Skip to main content

Strength Comparison of Cement Mortar and Geopolymer Mortar

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of SECON'19 (SECON 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 46))

Abstract

In construction industry large number of buildings are repaired and retrofitted due to the decrease in the load bearing capacity of RC beams within the life span of the building. Repair materials with reduced carbon footprint and environmental sustainability have been in great demand by the construction industry worldwide. Cement is the main constituent of the mortar used for the repair and retrofitting techniques. The production of cement is energy-intensive and releases large amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) to the atmosphere that significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. It is estimated that one ton of CO2 is released into the atmosphere for every ton of ordinary Portland cement produced. Environmentally sustainable repair materials with reduced carbon footprint have been in great demand by the construction industry worldwide. Cement-free geopolymer mortars prepared from waste materials with high content of silicate aluminium and alkaline activator solution are emerging as prominent sustainable repair materials. Industrial waste Fly ash is used in this study as the replacement of cement. The current study focuses on strength comparison of cement mortar cubes and geopolymer mortar cubes in ambient curing conditions. 10M, 12M, 15M geopolymer mortar cubes are prepared for the study. Useage of geopolymer mortar leads to the reduction in cement quantity in construction industry and its use should be promoted for better performance and environmental sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ortega I et al (2018) An experimental study on RC columns repaired on all four sides with cementitious mortars. Constr Build Mater 161:53–62 (Science Direct)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karuppuchamy K et al (2018) Effect of alkaline solution with varying mix proportion on geopolymer mortar. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 310:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahajan LS et al (2017) Experimental study of conventional and geopolymer mortar. Int J Sci 5(2):2277–7261

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gouri Antherjanam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Revathy, V., Antherjanam, G. (2020). Strength Comparison of Cement Mortar and Geopolymer Mortar. In: Dasgupta, K., Sajith, A., Unni Kartha, G., Joseph, A., Kavitha, P., Praseeda, K. (eds) Proceedings of SECON'19. SECON 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26365-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26365-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26364-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26365-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics