Advertisement

Causality, Natural Systems, and Hegel’s Organicism

Chapter
  • 246 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism book series (PHGI)

Abstract

Hegel’s holism or ‘organicism’ pertains to biology and to philosophy of biology, but how and why so remain obscure until basic features of Hegel’s epistemology and philosophy of nature are properly identified and integrated. These basic features Hegel identified and justified through his internal critique of Kant’s Critical philosophy, his consequent rejection of the late Mediaeval, deductivist ‘top-down’ model of a proper science (scientia) and his further development of conceptual explication to clarify, differentiate and also integrate concepts and principles fundamental (inter alia) to the natural sciences, so as to identify those conditions necessary and sufficient for any distinctive kind of natural phenomenon, and how those conditions are necessary to though insufficient for more complex kinds of natural phenomena. The specific constituents and their systematic structure and functioning (behavior) within any natural system must be identified and explained by empirical sciences. Hegel’s philosophical contribution is to show (inter alia) why and how the required concepts and principles are integrated and instantiated in ways which suffice for knowledge, understanding and explanation of natural phenomena, whilst foreclosing on conventionalism, scepticism or unwarranted transcendent metaphysical speculations. Hegel’s examination of causality and causal explanation highlight the centrality of causal processes, which involve causal powers, causal structures and causal activities, in ways congenial to organicism, to systems biology and to causal mechanisms within biological explanation.

Keywords

Causal realism Causal process Causal law Causal structure Reduction Emergence Behavior of complex systems Organicism Non-reductive naturalism Biology Teleology Functionalism Forces of nature Cognitive reference Systems biology Newton Kant Galileo 

Bibliography

  1. Anon. 1786. Review of Kant, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. Göttingische Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen 191 (2 Dec. 1786):1914–1918. Reprinted in Kant Ak. 21:415.2–17; cf. 22:809.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, Jonathan. 1997. Logic and the Imperial Stoa. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bliss, Ricki, and Kelly Trogdon. 2016. “Metaphysical Grounding.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/grounding/.
  4. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2015. “Deixis.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed., vol. 6, edited by J. Wright (editor-in-chief), 52–57. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Boogerd, Fred, Frank Bruggemann, Jan-Hendrik Hofmeyer, and H. V. Westerhof, eds. 2007. Systems Biology: Philosophical Foundations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Boulter, Stephen. 2011. “The Origin of Conceivability Arguments.” Metaphilosophy 42 (5): 617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breidbach, Olaf, and Dietrich von Engelhardt, eds. 2002. Hegel und die Lebenswissenschaften. Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.Google Scholar
  8. Brook, Andrew. 1994. Kant and the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brook, Andrew. 2016. “Kant’s View of the Mind and Consciousness of Self.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/kant-mind/.
  10. Burbidge, John. 1996. Real Process: How Logic and Chemistry Combine in Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burbidge, John. 2004. “Hegel’s Logic.” In Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 3, edited by D. M. Gabbay and J. Woods, 131–175. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Chiereghin, Franco. 2009. “Freedom and Thought: Stoicism, Skepticism, and Unhappy Consciousness.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by K. R. Westphal, 55–71. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins, Ardis. 1990. “Contradiction and Relations: Hegel and the Tradition.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64 (4): 509–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, Ardis. 2013. Hegel’s Phenomenology: The Dialectical Justification of Philosophy’s First Principles. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Craver, Carl, and James Tabery. 2017. “Mechanisms in Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/science-mechanisms/.
  16. Davidson, Donald. 1987. “‘Afterthoughts’ to ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.’” In idem. (2001), 154–157.Google Scholar
  17. Davidson, Donald. 2001. Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Vries, Willem. 1988. Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (Now available in PDF format from the author’s web site).Google Scholar
  19. de Vries, Willem. 1991. “The Dialectic of Teleology.” Philosophical Topics 19 (2): 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. di Giovanni, George. 2009. “Religion, History, and Spirit in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by K. R. Westphal, 226–245. London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrini, Cinzia. 1988. “On the Relation Between ‘Mode’ and ‘Measure’ in Hegel’s Science of Logic: Some Introductory Remarks.” The Owl of Minerva 20 (1): 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrini, Cinzia. 1991/1992. “Logica e filosofia della natura nella Dottrina dell’essere hegeliana,” Parts 1, 2, Rivista di storia della filosofia, new series; Part 1, 46 (4) (1991): 701–735; Part 2, 47 (1) (1992): 103–124.Google Scholar
  23. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2004. “Heavenly Bodies, Crystals and Organisms: The Key-Role of Chemical Affinity in Kant’s Critical Cosmogony.” In Eredità kantiane (1804–2004). Questioni aperte e problemi irrisolti, edited by C. Ferrini, 277–317. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
  24. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2007. “On Hegel’s Confrontation with the Sciences in “Observing Reason”: Notes for a Discussion.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 55/56: 1–22.Google Scholar
  25. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2009a. “The Challenge of Reason: From Certainty to Truth.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by K. R. Westphal, 73–91. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2009b. “Reason Observing Nature.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by K. R. Westphal, 92–135. Blackwell: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2009c. “From Geological to Animal Nature in Hegel’s Idea of Life.” Hegel-Studien 44: 45–93.Google Scholar
  28. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2010. “From the Physical World to the Habitat: Biocentrism in Hegel’s Interrelation of Animal Subjectivity with Its Environment.” In Hegels Naturphilosophie in der Dritten Moderne. Bestimmungen, Probleme und Perspektiven, edited by O. Breidbach and W. Neuser (Ernst-Haeckel-Haus-Studien. Monographien zur Geschichte der Biowissenschaften und Medizin 13, 119–135). Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.Google Scholar
  29. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2011. “The Transition to Organics: Hegel’s Idea of Life.” In The Blackwell Companion to Hegel, edited by S. Houlgate and M. Baur, 203–224. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2012. “Hegel on Nature and Spirit: Some Systematic Remarks.” Hegel-Studien 46: 117–150.Google Scholar
  31. Ferrini, Cinzia. 2020. “Hegel’s Revisions of the Logic of Being: A Controversial Issue.” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 1.2.Google Scholar
  32. Fulda, Hans-Friedrich. 1975. Das Problem einer Einleitung in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main, Klostermann.Google Scholar
  33. Gettier, Edmund. 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23 (6): 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glennan, Stuart. 2002. “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 69 (S3): S342–S353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glennan, Stuart. 2010. “Mechanisms, Causes, and the Layered Model of the World.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (2): s362–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanna, Robert. 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hare, R. M. 1960. “Philosophical Discoveries.” Mind 69 (274): 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harris, Henry S. 1997. Hegel’s Ladder. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Houlgate, Stephen. 2005. An Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth and History. 2nd rev. ed. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Huneman, Philippe, ed. 2013. Functions: Selection and Mechanisms. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Kim, Jagewon, 1999. “Making Sense of Emergence.” Philosophical Studies 95: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LaPlace, Pierre Simon de. 1796. L’exposition du système du monde. 2 vols. Paris, Cercle-Social; 6th rev. ed.: Bruxelles: H. Remy, 1829; Paris: Bachelier, 1836; reprinted in idem. Œuvres de LaPlace (Paris: Impr. Royale, 1846), vol. 6.Google Scholar
  43. Lenz, Johann Georg, ed. 1804. Schriften der Herzoglichen Societät für die gesammte Mineralogie zu Jena. Jena: Göpferdt.Google Scholar
  44. Lodish, Harvey, Arnold Berk, Chris Kaiser, Monty Krieger, Anthony Bretscher, Hidde Ploegh, Angelika Amon, and Matthew Scott. 2013. Molecular Cell Biology. 7th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
  45. Mates, Benson. 1961. Stoic Logic. 2nd rev. ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. McKeon, Richard. 1994. On Knowing: The Natural Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Melnick, Arthur. 1989. Space, Time and Thought in Kant. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moretto, Antonio. 2004. Filosofia della Matematica e della Meccanica del sistema Hegeliano. 2nd rev. ed. Padova: Il Poligrafo.Google Scholar
  49. Nasti de Vincentis, Mauro. 2018. “‘Chrysippus’ Counterargument Against the Master Argument: A Reappraisal.” SATSNorthern European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2): 139–159.Google Scholar
  50. Nicholson, Daniel. 2014. “The Return of the Organism as a Fundamental Explanatory Concept in Biology.” Philosophy Compass 9 (5): 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nicholson, Daniel, and Richard Gawne. 2015. “Neither Logical Empiricism nor Vitalism, but Organicism: What the Philosophy of Biology Was.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37 (4): 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nobel, Denis. 2008. The Music of Life: Biology Beyond Genes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Nobel, Denis. 2016. Dance to the Tune of Life: Biological Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. O’Connor, Timothy, and Hong Yu Wong. 2015. “Emergent Properties.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited in E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/properties-emergent/.
  55. Piché, David. 1999. La condamnation parisienne de 1277. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  56. Renault, Emmanuel. 2002. Philosophie chimique. Hegel et la science dynamiste de son temps. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
  57. Richards, Robert. 2010. The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rorty, Richard. 1986. “Pragmatism, Davidson and Truth.” In Truth and Interpretation, edited by E. Lepore, 333–355. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Schulze, G. E. [Anon. 1803]. 2020. “Aphorisms on the Absolute.” Translated by K. R. Westphal, James Sares, and Caleb Faul. The Owl of Minerva 51 (at press).Google Scholar
  60. Stekeler-Weithofer, Pirmin. 1992. Hegels Analytische Philosophie. Die Wissenschaft der Logik als kritische Theorie der Bedeutung. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
  61. Stewart, Jon, ed. 1996. The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Snow, C. P. 1964. The Two Cultures, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Tennemann, Wilhelm Gottlieb. 1811. Geschichte der Philosophie, achter Band, zweite Hälfte. Leipzig: J.A. Barth.Google Scholar
  64. von Engelhardt, Dietrich. 1976. Hegel und die Chemie. Studie zur Philosophie und Wissenschaft der Natur um 1800. Wiesbaden: Guido Pressler.Google Scholar
  65. von Engelhardt, Dietrich. 1984. “The Chemical System of Substances, Forces and Processes in Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature and in the Sciences of the Time.” In Hegel and the Sciences, edited by R. S. Cohen and M. Wartofsky, 41–54. Dordrecht: Riedel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. von Pfleiderer, Christoph Friedrich. 1804. Physik. Naturlehre nach Klügel. Nachschrift einer Tübinger Vorlesung von 1804, edited by P. Ziche. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1994.Google Scholar
  67. Westphal, Kenneth R. 1989. Hegel’s Epistemological Realism: A Study of the Aim and Method of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Westphal, Kenneth R. 1991. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Moral World View.” Philosophical Topics 19 (2): 133–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Westphal, Kenneth R. 1998. Hegel, Hume und die Identität wahrnehmbarer Dinge. Historisch-kritische Analyse zum Kapitel „Wahrnehmung“ in der Phänomenologie von 1807. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  70. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2002. “Hegel’s Internal Critique of Naïve Realism.” Journal of Philosophical Research 25: 173–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2002/2003. “Analytischer Gehalt und zeitgenössische Bedeutung von Hegels Kritik des unmittelbaren Wissens.” Jahrbuch für Hegel-Forschungen 8/9: 129–143.Google Scholar
  72. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007. “Consciousness and Its Transcendental Conditions: Kant’s Anti-Cartesian Revolt.” In Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy, edited by S. Heinämaa, V. Lähteenmäki, and P. Remes, 223–243. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  74. Westphal, Kenneth R., ed. 2009a. The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  75. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009b. “Hegel’s Phenomenological Method & Analysis of Consciousness.” In The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, edited by K. R. Westphal, 1–36. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2015a. “Causal Realism & the Limits of Empiricism: Some Unexpected Insights from Hegel.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (2): 281–317.Google Scholar
  77. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2015b. “Conventionalism & the Impoverishment of the Space of Reasons: Carnap, Quine.” Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 3 (8): 1–66.Google Scholar
  78. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2016. “Mind, Language & Behaviour: Kant’s Critical Cautions contra Contemporary Internalism & Causal Naturalism.” In Felsefede Yöntem/Method in Philosophy, special issue of Yeditepe’de Felsefe/Philosophy at Yeditepe 10, edited by S. Babür, 102–149. İstanbul: Yeditepe Üniversitesi Press.Google Scholar
  79. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2018. Grounds of Pragmatic Realism: Hegel’s Internal Critique & Transformation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Leiden: Brill (series: Critical Studies in German Idealism, edited by Paul Cobben).Google Scholar
  80. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2019. “Hegel’s Critique of Theoretical Spirit: Kant’s Functionalist Cognitive Psychology in Context.” In Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit: A Critical Guide, edited by M. F. Bykova, 57–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Westphal, Kenneth R. 2020. “Kant’s Analytic of Principle.” In Kant, edited by M. Timmons & S. Baiasu, Chapter 8. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Whewell, William. 1847. The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon Their History. 2 vols., 2nd rev. ed. London: J.W. Parker.Google Scholar
  83. Wimsatt, William. 2007. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Wimsatt, William. 2013. “Evolution and the Stability of Functional Architecture.” In Functions: Selection and Mechanisms, edited by P. Huneman, 19–41. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wolff, Michael. 1986. “Hegel und Cauchy. Eine Untersuchung zur Philosophie und Geschichte der Mathematik.” In Hegel und die Naturwissenschaften, edited by R.-P. Horstmann, 197–263. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  86. Wolff, Michael. 1989. „Realitätsstufen oder Entwicklung? Hegels ,Realphilosophie‘ und die Philosophie der Wissenschaften.” Hegel-Jahrbuch: 397–415.Google Scholar
  87. Wolff, Michael. 2009. Abhandlungen über die Prinzipien der Logik. 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  88. Wolff, Michael. 2017. “How Precise is Kant’s Table of Judgments?” Translated by K. R. Westphal. In Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide, edited by J. O’Shea, 83–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Wolff, Michael. 2020. “Levels of Reality or Development? Hegel’s “Realphilosophie” and Philosophy of the Sciences.” Translated by K. R. Westphal. In The Palgrave Hegel Handbook, edited by M. F. Bykova and K. R. Westphal, 201–217. London: Palgrave; translation of Wolff (1989).Google Scholar
  90. Ziche, Paul. 2000. “Die Jenaer Naturforschende Gesellschaft und ihre Bedeutung für die Naturforschung in Jena.” In Gelehrte Gesellschaften im mitteldeutschen Raum (1650–1820), edited by D. Döring and K. Nowak, 107–131. Leipzig: Verlag der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig.Google Scholar
  91. Ziemke, Axel. 1992. System und Subjekt. Biosystemforschung und radikaler Konstruktivismus im Lichte der hegelschen Logik. Wiesbaden: Vieweg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBoğaziçi ÜniversitesiIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations