Abstract
This chapter explores the influences on the researcher’s choice of research methods in geography education. In doing so it inevitably touches on the types of research themes that tend to be chosen by geography education researchers, and on the scale and focus of their research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Morgan also criticises the ‘doctoral experience’ of many education researchers, which he believes increase the problems of ‘Methodism’.
- 2.
Nonetheless, there may be very significant differences in the funding and staffing available to complete the research, the resources at the researcher’s disposal, the existing support structures, and the means by which research findings can be disseminated.
- 3.
The British Education Research Association (BERA 2011) guidelines act, for British researchers in education, as a standard for the review of ethical matters before any research is undertaken.
References
Bell, J. (1993). Doing your research project. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
British Educational Research Association. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA.
Burke Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Butt, G. (2003). Geography teachers as action researchers. In R. Gerber (Ed.), International handbook on geographical education (pp. 271–284). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Butt, G. (Ed.). (2015). Masterclass in geography education. London: Bloomsbury.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.
Clough, P., & Nutbrown, C. (2007). A student’s guide to methodology (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social science research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St. Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
Elliott, J. (1978). What is action research in schools? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 10(4), 355–357.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Furlong, J. (2013). Education: An anatomy of the discipline. London: Routledge.
Furlong, J., & Oancea, A. (2005). Assessing quality in applied and practice-based educational research. ESRC TLRP seminar series. (December 1) Oxford University Department of Educational Studies.
Gerber, R., & Williams, M. (2000). Overview and international perspectives. In A. Kent (Ed.), Reflective practice in geography teaching. London: Paul Chapman.
Grey, D. (2004). Doing research in the real world. London: Sage.
Hammersley, M. (1993). On the teacher as researcher. Educational Action Research, 1(3), 425–445.
Hillcoat, J. (1996). Action research. In M. Williams (Ed.), Understanding geographical and environmental education. The role of research (pp. 150–161). London: Cassells.
Jones, M. (2015). Writing a research proposal. In G. Butt (Ed.), Masterclass in geography education (pp. 113–127). London: Bloomsbury.
Kent, A. (Ed.). (2000). Reflective practice in geography teaching. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Kwan, T., & Lee, J. (1994). A reflective report on an action research towards understandings of action research held by geography teachers. In H. Haubrich (Ed.), Europe and the world in geography education (pp. 387–406). Nurnberg: IGU.
Lambert, D. (2015). Research in geography education. In G. Butt (Ed.), MasterClass in geography education (pp. 15–30). London: Bloomsbury.
Lambert, D., & Jones, M. (Eds.). (2017). Debates in geography education (2nd edn). London: Routledge.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Lidstone, J., & Williams, M. (Eds.), (2006). Geographical education in a changing world: Past experience, current trends and future challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lidstone, J., & Williams, M. (2006a). Researching change and changing research in geographical education. In J. Lidstone & M. Williams (Eds.), Geographical education in a changing world (pp. 1–17). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lidstone, J., & Williams, M. (2006b). Geographical education in a changing world. Dordrecht: Springer.
Maxwell, J. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. London: Kogan Page.
McNiff, J. (1988). Action research. Principles and practice. London: Macmillan.
Morgan, J. (2015). Discussion to part III. In G. Butt (Ed.), Masterclass in geography education (pp. 145–147). London: Bloomsbury.
Morrison, T. (2007). Emotional intelligence, emotion and social work: Context, characteristics, complications and contribution. British Journal of Social Work, 37(2), 245–263.
Naish, M. (1996). Action research for a new professionalism in geography education. In A. Kent, D. Lambert, M. Naish, & F. Slater (Eds.), Geography in education: Viewpoints on teaching and learning (pp. 321–343). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. The Qualitative Report, 11, 3.
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pring, R. (2012). Importance of philosophy in the conduct of educational research. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 1(1), 23–30.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schrettenbrunner, H. (1993). How to judge quality in research. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 2(1), 73–75.
Schrettenbrunner, H., & van Westrhenen, J. (Eds.). (1992). Empirical research and geography teaching. Nederlandse Geografische Studies, 142.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). Introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Stenhouse, L. (1981). What counts as research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 29(2), 103–114.
Symonds, J., & Gorard, S. (2008). The death of mixed methods: Research labels and their casualties. The British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, September 3–6.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. London: Sage.
Weeden, P. (2015). Approaches to research in geography education. In G. Butt (Ed.), Masterclass in geography education (pp. 101–111). London: Bloomsbury.
Whitty, G. (1997). Creating Quasi-Markets in education: A review of recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. Review of research in education., 22(1), 3–47.
Williams, M. (Ed.). (1996). Positivism and the quantitative tradition. In M.Williams (Ed.), Understanding geographical education: The role of research (pp. 6–13). London: Cassell.
Williams, M. (1998). A review of research in geographical education. In A. Kent (Ed.) Issues for research in geographical education. Research forum 1 (pp. 1–10). London: Institute of Education Press.
Williams, M. (2003). Research in geographical education: The search for impact. In R. Gerber (Ed.) International handbook on geographical education (pp. 259–272). XX Kluwer.
Wilson, M. (2015). Ethical considerations. In G. Butt (Ed.), Masterclass in Geography Education (pp. 129–144). London: Bloomsbury.
Yates, L. (2004). What does good educational research look like? Situating a field and its practices. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butt, G. (2020). Geography Education Research Methods. In: Geography Education Research in the UK: Retrospect and Prospect. International Perspectives on Geographical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25954-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25954-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25953-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25954-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)