process Management (BPM) requires an alignment with other management areas in an organization, and specifically with practices related to Human Resource Management (HRM). While the BPM literature highlights the importance of aligning HRM appraisals and rewards to business processes, little is known about how organizations actually align these two areas in practice, and how they face the challenges of this alignment. For this purpose, we conducted ten explorative case studies to acquire empirical evidence and gain better insights on this issue. We uncovered four patterns of BPM-HRM alignment and determined their important components. This work discusses the critical factors that are important for a successful BPM-HRM alignment and provides recommendations for this alignment by differentiating between lower and higher levels of BPM maturity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agarwal, N.C.: Reward systems: emerging trends and issues. Can. Psychol. 39, 60–70 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nadarajah, D., Syed, A., Kadir, S.L.: Measuring business process management using business process orientation and process improvement initiatives. Bus. Process Manag. J. 22, 1069–1078 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M.: Handbook on Business Process Management 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Zairi, M., Jarrar, Y.F., Aspinwall, E., Practices, B.: A reward, recognition, and appraisal system for future competitiveness: a UK survey of best practices, pp. 1–19 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fletcher, C.: Performance appraisal and management: the developing research agenda. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 74, 473–487 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong, M.: A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aguinis, H.: Performance Management. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Noe, R., Hollenbeck, J., Gerhart, B., Wright, P.: Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. McGraw-Hill, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boswell, W.R., Boudreau, J.W.: Employee line of sight to the organization’s strategic objectives – what it is, how it can be enhanced, and what it makes happen. In: CAHRS Working Paper Series, p. 69 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Armstrong, M.: Reward Management Practice: Improving Performance Through Reward. Kogan Page, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herzberg, F.: Pinpointing what ails the organization. J. Appl. Psychol. 55, 73–789 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan, R., Deci, E.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Latham, G., Locke, E.: Goal-setting: a motivational technique that works. Organ. Dyn. 8, 68–80 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawler, E.E.: Creating a new employment deal: total rewards and the new workforce. Organ. Dyn. 40, 302–309 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delery, J.E., Doty, D.: Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: test of universalistic, contingency and configurational performance predictions. Acad. Manag. J. 39, 802–835 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wood, S.: Human resource management and performance. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 1, 367–413 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Towards a business process management maturity model. In: Bartmann, D., Rajola, F., Kallinikos, J., Avison, D., Winter, R., Ein-Dor, P., et al. (eds.) ECIS 2005 Proceedings of the Thirteenth European Conference on Information Systems, Germany, 26–28 May 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Willaert, P., Van den Bergh, J., Willems, J., Deschoolmeester, D.: The process-oriented organization: a holistic view. Data Knowl. Eng. 64, 1–2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kohlbacher, M.: The effects of process orientation: a literature review. Bus. Process Manag. J. 16, 135–152 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M.: Handbook on Business Process Management 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45103-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Hammer, M.: The process audit. Harv. Bus Rev. 85(4), 111–123 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kohlbacher, M., Gruenwald, S.: Process orientation: conceptualization and measurement. Bus. Process Manag, J. 17, 267–283 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hammer, M., Stanton, S.: How process enterprises really work. Harv. Bus Rev. 77(6), 108–118 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., Poels, G.: A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 8, 188–224 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmiedel, T., vom Brocke, J., Recker, J.: Which cultural values matter to business process management? Bus. Process Manag. J. 19, 292–317 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Babic-Hodovic, V., Arslangic-Kalajdzic, M.: The influence of quality practices on BH companies’ business performance. J. Manag. Cases Spec. Issue 14(1), 305–307 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Müller, O., Schmiedel, T., Gorbacheva, E., vom Brocke, J.: Towards a typology of business process management professionals: identifying patterns of competences through latent semantic analysis. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 10, 50–80 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kratzer, S., Lohmann, P., Roeglinger, M., Rupprecht, L., zur Muehlen, M.: The role of the chief process officer in organizations. Bus. Process Manag. J. 25, 688–706 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Danilova, K.B.: Process owners in business process management: a systematic literature review. Bus. Process Manag. J. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leyer, M., Wollersheim, J.: How to learn process-oriented thinking: an experimental investigation of the effectiveness of different learning modes. Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. 65, 454–474 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Waldman, D.A.: Designing performance management systems for total quality implementation. J. Organ. Change Manag. 7, 31–44 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Harmon, P.: Business Process Change. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rummler, G., Brache, A.: Improving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Orgnization Chart. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. OMG: Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. SEI: CMMI for Services, Version 1.3 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rohloff, M.: An approach to assess the implementation of business process management in enterprises

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fisher, D.M.: The business process maturity model a practical approach for identifying opportunities for optimization, pp. 1–7 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Harmon, P.: Evaluating an organization’s business process maturity executive (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Myers, M., Avison, D.: An introduction to qualitative research in information systems. Qual. Res. Inf. Syst. 326, 3–13 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publishing, Los Angeles (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Recker, J.: Scientific research in information systems: a beginner’s guide (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. McCormack, K.P.: Business process orientation: do you have it? Qual. Prog. 34, 51–58 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aygun Shafagatova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shafagatova, A., Van Looy, A. (2019). Understanding the Alignment of Employee Appraisals and Rewards with Business Processes. In: Hildebrandt, T., van Dongen, B., Röglinger, M., Mendling, J. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11675. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26619-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26618-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26619-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics