Abstract
Hegel claims that poetry, not prose, is the most original form of writing. This chapter examines why Hegel’s account of the history of the arts puts such emphasis on poetry—and on the apparent philosophical relevance he accorded the distinction between poetry and prose. It offers in so doing an introduction to some of the larger philosophical questions raised by Hegel’s aesthetics. In particular, it addresses (1) the question of the origin of art as an interpretive human activity—how it is created and distinguishes itself from the seemingly natural or prosaic world; (2) the question of art’s relation to consciousness and why prose needs to be considered not merely as a stylistic literary mode; and (3) the question of Hegel’s familiar historical account of the development of the specific art-forms of the symbolic, classical and romantic within the context of his famous claims about the supposed “end” of art. In considering these questions, the article examines several contemporary stances toward the historicity of Hegel’s philosophy of art. Although this question of art’s end and the post-romantic is most often considered from the perspective of the visual arts—particularly Danto’s well-known claims about abstract painting in the post-Warhol era—an examination of Hegel’s views about literature and prose narrative is important to consider in this context. The article compares Hegel’s views on prose narrative with Russian Formalist and Bakhtinian perspectives, arguing that what we notice in a work of literary art is that it has a kind of totality or independence that makes it complete within itself. On Hegel’s view, it’s not that poetry removes or distorts prosaic life, but that it actually draws a kind of intense life into itself. The article also opens the space for an examination of Hegel’s own use of prose narrative in various philosophical contexts as a mode of inquiry, from the unique form of the Phenomenology of Spirit to the distinctively narrative tasks within the Aesthetics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Fried, Michael. 1990. Courbet’s Realism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gibson, John. 2007. Fiction and the Weave of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hammermeister, Kai. 2002. The German Aesthetic Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henrich, Dieter. 1979. “Art and Philosophy of Art Today: Reflections with Reference to Hegel.” Translated by David Henry Wilson et. al. In New Perspectives in German Literary Criticism: A Collection of Essays, edited by Richard E. Amacher and Victor Lange, 107–133. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1992. “Fragments of a Treatise on the Ode.” In Johann Gottlieb Herder: Selected Early Works 1764–1767. Translated by Ernest A. Menze and Michael Palma. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Houlgate, Stephen. 2013. “Hegel, Danto and the ‘End of Art.’” In The Impact of Idealism: The Legacy of Post-Kantian German Thought, edited by Nicholas Boyle et. al., 264–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kivy, Peter. 2012. “What Really Happened in the Eighteenth Century: The ‘Modern System’ Re-examined (Again).” British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1): 61–74.
Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 1951–1952. “The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 12 (4) (October 1951): 496–527, and 13 (1) (January 1952): 17–46.
Morson, Gary Saul and Caryl Emerson. 1990. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Pippin, Robert. 2005. The Persistence of Subjectivity: On the Kantian Aftermath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, Robert. 2015. After the Beautiful: Hegel and the Philosophy of Pictorial Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Porter, James I. 2010. The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Royce, Josiah. 1919. Lectures on Modern Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rutter, Benjamin. 2010. Hegel on the Modern Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Speight, Allen. 2001. Hegel, Literature and the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Speight, Allen. 2011. “Hegel and the ‘Historical Deduction’ of the Concept of Art.” In Blackwell Companion to Hegel, edited by Stephen Houlgate and Michael Baur, 353–368. Oxford: Blackwell.
Speight, Allen. 2013. “Artisans, Artists and Hegel’s History of the Philosophy of Art.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 34 (2): 203–222.
Speight, Allen. 2016. “Philosophy and Literature in the Nineteenth Century.” In The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Literature, edited by Noel Carroll and John Gibson, 30–39. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Speight, A. (2020). Hegel on Poetry, Prose and the Origin of the Arts. In: Bykova, M.F., Westphal, K.R. (eds) The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26596-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26597-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)