Skip to main content

Inception and ResNet: Same Training, Same Features

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2019 (BICA 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 948))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the dominant technology in computer vision today. Unfortunately, it’s not clear how different from each other the best CNNs really are. This paper measures the similarity between two well-known CNNs, Inception and ResNet, in terms of the features they extract from images. We find that Inception’s features can be well approximated as an affine transformation of ResNet’s features and vice-versa.

The similarity between Inception and ResNet features is surprising. Convolutional neural networks learn complex non-linear features of images, and the architectural differences between the systems suggest that these functions should take different forms. Instead, they seem to have converged on similar solutions. This suggests that the selection of the training set may be more important than the selection of the convolutional architecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bau D, Zhou B, Khosla A, Oliva A, Torralba A (2017) Network dissection: quantifying interpretability of deep visual representations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 6541–6549

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dosovitskiy A, Brox T (2016) Inverting visual representations with convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 4829–4837

    Google Scholar 

  3. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770–778

    Google Scholar 

  4. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In: European conference on computer vision. Springer, pp 630–645 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167

  6. Kornblith S, Shlens, J, Le QV (2018) Do better imagenet models transfer better? arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.08974

  7. Lenc K, Vedaldi A (2019) Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalence. Int J Comput Vis 127(5):456–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-018-1098-y

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J, Satheesh S, Ma S, Huang Z, Karpathy A, Khosla A, Bernstein M et al (2015) Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vis 115(3):211–252

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Silberman N, Guadarrama S (2016) Tensorflow-slim image classification model library. https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/research/slim

  10. Szegedy C, Ioffe S, Vanhoucke V, Alemi AA (2017) Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In: Thirty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  12. Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z (2016) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2818–2826

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. McNeely-White .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

McNeely-White, D.G., Beveridge, J.R., Draper, B.A. (2020). Inception and ResNet: Same Training, Same Features. In: Samsonovich, A. (eds) Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2019. BICA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 948. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25719-4_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics