Skip to main content

Adding Organizational Reasoning to Agent-Based Simulations in GAMA

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Multi-Agent Systems (EMAS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11375))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The GAMA platform supports simulation with a bottom-up design from an agent perspective using a BDI framework. This chapter proposes a design for implementing the AORTA framework for organizational reasoning in the GAMA platform to support combining a bottom-up BDI model with a top-down organizational model. In doing so also we contribute towards maturing organizational reasoning for engineering multi-agent systems. The contribution is twofold: an operational semantics of the BDI framework in the GAMA platform, and an extension of it with operational semantics of AORTA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Larsen, J.B.: Agent programming languages and logics in agent-based simulation. In: Sieminski, A., Kozierkiewicz, A., Nunez, M., Ha, Q.T. (eds.) Modern Approaches for Intelligent Information and Database Systems. SCI, vol. 769, pp. 517–526. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76081-0_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Taillandier, P., Bourgais, M., Caillou, P., Adam, C., Gaudou, B.: A BDI agent architecture for the GAMA modeling and simulation platform. In: Nardin, L.G., Antunes, L. (eds.) MABS 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10399, pp. 3–23. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67477-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Caillou, P., Gaudou, B., Grignard, A., Truong, C.Q., Taillandier, P.: A simple-to-use BDI architecture for agent-based modeling and simulation. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 528, 15–28 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shoham, Y.: Agent-oriented programming. Artif. Intell. 60(1), 51–92 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents - theory and practice. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 10(2), 115–152 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University (2004). SIKS Dissertation Series 2004-1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen, A.S., Dignum, V., Villadsen, J.: A framework for organization-aware agents. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 31(3), 387–422 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Larsen, J.B., Villadsen, J.: An approach for hospital planning with multi-agent organizations. In: Polkowski, L., et al. (eds.) IJCRS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10314, pp. 454–465. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60840-2_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Mascardi, V., Weyns, D., Ricci, A.: Engineering multi-agent systems: State of affairs and the road ahead. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 44(1), 18–28 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling. Addressing Complexity of Cognitive, Affective and Social Interactions. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45213-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Wal, C.N., Formolo, D., Robinson, M.A., Minkov, M., Bosse, T.: Simulating crowd evacuation with socio-cultural, cognitive, and emotional elements. In: Mercik, J. (ed.) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXVII. LNCS, vol. 10480, pp. 139–177. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70647-4_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Formolo, D., Van Ments, L., Treur, J.: A computational model to simulate development and recovery of traumatised patients. Biologically Inspired Cogn. Architectures 21, 26–36 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: Developing organised multiagent systems using the MOISE+ model: programming issues at the system and agent levels. Int. J. Agent-Oriented Softw. Eng. 1(3/4), 370–395 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hübner, J.F., Boissier, O., Kitio, R., Ricci, A.: Instrumenting multi-agent organisations with organisational artifacts and agents: giving the organisational power back to the agents. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 20(3), 369–400 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jensen, A.S., Dignum, V., Villadsen, J.: The AORTA architecture: integrating organizational reasoning in Jason. In: Dalpiaz, F., Dix, J., van Riemsdijk, M.B. (eds.) EMAS 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8758, pp. 127–145. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14484-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Deljoo, A., van Engers, T., van Doesburg, R., Gommans, L., de Laat, C.: A normative agent-based model for sharing data in secure trustworthy digital market places. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence ICAART, vol. 1, pp. 290–296. SciTePress (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jager, W., Janssen, M.: An updated conceptual framework for integrated modeling of human decision making: the Consumat II. In: European Conference of Complex Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ghorbani, A., Bots, P., Dignum, V., Dijkema, G.: MAIA: a framework for developing agent-based social simulations. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 16(2), 1–15 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Larsen, J.B., Dignum, V., Villadsen, J., Dignum, F.: Querying social practices in hospital context. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence ICAART, vol. 2, pp. 405–412. SciTePress (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siebers, P.O., Macal, C.M., Garnett, J., Buxton, D., Pidd, M.: Discrete-event simulation is dead, long live agent-based simulation! J. Simul. 4(3), 204–210 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, Z., Rexachs, D., Luque, E., Epelde, F., Cabrera, E.: Simulating the micro-level behavior of emergency department for macro-level features prediction. In: Winter Simulation Conference 2015, pp. 171–182. IEEE Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the Industrial PhD project Hospital Staff Planning with Multi-Agent Goals between PDC A/S and Technical University of Denmark. We would also like to thank Jørgen Villadsen for comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Bruntse Larsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Larsen, J.B. (2019). Adding Organizational Reasoning to Agent-Based Simulations in GAMA. In: Weyns, D., Mascardi, V., Ricci, A. (eds) Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. EMAS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11375. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25693-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25693-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25692-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25693-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics