Abstract
The general conclusion of the monograph summarizes the findings of its first and second part. It is a reminder of how the main contribution of the research concerns the development of a Critical Legal Study approach which enables a scholar to critique a piece of EU legislation and the ideology on which it is based—the mirror of the research. Subsequently, it also summarizes the results of the application of this approach to Solvency II. What is more, since this monograph refused to be classified as a nihilistic exercise, it summarizes the micro law reform design suggestion based on the conducted critique—the motor of the research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
And so, the rules of the internal insurance market are not that different from the rules of the human kingdom where one defines or is defined. Namely, in the internal insurance market there are those who set the risk-weights for assets and those that comply to the set risk-weight for assets.
- 2.
If they claim otherwise, they are simply masquerading.
- 3.
Kairys (1998), p. 55 (personally added underlineation).
- 4.
Scheppele (1989), p. 2085.
References
Kairys D (ed) (1998) The politics of law: a progressive critique. Basic Books, New York
Scheppele KL (1989) Foreword: telling stories. Mich Law Rev 87:2073–2098
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loguinova, K. (2019). General Conclusion. In: A Critical Legal Study of the Ideology Behind Solvency II. Economic and Financial Law & Policy – Shifting Insights & Values, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26357-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26357-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26356-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26357-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)