Skip to main content

Final Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Cognitive Dynamics on Clausewitz Landscapes
  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

Conflict between cognitive institutions on a Clausewitz landscape dominated by friction and the fog-of-war enters the same realm of difficulty as confronts and afflicts the study of consciousness in higher animals (e.g., [1,2,3,4], and references therein). Cognitive submodules of institutions and higher animals become linked, at different scales and levels of organization, in tunable, dynamically shifting coalitions in response to signals arising from both internal crosstalk and external “sensory” sources. The formal description of consciousness remains highly contentious and appears to require mathematical tools familiar to the far outlands of string theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baars, B. 1988. A cognitive theory of consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace, R. 2005. Consciousness: A mathematical treatment of the neuronal global workspace model. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wallace, R. 2012. Consciousness, crosstalk, and the mereological fallacy: An evolutionary perspective. Physics of Life Reviews 9: 426–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallace, R. 2017. Computational Psychiatry: A systems biology approach to the epigenetics of mental disorder. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Watts, B. 2008. US Combat training, operational art, and strategic competence: Problems and opportunities. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wallace, R. 2010. Expanding the modern synthesis. Comptes Rendus Biologies 333: 701–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace, R. 2011. A formal approach to evolution as a self-referential language. BioSystems 106: 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wallace, R. 2014. A new formal perspective on ‘Cambrian Explosions’. Comptes Rendus Biologies 337: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallace, R., and D. Wallace. 2008. Code, context and epigenetic catalysis in gene expression. Transactions on Computational Systems Biology XI, LNBI 5750: 283–334.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wallace, R., and D. Wallace. 2016. Gene expression and its discontents: The social production of chronic disease, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Bracken, P. 2006. Net assessment, a practical guide, Parameters. Springer, 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  12. von Clausewitz, C. 1989. On War, Howard, M., P. Paret (eds.), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lykke, A. 1989. Defining military strategy. Military Review 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beyerchen, A. 1992. Clausewitz, nonlinearity, and the unpredictability of war. International Security 17: 59–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tse-Tung, M. 1963. Selected military writings of Mao Tse-Tung. PRC: Foreign Language Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wallace, R. 2015. An ecosystem approach to economic stabilization: Escaping the neoliberal wilderness. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Krepinevich, A., and B. Watts. 2009. Retaining strategic competence. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krepinevich, A., and B. Watts. 2009. Lost at the NSC, The National Interest 99: 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Armed Conflict Working Group. 2013. Armed Conflict: A model for understanding and intervention. Death Studies 37: 61088.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrick Wallace .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wallace, R. (2020). Final Remarks. In: Cognitive Dynamics on Clausewitz Landscapes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26424-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics