Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Essentials of Pension Economics pp 97–114Cite as

The Challenges for Public Pension Schemes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

With population ageing, life expectancy at retirement increases and the ratio of contributors to retirees decreases. To ensure solvency, defined benefit (DB) systems undergo continuous parametric reforms, including raising retirement age, whereas personal accounts, defined contribution (PA-DC) systems are endowed with automatic adjustments ensuring solvency in both their funded and pay-as-you-go (PAYG) versions, albeit at the cost of jeopardizing pension adequacy. Within financial defined contribution (FDC) and non-financial defined contribution (NDC) systems, retiring workers are given the free choice of either accepting lower benefits or maintaining benefit adequacy by postponing retirement. Moreover, following the logic of personal accounts workers can see contributions as mandatory savings rather than taxes on their labour services. The extent to which a costly transition from PAYG to fully funded systems can counteract the effects of population ageing is debatable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Auerbach, A. J., Gokhale, J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1991). Generational Accounts: A Meaningful Alternative to Deficit Accounting. In D. Bradford (Ed.), Tax Policy and the Economy (pp. 55–110). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A. J., Gokhale, J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1994). Generational Accounting: A Meaningful Way to Evaluate Fiscal Policy. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, D. (2006). Pension Economics. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan, A., & Wilke, C. B. (2004). The German Social Security System: How It Was and How It Will Be. Cambridge, MA: s.n.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan, A., & Wilke, C. B. (2006). The German Public Pension System: How It Will Become an NDC System Look-Alike. In R. Holzmann & E. Palmer (Eds.), Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes (pp. 573–610). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. M., & Weaver, K. R. (2006). Lashed to the Mast? The Politics of NDC Pension Reform. In R. Holzmann & E. Palmer (Eds.), Pension Reform Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes (pp. 345–393). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1968). Social Insurance in a Growing Economy: A Proposal for Radical Reform. National Tax Journal, 21, 368–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaratto, S. (2005). Pension Reform and Economic Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaratto, S. (2006). Transition to Fully Funded Pension Schemes: A Non-Orthodox Criticism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, Population Division. (2017). Changing Population Age Structures and Sustainable Development: A Concise Report. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. (1996). Proposals to Restructure Social Security. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disney, R. (2004). Are Contributions to Public Pension Programmes a Tax? Economic Policy, 19(39), 267–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1998). Introduction. In M. Feldstein (Ed.), Privatizing Social Security (pp. 1–29). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., & Wise, D. A. (1999). Social Security and Retirement Around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., & Wise, D. A. (2004). Social Security Programs and Retirement Around the World: Micro-Estimation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtovaya, V., & Nisticò, S. (2018). The Notional Defined Contribution Pension Scheme and the German ‘Point System’: A Comparison. German Economic Review, 19(4), 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurtovaya, V., & Nisticò, S. (2019). Does the NDC Scheme Mimic the French Point System? Applied Economics, 51(1), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R. (1994). Should Generational Accounts Replace Public Budgets and Deficits? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. (2006). Conceptualization of Non-Financial Defined Contribution Systems. In R. Holzmann & E. Palmer (Eds.), Pension Reform Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes (pp. 71–75). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A., & Persson, M. (2003). The Gains from Pension Reform. Journal of Economic Literature, XLI(1), 74–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1981). A Reappraisal of Financing Social Security. In F. Skidmore (Ed.), Social Security Financing (pp. 89–127). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019). OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oeppen, J., & Vaupel, J. W. (2002). Broken Limits to Life Expectancy. Science, 296(5570), 1029–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olshansky, S. J. (2018). The Future of Health. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 66(1), 195–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orszag, P. R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Rethinking Pension Reform: Ten Myths About Social Security. In R. Holzmann & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), New Ideas About Old Age Security. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, E. (2006). What is NDC? In R. Holzmann & E. Palmer (Eds.), Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes (pp. 17–33). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queisser, M. (1996). Pensions in Germany. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2019). World Bank Open Data. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, Cassino, Italy

    Sergio Nisticò

Authors
  1. Sergio Nisticò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Nisticò .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nisticò, S. (2019). The Challenges for Public Pension Schemes. In: Essentials of Pension Economics. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26496-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26496-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26495-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26496-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation