A Model of Network Communication in Building Information Modelling Supply Chain

  • Oluseye OlugboyegaEmail author
  • Abimbola Windapo
Conference paper


The exact nature of communication among the BIM supply chain members and the significant influence of BIM process requirements on the nature of communication among the BIM supply chain members is yet to be understood. This study explores the influences of BIM process requirements on the nature of the communication process among the BIM supply chain members. The study employed a Meta-Analysis methodology for interpreting the concepts of network communication in BIM supply chain, and for developing the conceptual model. Results indicated that the two dimensions of network communication (mixed communication and structured communication) showed consistent relations with network communication. The findings provide empirical insights into the nature of network communication and highlight the importance of communication channels, communication protocols and platforms, and structured e-meeting in BIM supply chain within collaborative working processes among the supply chain stakeholders.


BIM BIM supply chain Communication in BIM Network Communication Mixed Communication Structured Communication Communication theory 



The financial assistance of the University of Cape Town (UCT), TETFUND and the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. The opinions expressed, and conclusions arrived at, are those of the authors and are not necessarily to be attributed to UCT, TETFUND or NRF.


  1. 1.
    Al Hattab, M., Hamzeh, F.: Information flow comparison between traditional and BIM-based projects in the design phase. In: Proceedings for the 21st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, pp. 761–770 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anumba, C.J., Evbuomwan, N.F.O.: A taxonomy for communication facets in concurrent life-cycle design and construction. Comput. Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 14(1), 37–44 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baiden, B.K., Price, A.D.F.: The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 29(2), 129–136 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barlish, K., Sullivan, K.: How to measure the benefits of BIM—a case study approach. Autom. Construct. 24, 149–159 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bassanino, M., Fernando, T., Wu, K.-C.: Can virtual workspaces enhance team communication and collaboration in design review meetings? Architectural Eng. Des. Manage. 10(3–4), 200–217 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bechtel, C., Jayaram, J.: Supply chain management: a strategic perspective. Int. J. Logistics Manage. 8(1), 15–34 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buvik, M.P., Rolfsen, M.: Prior ties and trust development in project teams–a case study from the construction industry. Int. J. Project Manage. 33(7), 1484–1494 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Charalambous, G., Thorpe, T., Demian, P., Yeomans, S.G., Doughty, N., Peters, C.: Collaborative BIM in the Cloud and the Communication tools to support it (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, E.W.L., Li, H., Love, P.E.D., Irani, Z.: Network communication in the construction industry. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 6(2), 61–70 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Blois, M., Herazo-Cueto, B., Latunova, I., Lizarralde, G.: Relationships between construction clients and participants of the building industry: structures and mechanisms of coordination and communication. Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 7(1), 3–22 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dike, I.U., Kapogiannis, G.: A conceptual model for improving construction supply chain performance. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference (ARCOM 2014), Portsmouth, UK (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dubas, S., Pasławski, J.: The concept of improving communication in BIM during transfer to operation phase on the Polish market. Procedia Eng. 208, 14–19 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erik Eriksson, P.: Improving construction supply chain collaboration and performance: a lean construction pilot project. Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 15(5), 394–403 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fiala, P.: Information sharing in supply chains. Omega 33(5), 419–423 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fox, S., Leicht, R.M., Messner, J.I.: Assessing the relevance of media synchronicity theory to the use of communication media in the AECO industry. J. Archit. Eng. 16(2), 54–62 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Getuli, V., Ventura, S.M., Capone, P., Ciribini, A.L.C.: A BIM-based construction supply chain framework for monitoring progress and coordination of site activities. Procedia Eng. 164, 542–549 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goh, K., Goh, H., Toh, S., Peniel Ang, S.: Enhancing communication in the construction industry through BIM. In: 11th International Conference on Innovation and Management, pp. 313–324 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L.: Dichotomization of continuous variables: the implications for meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 75(3), 334 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee, J., Bernold, L.E.: Ubiquitous agent-based communication in construction. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 22(1), 31–39 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leung, S., Mak, S., Lee, B.L.P.: Using a real-time integrated communication system to monitor the progress and quality of construction works. Automation Constr. 17(6), 749–757 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meng, X.: The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction. Int. J. Project Manage. 30(2), 188–198 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Min, J.U., Bjornsson, H.C.: Agent-based construction supply chain simulator (CS 2) for measuring the value of real-time information sharing in construction. J. Manage. Eng. 24(4), 245–254 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nawi, M.N.M., Haron, A.T., Hamid, Z.A., Kamar, K.A.M., Baharuddin, Y.: Improving integrated practice through Building Information Modeling-Integrated Project Delivery (BIM-IPD) for Malaysian Industrialised Building System (IBS) construction projects. Malaysia Constr. Res. J. (MCRJ) 15(2), 1–15 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Papadonikolaki, E., Verbraeck, A., Wamelink, H.: Formal and informal relations within BIM-enabled supply chain partnerships. Const. Manage. Econ. 35(8–9), 531–552 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Papadonikolaki, E., Vrijhoef, R., Wamelink, H.: The interdependences of BIM and supply chain partnering: empirical explorations. Architectural Eng. Des. Manage. 12(6), 476–494 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pauwels, P., Van Deursen, D., De Roo, J., Van Ackere, T., De Meyer, R., Van de Walle, R., Van Campenhout, J.: Three-dimensional information exchange over the semantic web for the domain of architecture, engineering, and construction. Ai Edam 25(4), 317–332 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peansupap, V., Walker, D.H.T.: Information Communication Technology (ICT) implementation constraints: a construction industry perspective. Eng. Constr. Architectural Manage. 13(4), 364–379 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perumal, V.R., Bakar, A.H.A.: The needs for standardization of document towards an efficient communication in the construction industry. Acta Technica Corviniensis-Bull. Eng. 4(1), 23 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Porwal, A., Hewage, K.N.: Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects. Autom. Constr. 31, 204–214 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rankin, J.H., Luther, R.: The innovation process: adoption of information and communication technology for the construction industry. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 33(12), 1538–1546 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Robson, A., Boyd, D., Thurairajah, N.: UK construction supply chain attitudes to BIM. In: 50th ASC Annual International Conference (2014)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vrijhoef, R., Koskela, L.J., Howell, G.: Understanding construction supply chains: an alternative interpretation. In: Proceedings of 9th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, pp. 185–199 (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wikforss, Ö., Löfgren, A.: Rethinking communication in construction. J. Inform. Technol. Constr. (ITcon) 12(23), 337–346 (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wu, C., Xu, B., Mao, C., Li, X.: Overview of BIM maturity measurement tools. J. Inform. Technol. Constr. (ITcon) 22(3), 34–62 (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu, G., Liu, C., Zhao, X., Zuo, J.: Investigating the relationship between communication-conflict interaction and project success among construction project teams. Int. J. Project Manage. 35(8), 1466–1482 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xue, X., Shen, Q., Ren, Z.: Critical review of collaborative working in construction projects: business environment and human behaviors. J. Manage. Eng. 26(4), 196–208 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xue, X., Li, X., Shen, Q., Wang, Y.: An agent-based framework for supply chain coordination in construction. Automation Constr. 14(3), 413–430 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang, S., Teizer, J., Lee, J.-K., Eastman, C.M., Venugopal, M.: Building information modeling (BIM) and safety: automatic safety checking of construction models and schedules. Automation Constr. 29, 183–195 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Construction Economics and ManagementUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations