Skip to main content

Gaining a Collective Understanding of the Strategy Development Challenge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Thinking for Strategy

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 4834 Accesses

Abstract

In Lewis Carroll’s novel Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Alice asks the cat which way to go? To which the cat replied, “that depends on where you want to go?” Similarly, in strategy design, it is important to have a goal in mind before starting. This goal, broadly speaking, is made up of two characteristics, that is, the target industry in which to compete, and guiding principles to follow. Defining these two characteristics sets the stage for successfully designing a firm’s strategy. Combined with identifying the key stakeholders that need to be involved at one point or the other during the strategy design process, an initial budget, an expected timeline, an innovation culture, an inherent risks analysis, as well as an assessment of the capacity to change of the firm, they form the strategy brief. The strategy brief serves as engagement to develop a new or revised strategy and offers a collective understanding of the targeted goals.

It always seems impossible until it is done—Nelson Mandela

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An axiom is a statement that is taken to be true and serves as a premise for reasoning and arguing about strategy.

References

  • Carroll, L. (1865). Alice in wonderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2005). 10 rules for strategic innovators. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J., Ogilvie, T., & Brozenske, R. (2014). The design for growth field book. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • May, M. E. (2016). Winning the brain game. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mootee, I. (2013). Design thinking for strategic innovation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zook, C. (2004). Beyond the core: Expand your market without abandoning your roots. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Diderich, C. (2020). Gaining a Collective Understanding of the Strategy Development Challenge. In: Design Thinking for Strategy. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25875-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics