Skip to main content

Nonprofit Organizations’ Views on Corporate Foundations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Corporate Foundations

Part of the book series: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies ((NCSS))

  • 834 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to provide a deeper understanding of how nonprofit organizations view their collaborations with corporate foundations. The views of nonprofit organizations presented in this chapter explain nonprofit organizations’ current practices in engaging in these collaborations, including the associated (social) benefits and challenges. The exploratory study was based on 23 semi-structured interviews with nonprofit employees, corporate foundations, and experts in the field conducted between October 2016 and March 2017. The results indicate that employees of nonprofits use three different views for corporate foundations. They consider corporate foundations as (1) moral agents of their founding firms, in which case the foundations hold resources that the nonprofits need in order to do their job as experts in addressing social issues; (2) they regard corporate foundations as instrumental agents of companies, where collaborations should create a win-win situation for the founding firm of the foundation as well as for the nonprofit organization; and (3) nonprofits see corporate foundations as change agents of their parent companies, in which corporate foundations actively work together with nonprofits to tackle social issues. The results further imply that it is difficult to describe one typical corporate foundation (as with the chapter of Bethmann and von Schnurbein), and working with them as nonprofits requires a flexible view on what a corporate foundation may entail, their focus, and their goals and should adapt their practices accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I., Martin-Cavanna, J., & Rey-Garcia, M. (2012). Assessing and advancing foundation transparency: Corporate foundations as a case study. The Foundation Review, 4(3), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethmann, S., & von Schnurbein, G. (2015). Effective governance of corporate foundations (No. 8). University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. O., Helland, E., & Smith, J. K. (2006). Corporate philanthropic practices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(5), 855–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P., Magalhães, I. d. O., Di Tella, A., Faure, E., Hizette, D., Piette, I., & Salole, G. (2008). Foundations in the European Union: Facts and figures. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods. Business research methods (12th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, K. L., McComish, J. F., & Greenberg, R. (2000). Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription. Qualitative Health Research, 10(5), 703–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautier, A., & Pache, A. C. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 343–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, J. D. (2013). Keeping your corporate foundation compliant. Financial Executive, 29(9), 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herlin, H., & Pedersen, J. T. (2013). Corporate foundations, catalysts of NGO-business partnerships? The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 50, 58–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A., & Hartley, V. (2014). Corporate foundations – A global perspective. London: Corporate Citizenship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M., & Fourie, R. (2015). Contrasting classic, Straussian, and constructivist grounded theory: Methodological and philosophical conflicts. The Qualitative Report, 20(8), 1270–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G., Moon, B., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liket, K., & Simaens, A. (2015). Battling the devolution in the research on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(2), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, K., Scaife, W., & Crissman, K. (2006). How and why small to medium size enterprises (SMEs) engage with their communities: An Australian study. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, J. (2001). Corporate Foundation als PR-Instrument. Rahmenbedingungen – Erfolgswirkungen – Management. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minciullo, M., & Pedrini, M. (2011). Italian corporate foundations and the challenge of multiple stakeholder interests. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(2), 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mindlin, S. E. (2012). A study of governance practices in corporate foundations. Revista de Administração, 47(3), 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovits, C. M. (2006). Corporate-sponsored foundations and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(3), 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice – A guide for social science students and researcher. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roza, L., Shachar, I., Meijs, L. C. P. M., & Hustinx, L. (2017). The nonprofit case for corporate volunteering: A multi-level perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 37(11–12), 746–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, B., & Post, F. R. (1993). A moral basis for corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 745–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachwitz, R. (1994). Stiftungen: nutzen, führen und errichten; ein Handbuch. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toepler, S. (1996). Das gemeinnützige Stiftungswesen in der modernen demokratischen Gesellschaft: Ansätze zu einer ökonomischen Betrachtungsweise. München: Maecenata Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varcoe, L., & Sloane, N. (2003). Corporate foundations – Building a sustainable foundation for corporate giving. London: Business in the Community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitcu, A., Lungu, E., Vitcu, L., & Marcu, A. (2007). Multi-stage maximum variation sampling in health promotion programs’ evaluation. Journal of Preventive Medicine, 15, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. J. (1994). Tax and government policy implications for corporate foundation giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(1), 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbel, J. D., & Carter, S. M. (2002). The CEO’s influence on corporate foundation giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhues, M., & Einwiller, S. (2006). Corporate foundations: Their role for corporate social responsibility. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(2), 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Swen, S., Roza, L., Meijs, L., Maas, A. (2020). Nonprofit Organizations’ Views on Corporate Foundations. In: Roza, L., Bethmann, S., Meijs, L., von Schnurbein, G. (eds) Handbook on Corporate Foundations. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25759-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25759-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25758-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25759-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics