Advertisement

Sociotechnical Issues

  • Mary J. ThornbushEmail author
  • Oleg Golubchikov
Chapter
  • 203 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)

Abstract

The influence of technology in smart cities is inevitable and continues to emerge from an entrepreneurial approach stemming from the business model. Both hardware and software components of technology are part of technical advancements in technologically advanced cities. Although more work has been published on smart cities, especially since the early 2010s, there remain uncertainties and challenges posed by smart cities that, in practice, could pose problems for society. This chapter addresses some of these social issues, including democratic governance opposed by monitoring and control in these technocratic (rather than democratic) cities. Security is addressed as Big Data and Open Access information amasses on the Internet and can be accessed worldwide. This represents one of the key areas, especially with the diffusion of the public-private boundary caused by continued monitoring and the accumulation of information on people, their movements and behaviours.

Keywords

Technology Economic/entrepreneurial approach Governance Democracy  Surveillance  Cybersecurity  Big Data Internet of things/IoT Networks Social engagement  

References

  1. Al Nuaimi E, Al Neyadi H, Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J (2015) Applications of big data to smart cities. J Internet Ser Appl 6(25):15 p.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-015-0041-5
  2. Anthopoulos L (2017) Smart utopia vs smart reality: learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities 63:128–148. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthopoulos LG, Fitsilis P (2015) Understanding smart city business models: a comparison. WWW’15 companion, Florence, Italy, 18–22 May 2015, pp 529–533. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2743908
  4. Anttiroiko A-V (2016) City-as-a-platform: the rise of participatory innovation platforms in Finnish cities. Sustainability 8(9):922 (31 p).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barragán A, Terrados J (2017) Sustainable cities: an analysis of the contribution made by renewable energy under the umbrella of urban metabolism. Int J Sus Dev Plann 12(3):416–424.  https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-416-424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates O, Friday A (2017) Beyond data in the smart city: repurposing existing campus IoT. IEEE Pervasive Comput 16(2):54–60.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2017.30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Causone F, Sangelli A, Pagliano L, Carlucci S (2017) An exergy analysis for Milano smart city. Energy Proced 111:867–876.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho L (2017) Mass capture: the making of non-citizens and the mainland travel permit for Hong Kong and Macau residents. Mobilities 12(2):188–198.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1292776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chourabi H, Nam T, Walker S, Gil-Garcia JR, Mellouli S, Nahori K, Pardo TA, Scholl HJ (2012) IEEE Xplore, 09 Feb 2012, pp 2289–2297. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.615
  10. Cosgrave E, Arbuthnot K, Tryfonas T (2013) Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: a systems approach for smart cities. Procedia Comput Sci 16:668–677.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doctorow C (2014) Riot control drone that fires paintballs, pepper-spray and rubber bullets at protesters. Boing Boing, 17 June 2014. https://boingboing.net/2014/06/17/riotcontroldronethatpaintb. Accessed 26 June 2015
  12. Galvão JR, Moreira L, Gaspar G, Vindeirinho S, Leitão S (2017) Energy system retrofit in a public services building. Manage Environ Qual 28(3):302–314.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2014-0028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He Y, Stojmenovic I, Liu Y, Gu Y (2014) Smart city. Int J Distrib Sens Net 10(5):2.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/867593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hollands RG (2015) Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 8:61–77.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holotescu C, Slavici T, Cismariu L, Gotiu LOL, Grosseck G, Andone D (2016) MOOCs for innovative entrepreneurship in smart cities. World J Educ Technol 8(3):245–251. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v8i3.832Google Scholar
  16. Lombardi P, Abastante F, Moghadam ST, Toniolo J (2017) Multicriteria spatial decision support systems for future urban energy retrofitting scenarios. Sustainability 9:1252 (pp 14). https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9071252
  17. Luque-Ayala A, Marvin S (2016) The maintenance of urban circulation: an operational logic of infrastructural control. Environ Plann D 34(2):191–208.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815611422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. March H, Ribera-Fumaz R (2016) Smart contradictions: the politics of making Barcelona a self-sufficient city. Eur Urban Reg Stud 23(4):816–830.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414554488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marino C, Nucara A, Pietrafesa M (2015) Electrolytic hydrogen production from renewable source, storage and reconversion in fuel cells: the system of the “Mediterranea” University of Reggio Calabria. Energy Proced 78:818–823.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mattoni B, Gugliermetti F, Bisegna F (2015) A multilevel method to assess and design the renovation and integration of smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc 15:105–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Menniti D, Bayod-Rújula AA, Burgio A, García DAL, Leonowicz Z (2017) Solar energy and PV systems in smart cities. Int J Photoenergy 3574859, p 2.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3574859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Odendaal N (2006) Towards the digital city in South Africa: issues and constraints. J Urban Technol 13(3):29–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10630730601145997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pollio A (2016) Technologies of austerity urbanism: the “smart city” agenda in Italy (2011–2013). Urban Geogr 37(4):514–534.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1118991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramírez CA, Barragán RC, García-Torales G, Larios VM (2016) Low-power device for wireless sensor network for smart cities. IEEE Xplore, 13 Feb 2017, p 3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LAMC.2016.7851298
  25. Rose G (2017) Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 107(4):779–793.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1270195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sadowski J (2016) Selling smartness: visions and politics of the smart city. Doctoral thesis, Arizona State University, p 223 https://repository.asu.edu/items/40245
  27. Sadowski J, Pasquale F (2015) The spectrum of control: a social theory of the smart city. University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, Legal studies research paper no. 2015–26. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2653860
  28. Sharma AK, Dogra VK (2017) Preparation of papers—potential alternate energy resources for sustainability: a must need for a top pilgrimage city. Energy Proced 115:173–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thornbush M, Golubchikov O, Bouzarovski S (2013) Sustainable cities targeted by combined mitigation–adaptation efforts for future-proofing. Sustain Cities Soc 9:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Villanueva-Rosales N, Cheu RL, Gates A, Rivera N, Mondragon O, Cabrera S, Ferregut C, Carrasco C, Nazarian S, Taboada H, Larios VM, Barbosa-Santillan L, Svitek M, Pribyl O, Horak T, Procazkova D (2015) A collaborative, interdisciplinary initiative for a smart cities innovation network. IEEE Xplore, 28 Dec 2015, pp 1–2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISC2.2015.7366179
  31. Wiig A (2014) After the smart city: global ambitions and urban policymaking in Philadelphia. Doctoral thesis, Temple University, p 326. https://digital.library.temple.edu/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/294272
  32. Wiig A (2015) IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City 19(2–3):23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiig A (2016) The empty rhetoric of the smart city: from digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia. Urban Geogr 37(4):535–553.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1065686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wiig A, Wyly E (2016) Introduction: thinking through the politics of the smart city. Urban Geogr 37(4):485–493.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1178479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wigginton NS, Fahrenkamp-Uppenbrink J, Wible B, Malakoff D (2016) Cities are the future: rapid urbanization is overtaxing the planet, but it may not have to. Science 352(6288):904–905.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6288.904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang X, Hes D, Wu Y, Hafkamp W, Lu W, Bayulken B, Schnitzer H, Li F (2016) Catalyzing sustainable urban transformations towards smarter, healthier cities through urban ecological infrastructure, regenerative development, eco towns and regional prosperity. J Clean Prod 122:2–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zotano MAG, Bersini H (2017) A data-driven approach to assess the potential of Smart Cities: the case of open data for Brussels Capital Region. Energy Proced 111:750–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of Geography and PlanningCardiff UniversityCardiffWales, UK

Personalised recommendations