Skip to main content

APTER: Aggregated Prognosis Through Exponential Re-weighting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 867 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11653))

Abstract

This paper considers the task of learning how to make a prognosis of a patient based on his/her micro-array expression levels. The method is an application of the aggregation method as recently proposed in the literature on theoretical machine learning, and excels in its computational convenience and capability to deal with high-dimensional data. This paper gives a formal analysis of the method, yielding rates of convergence similar to what traditional techniques obtain, while it is shown to cope well with an exponentially large set of features. Those results are supported by numerical simulations on a range of publicly available survival-micro-array data sets. It is empirically found that the proposed technique combined with a recently proposed pre-processing technique gives excellent performances. All used software files and data sets are available on the authors’ website http://user.it.uu.se/~liuya610/index.html.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘The Median Isn’t the Message’ as in http://www.prognosis.org/what_does_it_mean.php.

  2. 2.

    The software is available at http://user.it.uu.se/~liuya610/index.html.

References

  1. Antoniadis, A., Fryzlewicz, P., Letué, F.: The dantzig selector in cox’s proportional hazards model. Scand. J. Stat. 37(4), 531–552 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bickel, P.J., et al.: Regularization in statistics. Test 15(2), 271–344 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bøvelstad, H.M., et al.: Predicting survival from microarray dataa comparative study. Bioinformatics 23(16), 2080–2087 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dave, S.S., et al.: Prediction of survival in follicular lymphoma based on molecular features of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. N. Engl. J. Med. 351(21), 2159–2169 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan, J., Lv, J.: Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 70(5), 849–911 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Freund, Y., Iyer, R., Schapire, R.E., Singer, Y.: An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4, 933–969 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Goeman, J.: Penalized: L1 (lasso) and l2 (ridge) penalized estimation in GLMs and in the Cox model. R package version 09–21 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goeman, J.J.: L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model. Biometrical J. 52(1), 70–84 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gönen, M., Heller, G.: Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regression. Biometrika 92(4), 965–970 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Jakobson, C., Feinsod, M., Nemirovsky, Y.: Low frequency noise and drift in ion sensitive field effect transistors. Sens. Actuators B: Chemical 68(1), 134–139 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Juditsky, A., Rigollet, P., Tsybakov, A.B., et al.: Learning by mirror averaging. Ann. Stat. 36(5), 2183–2206 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalbfleisch, J.D., Prentice, R.L.: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley, New York (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, R.S.: Re-analysis of molecular features in predicting survival in follicular lymphoma. report (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nemirovsky, A., Yudin, D.: Problem Complexity and Method Efficiency in Optimization. Wiley, Chichester (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raykar, V.C., Steck, H., Krishnapuram, B., Dehing-Oberije, C., Lambin, P.: On ranking in survival analysis: bounds on the concordance index. In: NIPS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, N., Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: Regularization paths for Coxs proportional hazards model via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 39(5), 1–13 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Belle, V., Pelckmans, K., Van Huffel, S., Suykens, J.A.: Improved performance on high-dimensional survival data by application of survival-SVM. Bioinformatics 27(1), 87–94 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van’t Veer, L.J., et al.: Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415(6871), 530–536 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, Y., Pelckmans, K. (2019). APTER: Aggregated Prognosis Through Exponential Re-weighting. In: Du, DZ., Duan, Z., Tian, C. (eds) Computing and Combinatorics. COCOON 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11653. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26176-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26176-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26175-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26176-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics