Skip to main content

Seismic Response of the Temple of Pythian Apollo in Rhodes Island and Recommendations for Its Restoration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Nondestructive Evaluation and Monitoring Technologies, Documentation, Diagnosis and Preservation of Cultural Heritage

Abstract

In this paper, the response of a restored part of the ancient Temple of Pythian Apollo under strong seismic motions is examined. The monument is located on the ancient Acropolis of Rhodes and, in its present condition, consists of a single free-standing column and a colonnade composed of three columns and an entablature. Only a few drums contain ancient parts found in the excavations, while the rest is newer material, placed during the Italian restoration of 1937-38. The examined structure corresponds to the monument after a probable restoration scenario, which accounts for the replacement of all complements that were installed during the Italian restoration with new parts from natural or artificial stone. The performed investigation concerns the response of the structure under six strong seismic excitations, chosen to be compatible with the tectonic environment and past seismic events, scaled to two levels of ground acceleration, corresponding to return periods of 500 years and 1000 years. The structural analyses were performed with the finite element software ABAQUS. The monument was modelled using three-dimensional deformable finite elements, while special attention was paid to the modelling of the mortar that connects structural members, as well as the interface between the drums, where rocking and sliding are allowed. The results of the analyses lead to various conclusions about the response of the structure under the considered seismic scenarios, including the danger of collapse of the monument, the residual displacements induced by the earthquakes, the stress levels that develop in the structure and across the interfaces and the expected damage to the structural members. Based on these results, conclusions are drawn regarding the adequacy or not of the strength capacity of the proposed new parts (natural and artificial stones and connecting mortar), while the possibility of damage to ancient parts during earthquakes is also examined. The main conclusion is that, if the structure remained undamaged, it could survive five out of six of the examined earthquakes, except of the stand-alone column which collapses in half of them. However, this is not the expected situation, since damage will occur to several new and ancient parts during a strong seismic event, increasing significantly the vulnerability of the structure and the risk of partial or total collapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen, R.H., Oppenheim, I.J., Parker, A.R., Bielak, J.: On the dynamic response of rigid body assemblies. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 14, 861–876 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Konstantinidis, D., Makris, N.: Seismic response analysis of multidrum classical columns. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34, 1243–1270 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Psycharis, I.N.: Dynamic behaviour of rocking two-block assemblies. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19, 555–575 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sinopoli, A.: Dynamic analysis of a stone column excited by a sine wave ground motion. Appl. Mech. Rev. 44, S246 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasiou, M., Psycharis, I.N., Vayas, I.: Verification of numerical models used for the analysis of ancient temples. In: Prohitech Conference, Rome (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Psycharis, I.N., Lemos, J.V., Papastamatiou, D.Y., et al.: Numerical study of the seismic behaviour of a part of the Parthenon Pronaos. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32, 2063–2084 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stefanou, I., Psycharis, I.N., Georgopoulos, I.: Dynamic response of reinforced masonry columns in classical monuments. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 4325–4337 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stefanou, I., Vardoulakis, I., Mavraganis, A.: Dynamic motion of a conical frustum over a rough horizontal plane. Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 46, 114–124 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Housner, G.W.: The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 53, 403–417 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Psycharis, I.N., Papastamatiou, D.Y., Alexandris, A.P.: Parametric investigation of the stability of classical columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29, 1093–1109 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cundall, P.A.: Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model - part I: a scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 25, 107–116 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ABAQUS: User’s Manual. Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Papantonopoulos, C., Psycharis, I.N., Papastamatiou, D.Y., et al.: Numerical prediction of the earthquake response of classical columns using the distinct element method. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 1699–1717 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Toumbakari, E., Psycharis, I.N.: Parametric investigation of the seismic response of a column of the Aphrodite Temple in Amathus, Cyprus. In: 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. EFEHR: European Facility for Earthquake Hazard and Risk. http://www.efehr.org

  16. European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Design of structures for earthquake resistance – part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998-1. Greek Annex (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart, J.P., Archuleta, R.J., Power, M.S.: Earthquake spectra issue about NGA (guest editors). Earthq. Spectra 24, 341 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bozorgnia, Y., Abrahamson, N.A., Al Atik, L., Ancheta, T.D., Atkinson, G.M., Baker, J.W., Baltay, A., Boore, D.M., Campbell, K.W., Chiou, B.S.-J., Darragh, R., Day, S., Donahue, J., Graves, R.W., Gregor, N., Hanks, T., Idriss, I.M., Kamai, R., Kishida, T., Kottke, A., Mahin, S.A., Rezaeian, S., Rowshandel, B., Seyhan, E., Shahi, S., Shantz, T., Silva, W., Spudich, P., Stewart, J.P., Watson-Lamprey, J., Wooddell, K., Youngs, R.: NGA-West2 research project. Earthq. Spectra 30(3), 973–987 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bindi, D., Pacor, F., Luzi, L., Puglia, R., Massa, M., Ameri, G., Paolucci, R.: Ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian strong motion database. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 9(6), 1899–1920 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akkar, S., Sandikkaya, M.A., Bommer, J.J.: Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 12(1), 359–387 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kardoutsou, V., Taflampas, I., Psycharis, I.N.: A new pulse indicator for the classification of ground motions. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 107(3), 1356–1364 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Greek Ministry of Culture for their cooperation and the financing of the Research Project of Pythian Apollo Temple that has made this publication possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. N. Psycharis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Psycharis, I.N. et al. (2019). Seismic Response of the Temple of Pythian Apollo in Rhodes Island and Recommendations for Its Restoration. In: Osman, A., Moropoulou, A. (eds) Nondestructive Evaluation and Monitoring Technologies, Documentation, Diagnosis and Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Springer Proceedings in Materials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25763-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics