Advertisement

Current Approaches for Resilience Assessment

Chapter
  • 194 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter provides a brief overview of some of the more established approaches to resilience and risk assessment as practiced in other fields of engineering that may be pertinent to water management infrastructures. It also traces ASCE’s historical role in addressing risks to large infrastructure for water management. Finally, the chapter makes some recommendations as a way forward for improving resilience assessment involving greater use of numerical models.

References

  1. Abbs DJ (1999) A numerical modeling study to investigate the assumptions used in the calculation of probable maximum precipitation. Water Resour Res 35(3):785–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anagnostopoulos GG, Koutsoyiannis D, Christofides A, Efstratiadis A, Mamassis N (2010) A comparison of local and aggregated climate model outputs with observed data. Hydrol Sci J 55(7):1094e1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASCE (1973) Reevaluating spillway capacity at existing dams, ASCE task committee on the “reevaluation of the adequacy of spillways of existing dams,” Committee on hydrometeorology of the Hydraulics Division. J Hydrau1 Div ASCE 99(HY2):337–372Google Scholar
  4. ASCE (2015) Engineering for every drop. Civil Engineering (ASCE), November 2015 issue, pp 46–55Google Scholar
  5. Beauchamp J, Leconte R, Trudel M, Brissette F (2013) Estimation of the summer-fall PMP and PMF of a northern watershed under a changed climate. Water Resour Res 49(6):3852–3862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavarallo M, Asprone D, Latora V, Manfredi G, Nicosia V (2014) Assessment of urban ecosystem resilience through hybrid social–physical complex networks. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 29:608–625Google Scholar
  7. Chen L-C, Bradley AA (2006) Adequacy of using surface humidity to estimate atmospheric moisture availability for probable maximum precipitation. Water Resour Res 42(9)Google Scholar
  8. Dawdy DR, Lettenmaier DP (1987) Initiative for risk-based design. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 113(8):1041–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Good D (2015) Dams breached, bridges collapse amid South Carolina flooding. ABC News, http://abcnews.go.com/US/dams-breached-bridges-collapse-amid-south-carolina-flooding/story?id=34275744. Last Accessed 1 Dec 2015
  10. Graham WJ (2000) Should dams be modified for tile probable maximum flood. J Am Water Resour Assoc (JAWRA) 36(5):953–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hossain et al (2017) A review of approaches and recommendations for improving resilience of water management infrastructure. J Infrastruct Syst (ASCE) (in review). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hossain FAM, Degu W, Yigzaw D, Niyogi S, Burian S, Shepherd JM, Pielke R Sr. (2012) Climate feedback-based considerations to dam design, operations and water management in the 21st century. ASCE J Hydrol Eng 17(8):837–850.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hossain F, Arnold J, Beighley E, Brown C, Burian S, Chen J, Madadgar S, Mitra A, Niyogi D, Pielke RA, Tidwell V, Wegner D (2015a) Local-to-regional landscape drivers of extreme weather and climate: implications for water infrastructure resilience, infrastructure task committee report to ASCE. J Hydrol Eng 20(7).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hossain F, Arnold J, Beighley E, Brown C, Burian S, Chen J, Mitra A, Niyogi D, Pielke RA, Tidwell V, Wegner D (2015b) What do experienced water managers think of water resources of our nation and its management infrastructure? PLOS ONE 10(11):e0142073.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hydroworld (2009) TVA raising height of four dams for safe operation. http://www.hydroworld.com/articles/2009/10/tva-raising-height.html. Last Accessed 1 Dec 2015
  16. Kundzewicz ZW, Stakhiv EZ (2010) Are climate models “ready for prime time” in water resources management applications, or is more research needed? Hydrol Sci J 55(7):1085–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Micovic Z, Schaefer M, Taylor GH (2015) Uncertainty analysis for probable maximum precipitation estimates. J Hydrol 521:360–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moglen GE, Vidal GER (2014) Climate change and storm water infrastructure in the mid-atlantic region: design mismatch coming? Hydrol Eng ASCE J.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Montgomery M, Broyd T, Cornell S, Pearce O, Pocock D, Young K (2012) An innovative approach for improving infrastructure resilience. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineer, civil engineering special issue 165, November 2012 Issue, CE6, pp 27–32.  https://doi.org/10.1680/cien.11.00062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. NRC (1994) Estimating bounds on extreme precipitation events: a brief assessment, committee on meteorological analysis, prediction, and research. National Research Council (NRC)Google Scholar
  21. Ohara N, Kavvas ML, Kure S, Chen ZQ, Jang S, Tan E (2011) A physically based estimation of maximum precipitation over American river Watershed, California. J Hydrol Eng 16(4):351–361.  https://doi.org/10.1061/900(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000324
  22. Rakhecha PR, Singh VP (2009) Applied hydrometeorology. Springer, Netherlands ISBN: 978-4020-9843-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reed DA, Kapur KC, Christie RD (2009) Methodology for assessing the resilience of networked infrastructure. IEEE Syst J 3(2):174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Snyder FF (1964) Hydrology of spillway design: large structures-adequate data. J Hydraul Div ASCE 90(HY3):239–259Google Scholar
  25. Stephens GL, L’Ecuyer T, Forbes R, Gettlemen A, Golaz J-C, Bodas-Salcedo A, Suzuki K, Gabriel P, Haynes J (2010) Dreary state of precipitation in global models. J Geophys Res 115:D24211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tan E (2010) Development of a methodology for probable maximum precipitation estimation over the American river Watershed using the WRF model, PhD Dissertation. University California-Davis (UMI 3404936)Google Scholar
  27. Tofiq FA, Guven A (2015) Potential changes in inflow design flood under future climate projections for Darbandikhan Dam. J Hydrol 528:45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Upadhaya JK, Biswas N, Tam E (2014) A review of infrastructure challenges: assessing stormwater system sustainability. Can J Civ Eng 41:483–492.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Haren R, van Oldenborgh GJ, Lenderink G, Collins M, Hazeleger W (2012) SST and circulation trend biases cause an underestimation of European precipitation trends. Clim Dyn. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1401-5
  30. Yigzaw W, Hossain F (2015) Land use land cover impact on probable maximum flood and sedimentation for artificial reservoirs: a case study in Western US. J Hydrol Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yigzaw W, Hossain F, Kalyanapu A (2013) Impact of artificial reservoir size and land use/land cover patterns on estimation of probable maximum flood: the case of Folsom dam on American river. ASCE J Hydrol Eng 18(9):1180–1190.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000722CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA
  4. 4.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  5. 5.Department of Civil EngineeringThe University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  6. 6.CREÄ AffiliatesSeattleUSA
  7. 7.Earth and Atmospheric SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  8. 8.University of Colorado, CIRESBoulderUSA
  9. 9.Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA
  10. 10.Formerly with Water and Power Subcommittee, Water Resources and the Environment SubcommitteeU.S. House of RepresentativesWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations