Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Here to There: Mapping the Metropolitan Politics of Policy Mobilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance

Abstract

This chapter investigates the mechanisms and channels of movements of governance elements between metropolitan regions. It will do this by examining various professional networks, and policy and expert communities. The aim is to investigate to what extent cities and regions which are members of these policy networks and communities have actively facilitated the transfer of procedural and institutional elements of metropolitan planning and governance to/from metropolitan regions. Besides focusing on the mechanisms and channels, the rationale and interests of those policymakers and planning professionals involved are of primary importance. As such, this chapter explores the challenges, limits and opportunities of the mutation and transfer of such elements of metropolitan planning and governance. It will also reveal knowledge about which policies and ideas travel—or not—and why.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    DiMaggio and Powell (1983) use ‘isomorphism’ to describe the result of an evolutionary process of organisational change in the field of organisations (such as enterprises, universities and local governments) that gets more alike through imitation or coercion.

  2. 2.

    See, for instance, the executive masters Innovative Governance of Large Urban Systems (IGLUS) at Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, ‘Cities are back in town’ at Science Po Urban School, Paris, or the programme simply called ‘Cities’ at the London School of Economics.

References

  • Ahrend, R., & Schumann, A. (2014). Approaches to metropolitan area governance: A country overview. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2014/03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrend, R., Gamper, C., & Schumann, A. (2014). The OECD metropolitan governance survey: A quantitative description of governance structures in large urban agglomerations. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2014/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R., & Rossignolo, C. (2010). Cities and the ‘soft side’ of Europeanization: The role of urban networks. In A. Hamedinger, & A. Wolffhardt (Eds.), The Europeanization of cities, urban change and urban networks (pp. 193–206). Amsterdam: Techne Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béal, V., Renaud, E., & Pinson, G. (2018). Networked cities and steering states: Urban policy circulations and the reshaping of state-cities relationships in France. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(5), 796–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2012). Policy transfer research: Still evolving, not yet through? Political Studies Review, 10(3), 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A., Kemmerzell, J., Knodt, M., & Tews, A. (2015). The trans-local dimension of local climate policy: Sustaining and transforming local knowledge orders through trans-local action in three German cities. Urban Research & Practice, 8(3), 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, J. (2006). Geographic scale and functional scope in metropolitan governance reform: Theory and evidence from Germany. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), 121–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bok, R., & Coe, N. (2017). Geographies of policy knowledge: The state and corporate dimensions of contemporary policy mobilities. Cities, 63(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2009). Open questions on state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2(1), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caponio, T. (2018). Immigrant integration beyond national policies? Italian cities’ participation in European city networks. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(12), 2053–2069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Città Metropolitana di Firenze. (2016). Verso un sistema di governance metropolitano: il modello Lione [Towards a metropolitan governance system: The Lyon model]. Florence: Città Metropolitana di Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making. Governance, 13(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2019). International policy transfer: Between the global and sovereign and between the global and local. In D. Stone, & K. Moloney (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, C. (2020a). The European dimension of metropolitan policies: Policy learning and reframing of metropolitan regions. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, C. (2020b). Implications of metropolitan policy mobility: Tracing the relevance of travelling ideas for metropolitan regions. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 115–130). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galland, D., & Harrison, J. (2020). Conceptualising metropolitan regions: How institutions, policies, spatial imaginaries and planning are influencing metropolitan development. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 1–21). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakelberg, L. (2014). Governance by diffusion: Transnational municipal networks and the spread of local climate strategies in Europe. Global Environmental Politics, 14(1), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. (2016). English devolution: Learning lessons from international models of subnational governance. Research report for Local Government Association. https://www.local.gov.uk/english-devolution-learning-lessons-international-models-sub-national-governance. Acceded March 13, 2019.

  • Hartley, J., & Allison, M. (2002). Good, better, best? Inter-organizational learning in a network of local authorities. Public Management Review, 4(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H., & Niederhafner, S. (2005). Cities and organized interest intermediation in the EU multi-level system. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinelt, H., & Kübler, D. (Eds.). (2005). Metropolitan governance: Capacity, democracy and the dynamics of place. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPSP [International Panel on Social Progress]. (2018). Rethinking society for the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy research. Policy Studies Review, 1(2), 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008). State power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiner, M., & Arley, K. (2007). Transnational city networks for sustainability. European Planning Studies, 15(10), 1369–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2010). City typology as the basis for policy: Towards a tailor-made approach to the benchmarking and monitoring of the energy and climate policy of cities. Amstelveen: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaeye, A., & Sauer, T. (2013). City networks and the socio-ecological transition: A European inventory. WWWforEurope Working Paper 27. Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovering, J. (1999). Theory led by policy: The inadequacies of the ‘new regionalism’ (illustrated from the case of Wales). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lütz, S. (2007). Policy-transfer und policy-diffusion [Policy transfer and policy diffusion]. In A. Benz, & N. Dose (Eds.), Handbuch governance [Handbook of governance] (pp. 132–143). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M., & Agranoff, R. (2011). The limitations of public management networks. Public Administration, 89(2), 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. F. (2001). Prospects for regional governance under the new regionalism: Economic imperatives versus political impediments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(5), 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Governing the city. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). OECD territorial reviews: The metropolitan region of Rotterdam-The Hague, Netherlands. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Payre, R. (2010). The importance of being connected: City networks and urban government—Lyon and Eurocities (1990–2005). International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(2), 260–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: from transfer-diffusion to mobility mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12(3), 295–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • PwC. (2016). Cities of opportunity. New York: PwC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, E., & Brill, F. (2018). The global politics of an urban age: creating ‘cities for all’ in the age of financialisation. Palgrave Communications, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0056-6.

  • Schmitt, P. (2020). Learning from elsewhere? A critical account on the mobilisation of metropolitan policies. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 77–93). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens. (2009). Sustainable urban infrastructures. Munich: Siemens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens. (2011). German green city index. Munich: Siemens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens. (2018). Toolkit for resilient cities. Munich: Siemens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(4), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straßheim, H. (2011). Netzwerkpolitik: Governance und Wissen im Administrativen Austausch [Network policy: Governance and knowledge in administrative exchange]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßheim, H. (2013). Vernetzung als lokale Krisenstrategie? Perspektiven der interpretativen Governance- und Verwaltungsforschung [Networking as a local crisis strategy? Perspectives of interpretive governance and administration research]. In M. Haus, & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Lokale Politik und Verwaltung im Zeichen der Krise? [Local politics and administration in the sign of the crisis?] (pp. 121–138). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodore, N., & Peck, J. (2011). Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating ‘commonsense’ urban policy across the OECD zone. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(1), 20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban Institute. (2018). Institutionalizing urban resilience: A midterm monitoring and evaluation report of 100 Resilient Cities. Washington DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dortmund Technical University, Dortmund, Germany

    Karsten Zimmermann

Authors
  1. Karsten Zimmermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten Zimmermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

    Karsten Zimmermann

  2. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ã…s, Norway

    Daniel Galland

  3. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

    John Harrison

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zimmermann, K. (2020). From Here to There: Mapping the Metropolitan Politics of Policy Mobilities. In: Zimmermann, K., Galland, D., Harrison, J. (eds) Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation