Advertisement

Making Rental Housing in the Gap-Market More Affordable Through Green Building Technology

  • Prisca Simbanegavi
  • Ziev ShaniEmail author
  • Justin Watkins
  • Kimera Ramruthan
Conference paper

Abstract

There exists a phenomenon whereby “affordable housing” developed by the private sector has become unaffordable. The advancements of the 4th Industrial Revolution, namely Green Building Technology (GBT), provides a possible solution to making rental housing in the gap market more affordable by reducing the tenant’s utility bills. The paper uses a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to determine: Various GBT’s that can be used; if the Green Building (GB) tenant benefits financially; benefits and barriers for the developer. The findings showed that the incorporation of GBTs can indeed reduce the tenants housing expenditure. The paper makes a strong case for the private sector to build green affordable housing and has found many benefits that enhance the feasibility of such development. These include: increased property value; lower tenant turnover; tax benefits; reduced operating costs among others. The development of Green Buildings should become standard practice as we enter the 4th Industrial Revolution.

Keywords

Green Building Gap-Market Rental Poverty 

References

  1. 1.
    Newton, C., Schuermans, N.: More than twenty years after the repeal of the group areas act: housing, spatial planning and urban development in post-apartheid South Africa. J. Hous. Built Environ. 28(4), 579–587 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CAHF.: Understanding the challenges in South Africa’s Gap Housing Market and opportunities for the RDP resale market. Centre of Affordable Housing Finance in Africa, Johannesburg (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersen, N.: Wait for homes: Gauteng housing unit backlog now at over a million (2018). https://www.thesouthafrican.com/wait-for-homes-gauteng-housing-unit-backlog-now-at-over-a-million/
  4. 4.
    Muhoro, G.N.: Towards innovative approaches for affordable housing in the gap market: a case study of Khayelitsha Township in Cape Town, South Africa. Ph. D. University of Cape Town (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dugard, J., Clark, M., Tissington, K., Wilson, S.: The Right to housing in South Africa. Foundation for Human Rights, Johannesburg (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tipple, G.: Housing policy-making in Africa: ten common assumptions. Habitat Int. 49, 413–418 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gauteng Partnership Fund.: Green Building Guideline Medium Density Affordable Housing. Johannesburg: WSP Contacts, pp. 1–30 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newton, D.: Public-Private Cooperation crucial to solving SA housing crisis. Old Mutual, Johannesburg (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tissington, K.: Minding the Gap: An Analysis of the Supply of and Demand for Low-Income Rental Accommodation in Inner-City Johannesburg. Socio-Economic Rights Insti-tute, Johannesburg (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ham-Baloyi, W.T., Jordan, P.: Systematic review as a research method in postgraduate nursing education. ScienceDirect Health SA Gesondheid 21, 120–128 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCabe, A., Pojani, D., van Groenou, A.B.: The application of renewable energy to social housing: a systematic review. Energy policy 114, 549–557 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xiao, Y., Watson, M.: Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 39, 1–20 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bradshaw, W., Connelly, E.F., Cook, M.F., Goldstein, J., Pauly, J.: The costs and benefits of green affordable housing. New Ecology and The Green CDCs Initiative, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mutwiri, G.E.: An Analysis of Benefits of Green Buildings. Undergraduate. University of Nairobi (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shazmin, S., Sipan, I., Sapri, M.: Property tax assessment incentives for green building: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60, 536–548 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wallbaum, H., Ostermeyer, Y., Salzer, C., Zea Escamilla, E.: Indicator based sustainability assessment tool for affordable housing construction technologies. Ecol. Ind. 18, 353–364 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahmad, S.F.: Techniques for improving lives by green low-income housing. In: International Conference on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Al-Ali, S.Z.: Analysis of Project Costs for Green Buildings in the UAE–A Case Study. The British University in Dubai (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan, C., Ma, T.: Energy efficiency housing in South Australia – a gap analysis between the expected and actual benefits. Procedia Eng. 164, 446–452 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geng, L.: The application of information and incentives as tools to promote green affordable housing development. Ph.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hands, E.V.: Housing can be both green and affordable|Innovative projects demonstrate how. Master’s. The University of Montana (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manoj, P.K.: Research paper economics prospects and challenges of green buildings and green affordable homes-concept: a study with reference to Ernakulam, Kerala. Economics 2(12), 45–49 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ross, N., Bowen, P., Lincoln, D.: Sustainable housing for low-income communities: lessons for South Africa in local and other developing world cases. Constr. Manage. Econ. 28(5), 433–449 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Copiello, S.: Achieving affordable housing through energy efficiency strategy. Energy Policy 85, 288–298 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, L., Wu, J., Liu, H.: Turning green into gold: a review on the economics of green buildings. J. Cleaner Prod. 172, 2234–2245 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Environmental Protection Agency: Energy Efficiency in Affordable Housing. Local government climate and energy strategy series (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dwaikat, L.N., Ali, K.N.: Green buildings cost premium: a review of empirical evidence. Energy Build. 110, 396–403 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams, B.E.: Overcoming barriers to energy efficiency for rental housing. Master’s. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ambrose, A.R.: Improving energy efficiency in private rented housing: why don’t landlords act? Indoor Built Environ. 24(7), 913–924 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bird, S., Hernández, D.: Policy options for the split incentive: increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters. Energy Policy 48, 506–514 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Charlier, D.: Energy efficiency investments in the context of split incentives among French households. Energy Policy 87, 465–479 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Olubunmi, O., Xia, P., Skitmore, M.: Green building incentives: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 59, 1611–1621 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hwang, B.-G., Zhu, L., Wang, Y., Cheong, X.: Green building construction projects in singapore: cost premiums and cost performance. Proj. Manage. J. 48(4), 67–79 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P., Holtermans, R.: Energy efficiency and economic value in affordable housing. Energy Policy 97, 39–49 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Emekci, Ş., Tanyer, A.M.: New Perspective on More Sustainable and Affordable Housing for Lower Income Group in Turkey-Assessing Life Cycle Cost. Green Lines Institute for Sustainable Development, Turkey, pp. 555–564 (2016)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zuo, J., Zhao, Z.-Y.: Green building research-current status and future agenda: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30, 271–281 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dolata, R.D.: Addressing the barriers to sustainable design in the process of developing multifamily affordable housing in Minnesota. Master’s. University of Minnesota (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nedbank: Nedbank Funding makes green affordable housing a reality. Nedbank (2017)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
    Tucker, C.: Energy efficiency initiatives in South Africa, Bowmans (2017). https://www.bowmanslaw.com/insights/environmental-law/energy-efficiently-initiatives-south-africa/
  41. 41.
    Chen, M., Chen, J.G., Cheng, X.X.: Life cycle incremental cost-benefit analysis of green building. Appl. Mech. Mater. 71–78, 4645–4651 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sentman, S., Del Percio, S., Koerner, P.: A climate for change: green building policies, programs, and incentives. J. Green Build. 3(2), 46–63 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prisca Simbanegavi
    • 1
  • Ziev Shani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Justin Watkins
    • 1
  • Kimera Ramruthan
    • 1
  1. 1.Construction and Economics ManagementUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations