Skip to main content

International Perspectives on Geography Education Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Geography Education Research in the UK: Retrospect and Prospect

Part of the book series: International Perspectives on Geographical Education ((IPGE))

  • 315 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers an analysis, at the international scale, of ‘why things are the way they are’ in geography education research—although it comes with a caveat that achieving an overview of research across different national jurisdictions is problematic, and possibly even unhelpful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the time of writing, the (renamed) UK Committee of the IGU CGE is in close discussion with another UK group—the Geography Education Research Collective (GEReCo)—with a view to a probable merger. This is both practical and sensible, given that the membership of the groups overlaps considerably. Nonetheless, each group has different strengths and intentions—particularly with regard to international reach, research ambitions and publication interests. Significantly, neither group receives any form of sustained funding.

  2. 2.

    There are other specialist journals dedicated to research in geography education, including Research in Geographic Education, founded in 1999, edited by Richard Boehm and David Stea in the US and based in the Gilbert Grosvenor Center for Geographic Education at SW Texas State University, at San Marcos.

  3. 3.

    A number of other publications of influence—not least the proceedings from the IGU-CGE’s international conferences and symposia, and related spin off books such as ‘Teaching Geography for a Better World’ (Fien and Gerber 1988)—have also been produced.

  4. 4.

    The breakdown of authors is taken from the book’s stated ‘List of Contributors’ (pp. ix–xii); however, many chapters include sections contributed by authors not stated in this list—including section contributions from Taiwan, China, Brazil and Singapore—such that the actual total of authors is 33, not 26. We must also remember that for texts such as this some prospective authors will have had their contributions rejected by editors, and that the authorship of publications that emerge from conferences is sometimes rather ‘weighted’ by numbers of delegates from particular countries having being attracted by the conference theme. Ease of access to funding is a significant factor in attendance, of course.

  5. 5.

    Brooks (2017) makes the interesting point that we may be guilty of striving to be ‘overly inclusive’ in our small community of geography education researchers worldwide, given that conference papers that are lacking in rigour and culmination may be accepted for presentation at international research conferences. The reasons for this vary—from noble attempts to support academics from jurisdictions that do not normally contribute papers to international conferences (for reasons of finance, organisation of research, lack of support, etc.), to less altruistic reasons of wanting to maximise conference attendance and revenue!

  6. 6.

    Descriptions of geography education and geography education research within different national contexts are relatively common; see, for example, Reinfried (2001a, b, 2004) on Switzerland, Graves (2001) on France, Birkenhauer (2002a, b) and Schrettenbrunner (1990) on Germany, Butt (2008) on the UK, etc.

  7. 7.

    Wrigley and Kalambouka’s (2012) research identifies that in a case study of four academies, only 12% of pupils studied History or Geography at GCSE, compared to 57% in other schools locally. In one academy their research found that only a single pupil took history, with no one taking geography, at GCSE.

  8. 8.

    The Appendix includes the following sections: Executive summary, Preamble; Nature, Value and focus of geography education research; Contexts of and challenges in geography education; The development of researchers; Strategic development; Methodology; Dissemination; and Impact. The Annex includes some examples of topics for research in geography education.

  9. 9.

    Morgan (2017) interestingly considers the concept of ‘geographical ignorance’, through reflecting on the need for a ‘knowledge turn’ in school geography. By applying the work of US geographer Martin Lewis, he discusses that a certain level of public ignorance of geography is inevitable, but highlights that modern versions of the geography national curriculum in England and Wales may ironically serve to promote this state of affairs.

  10. 10.

    The international publications in English analysed by Bagoly-Simó (2014) encompass, as one sample, the journals International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, Journal of Geography and Geography. In addition, publications in German from Geographie und ihre Didaktik, GW-Unterricht, Praxis Geographie, Geographie und Schule, and Geographie Heute, along with journal articles, monographs and book chapters from Hungary, Romania, Spain and Latin America (including Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, Cuba) were represented in other samples.

References

  • Bagoly-Simó, P. (2014, August 22). Coordinates of research in geography education. A longitudinal analysis of research publications between 1900–2014 in international comparison. Paper delivered at IGU Regional Conference, Krakow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education., 54(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz, S., Heffron, S., & Huynh, N. (Eds.). (2013). A roadmap for 21st century geography education research. A report from the Geography Education Research Committee. Washington DC: AAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2004). David Bell urges schools and the geography community to help reverse a decline in the subject. OfSTED press release, November 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béneker, T., & van der Schee, J. (2015). Future geographies and geography education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(4), 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkenhauer, J. (2002a). Secondary level geography: A comparative analysis of study programmes in Germany. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education., 11(3), 262–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkenhauer, J. (2002b). Proposals for a geography curriculum ‘2000+’ for Germany. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education., 11(3), 271–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, R. (2002). Fostering research in geographic education: The Gilbert M. Grosvenor center for geographic education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, A. (2008). What is geography?. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2017, February 27). Interview with Clare Brooks at UCL Institute of Education, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C., Butt, G., & Fargher, M. (Eds.). (2017). The power of geographical thinking. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, G. (2008). Is the future secure for geography education? Geography, 93(3), 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, G., & Collins, G. (2013). Can geography cross ‘the divide’? In D. Lambert & M. Jones (Eds.), Debates in geography education (pp. 291–301). Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, G., & Lambert, D. (2014). International perspectives on the future of geography education and the role of national standards. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education., 23(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, G., & Collins, G. (2018). Understanding the gap between schools and universities. In M. Jones & D. Lambert (Eds.), Debates in Geography Education (2nd ed., pp. 263–274). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N., Fuller, D., & Lambert, D. (2007). Geography without borders’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32, 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, R. (2006). International geographical education past, present and future. In J. Lidstone & M. Williams (Eds.), Geographical Education in a changing world (pp. xiii–xv). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1998). Learning: the treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fien, J., & Gerber, R. (Eds.). (1988). Teaching geography for a better world. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd

    Google Scholar 

  • Foskett, N., & Marsden, B. (Eds.). (1998). A bibliography of geographical education 1970–1997. Sheffield: Geographical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, K., & Stevenson, H. (2019). Global education reform: Understanding the movement. In Educational review. Special Issue: The Global education reform Movement: Contemporary developments and future trajectories (Vol. 71, Issue 1, pp. 1–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2013). Education: An anatomy of the discipline. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Report. (1980). The twelfth annual Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes towards the public schools. Phi Delta Kappa, 61(1), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, R. (2000). International research in geographical education: Reflections from the retiring chair of the commission on geographical education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 9(3), 195–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, R. (2001). The state of geographical education around the world. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education., 10(4), 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, R., & Williams, M. (2000). Overview and international perspectives. In A. Kent (Ed.), Reflective practice in geography teaching. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersmehl, P. (2006). Teaching geography. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. (2002). The nature of geographical knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A. (1993). Schools and universities: The great divide. Geography, 78(4), 338–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, N. (2001). The evolution of research in geographical education in France. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(1), 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S. (2004). Who are ‘we’? An important question for geography’s future. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 715–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haubrich, H. (1996a). Foreword. In M. Williams (Ed.), Understanding geographical and environmental education. The role of research (pp. xi–xii). London: Cassells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (1981). A survey of global understanding of American college students. Professional Geographer., 33(2), 235–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter, R., & Schneuwly, B. (2012). Institutionalisation of educational sciences and the dynamics of their development. European Educational Research Journal, 1(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtsonen, L., & Tammilehto, M. (Eds.). (2001). Innovative Practices in Geographical Education. Proceedings of the Helsinki Symposium of the IGU-CGE. Helsinki: IGU-CGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGU CGE (International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education). (1992). International charter for geography education. Washington: IGU CGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGU CGE (International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education). (2015). International declaration on research in geography education. Moscow: IGU CGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IGU CGE (International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education). (2016). International charter for geography education. Beijing: IGU CGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Geographic Education (1984). Guidelines for geographic education: Elementary and secondary schools. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers and the National Council for Geographic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. (1979). Geography and geographers: Anglo-American human geography since 1945. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, A., Rawling, E., & Robinson, A. (Eds.). (2004). Geographical education: expanding horizons in a shrinking world. Glasgow: SAGT with CGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. (2011a). Reviewing the case for geography, and the ‘knowledge turn’ in the English National Curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. (2011b). Reframing school geography: A capability approach. In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 127–140). London. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. (2015). Research in geography education. In G. Butt (Ed.), MasterClass in geography education (pp. 15–30). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidstone, J., & Gerber, R. (1998). Theoretical underpinnings of geographical and environmental education research: hiding our light under various bushels. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 7(2), 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidstone, J. (2005). The worst taught subject: International perspectives on Bill Marsden’s guest editorial. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education., 14(1), 61–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lidstone, J., & Williams, M. (2006a). Geographical education in a changing world. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lidstone, J., & Williams, M. (2006b). Researching change and changing research in geographical education. In J. Lidstone & M. Williams (Eds.), Geographical education in a changing world (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, W. (2005). Guest editorial reflections on geography: The worst taught subject? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education., 14(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2017). The making of geographical ignorance. Geography, 102(1), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. New York: NCEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Geographic Education (NCGE) (2000). A bibliography of geographical education. Indiana: National Council for Geographic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natoli, S. (1986). The evolving nature of geography. In S. Wronski & D. Bragaw (Eds.), Social studies and the social sciences: A fifty year perspective (pp. 94–109). Washington DC: National Council for the Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawling, E. (2004). Introduction: School geography around the world. In A. Kent, E. Rawling, & A. Robinson (Eds.), Geographical education: Expanding horizons in a shrinking world. SAGT with CGE: Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinfried, S. (2001a). Curricular changes in the teaching of geography in Swiss upper secondary schools: An attempt to develop skills for lifelong learning. Journal of Geography, 100(6), 320–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinfried, S. (2001b). Ready for the twenty-first century? The impact of curriculum reform on geography education in upper secondary schools in Switzerland. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10(4), 421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinfried, S. (2004). Do curriculum reforms affect classroom teaching in geography? The case study of Switzerland? International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 13(3), 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, D. (2015). Reading the road map for 21st century geography education in the United States. Geography, 100(1), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2012). How GERM is affecting schools around the world. Retrieved from https://pasisahlberg.com/text-test/.

  • Schrettenbrunner, H. (1990). Geography in general education in the Federal Republic of Germany. GeoJournal, 20(1), 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, F. (2003). Exploring relationships between teaching and research in geography education. In R. Gerber (Ed.), International handbook on geographical education (pp. 285–300). Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solem, M., & Boehm, R. (2018a). Research in geography education: Moving from declarations and road maps to actions. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(3), 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solem, M., & Boehm, R. (2018b). Transformative research in geography education: The role of a research coordination network. The Professional Geographer, 70(3), 374–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stannard, K. (2003). Earth to Academia: On the need to reconnect university and school geography. Area, 35, 316–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoltman, J. (1992). Geographic education in the United States: The renaissance of the 1980s. In M. Naish (Ed.), Geography and education: National and international perspectives (pp. 262–275). London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Schee, J., Schoenmaker, G., Trimp, H., & van Westrhenen, H. (Eds). (1996). Innovation in geographical education. Utrecht/Amsterdam: IGU and Centre for Geographical Education of the Free University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P., Wittrock, B., & Whitley, R. (Eds.). (1993). Discourses on society: the shaping of the social science disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (Ed.). (1996a). Understanding geographical education: The role of research. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (Ed.). (1996b). Positivism and the quantitative tradition. In M. Williams (Ed.), Understanding geographical education: The role of research (pp. 6–11). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (1998). A review of research in geographical education. In A. Kent (Ed.), Issues for research in geographical education. Research forum (Vol. 1, pp. 1–10). London: Institute of Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2003). Research in geographical education: The search for impact. In R. Gerber (Ed.), International handbook on geographical education (pp. 259–272). Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, M. (1992). International geography: The IGU commission on education. In M. Naish (Ed.), Geography and education: National and international perspectives (pp. 233–246). London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, T., & Kalambouka, A. (2012). Academies and achievement: Setting the record straight. Accessed March 21, 2013 from www.changingschools.org.uk.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham Butt .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Butt, G. (2020). International Perspectives on Geography Education Research. In: Geography Education Research in the UK: Retrospect and Prospect. International Perspectives on Geographical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25954-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25954-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25953-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25954-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics