Abstract
This concluding chapter argues for a new role of planning in shaping metropolitan futures and reflects on the value of the book’s thematic-temporal-phronetic (TTP) framework—a meso-level approach to better understand the dynamics of contemporary metropolitan change. We begin by revealing the extent to which institutions, policies, spatial imaginaries and planning are influencing metropolitan development through a synthesis of the key outcomes emanating from the totality of the book contributions. The chapter then returns to the TTP framework to reflect on its tripartite rationale as well as its significance to international comparative research. Set against this context, the chapter then identifies four sets of issues that seem highly relevant to both shape future styles of governance and planning, and provide metropolitan regions with modes of working that could make a difference. We finally conclude with three open propositions relating to thematic, temporal and phronetic priorities for future research targeting the planning and governance of metropolitan regions.
Keywords
- TTP framework
- City futures
- Regional futures
- Agile planning
- Metropolitan regions
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options

References
Ammann, C., & Förster, T. (Eds.). (2019). African cities and the development conundrum. Leiden: Brill Open.
Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Borraz, O., & Le Galès, P. (2010). Urban governance in Europe: The government of what? Pôle Sud, 32(1), 137–151.
Davidson, M., & Ward, K. (Eds.). (2018). Cities under austerity: Restructuring the US metropolis. Albany: SUNY Press.
Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2016). The city-region chimera: The political economy of metagovernance failure in Britain. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(2), 371–389.
Etherington, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Re-stating the post-political: Depoliticization, social inequalities, and city-region growth. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(1), 51–72.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E., & Daley, P. (Eds.). (2019). Routledge handbook of South-South relations. London: Routledge.
Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freestone, R., & Amati, M. (Eds.). (2014). Exhibitions and the development of modern planning culture. London: Ashgate.
Friedmann, J., & Sorensen, A. (2019). City unbound: Emerging mega-conurbations in Asia. International Planning Studies, 24(1), 1–12.
Galland, D., & Elinbaum, P. (Eds.). (2018). A ‘field’ under construction: The state of planning in Latin America and the southern turn in planning. disP—The Planning Review, 54(1), 18–54.
Galland, D., & Harrison, J. (2020). Conceptualising metropolitan regions: How institutions, policies, spatial imaginaries and planning are influencing metropolitan development. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp. 1–21). Berlin: Springer.
Gross, J. S., Gualini, E., & Ye, L. (2019). Constructing metropolitan space. Actors, policies and processes of rescaling metropolises. London: Routledge.
Hall, P. (2014). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design since 1880 (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Harrison, J., Fedeli, V., & Feiertag, P. (2020). Imagining the evolving spatiality of metropolitan regions. In K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, & J. Harrison (Eds.), Metropolitan regions, planning and governance (pp.133–151). Berlin: Springer.
Jones, M. (2019). Cities and regions in crisis: The political economy of sub-national economic development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Katz, B., & Bradley, J. (2013). The metropolitan revolution: How cities and metros are fixing our broken politics and fragile economy. New York: Brookings Institution Press.
Kovacic, Z. (2019). Governing informality through representation: Examples from slum policies in Brazil and South Africa. Cities https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.009.
Lawhon, M., Silver, J., Ernstson, H., & Pierce. J. (2016). Unlearning (un)located ideas in the provincialization of urban theory. Regional Studies, 50(9), 1611–1622.
McLoughlin, J. B. (1969). Urban and regional planning: A systems approach. London: Faber and Faber.
OECD. (2015a). The metropolitan century: Understanding urbanisation and its consequences. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015b). Governing the city. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Oosterlynck, S., Beeckmans, L., Bassens, D., Derudder, B., Segaert, B., & Braeckmans, L. (Eds.). (2019). The city as a global political actor. London: Routledge.
Paasi, A. (2008). Is the world more complex than our theories of it? TPSN and the perpetual challenge of conceptualization. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 405–410.
Peck, J. (2016). Economic rationality meets celebrity urbanology: Exploring Edward Glaeser’s city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 1–30.
Peck, J. (2017a). Transatlantic city, part 1: Conjunctural urbanism. Urban Studies, 54(1), 4–30.
Peck, J. (2017b). Transatlantic city, part 2: Late entrepreneurialism. Urban Studies, 54(2), 327–363.
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209.
Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38.
Tewdwr-Jones, M., Sookhoo, D., & Freestone, R. (2019). From Geddes’ city museum to Farrell’s urban room: Past, present, and future at the Newcastle City Futures exhibition. Planning Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2019.1570475.
Tomlinson, R., & Harrison, P. (2018). Knowledge of metropolitan governance in the South. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(6), 1127–1139.
Watson, V. (2016). Locating planning in the new urban Agenda of the urban sustainable development goal. Planning Theory, 15(4), 435–448.
Wheeler, S. (2015). Five reasons why megaregional planning works against sustainability. In J. Harrison, & M. Hoyler (Eds.), Megaregions: Globalization’s new urban form? (pp. 97–118). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galland, D., Harrison, J., Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2020). What Is Metropolitan Planning and Governance for?. In: Zimmermann, K., Galland, D., Harrison, J. (eds) Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25631-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25632-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)