Skip to main content

Choosing a Tangible Strategic Focus Rather Than Building Upon an Abstract Vision

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Thinking for Strategy

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 4856 Accesses

Abstract

A key challenge faced by many strategy development and review initiatives, whether conducted internally or supported by external consultants or experts, is where to start. Traditional strategy research suggests starting by formulating a vision and a mission, describing the core ideology and envisioned future. Others recommend taking a resource-based approach, focusing on capabilities as the foundation for competitive advantage. More recently, authors such as Christensen, argue that the design of any strategy should start with questions related to customer needs or jobs-to-be-done. The novel concept of strategic focus as the primary dimension along which to compete and differentiate is introduced. Any strategy development should start by identifying the firm’s strategic focus, that is, whether the firm wants to compete and excel by being customer centric, by focusing on product and service innovation, by leveraging core capabilities, or by differentiating around financials. Successful firms primarily compete by being different or superior along exactly one of those dimensions and industry average along the three other ones. The target strategic focus is determined based on the chosen target industry, the environment analysis outcome, and the expected desirability and uniqueness.

The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do—Michael Porter

A preliminary version of parts of this chapter has been presented at the 36th Strategic Management Society Annual International Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2016 and has been published as Diderich (2017).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term strategy as such applies to a single firm, a business unit, or a brand within a business unit.

  2. 2.

    A firm is said to be “stuck in the middle” if it does not offer a distinct value proposition that attracts customers. Stuck in the middle firms usually offer multiple mediocre value propositions that customers are unable to identify with or distinguish between and as such are not attracted by them.

  3. 3.

    A buyer driven industry is an industry in which the buyer, rather than the firm, dictates the strategic focus the firm must follow.

  4. 4.

    The “five whys” method is an iterative technique used to explore the cause-and-effect relationships underlying a particular statement. The “why” question is repeated five times. Each answer forms the basis of the next why question.

  5. 5.

    The KID is a standardized Key Information Document required by the MiFID (Markets in Financial Instruments Directive) directive of the European Union to be provided to any investor ahead of their investment decision.

References

  • Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016). Competing against luck: The story of innovation and customer choice. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1996). Building your company’s vision. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academy.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diderich, C. (2017). Initiating the strategy process using design thinking. Change Management Strategy eJournal, 9(8). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2927941 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2927941.

  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. D., & Lenox, M. J. (2013). The strategist’s toolkit. Charlottesville, VA: Darden Business Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehl, R. O. (2000). Design of experiments: Statistical principles of research design and analysis. Boston, MA: Duxbury-Thomson Learning.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, M. (2014). The innovator’s hypothesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1995). The discipline of market leaders: Choose your customers, narrow your focus, dominate your market. New York, NY: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2013). The business model: A theoretically anchored robust construct for strategic analysis. Strategic Organization, 11(4), 403–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Diderich, C. (2020). Choosing a Tangible Strategic Focus Rather Than Building Upon an Abstract Vision. In: Design Thinking for Strategy. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25875-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics