Advertisement

Designing Technologies for Neurodiverse Users: Considerations from Research Practice

  • Vivian Genaro MottiEmail author
  • Anna Evmenova
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1018)

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses the perspectives of ten investigators experienced with design of technologies for and with neurodiverse users. Although the advances on emerging technologies improved their potential to assist users with neurodiverse needs, existing methods for participatory design, usability tests and evaluation have been created for, and validated with, able-bodied users. User-centered design methods are not always well-suited to meet the unique needs of neurodiverse individuals. Therefore, to involve neurodiverse users iteratively in the design process, investigators need to adapt traditional methods from HCI to successfully conduct user studies. Through an online questionnaire, we identified the experimental designs commonly adopted and the major problems investigators face during recruitment, data collection, analysis and design. Based on the analysis of the investigators’ experiences, we provide nine recommendations to conduct studies with neurodiverse users, aiming at engaging them as active participants front and center in the research and design process.

Keywords

Accessibility Inclusive design Assistive technologies Neurodiverse users 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all the respondents of the survey who contributed to this study sharing their experiences and recommendations.

References

  1. 1.
    Brosnan, M., Holt, S., Yuill, N., Good, J., Parsons, S.: Beyond autism and technology: lessons from neurodiverse populations. J. Enabl. Technol. 11(2), 43–48 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benton, L., Vasalou, A., Khaled, R., Johnson, H., Gooch, D.: Diversity for design: a framework for involving neurodiverse children in the technology design process. In: Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3747–3756. ACM, April 2014Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Evmenova, A.S., Graff, H.J., Genaro Motti, V., Giwa-Lawal, K., Zheng, H.: Designing a wearable technology intervention to support young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in inclusive postsecondary academic environments. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 34(2), 92–105 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418795833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zheng, H., Genaro Motti, V.: Assisting students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in inclusive education with smartwatches. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 350. ACM, April 2018Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Britto, T., Pizzolato, E.: Towards web accessibility guidelines of interaction and interface design for people with autism spectrum disorder. In: ACHI 2016: The Ninth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pp. 1–7 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benssassi, E.M., Gomez, J.C., Boyd, L.E., Hayes, G.R., Ye, J.: Wearable assistive technologies for autism: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 17(2), 11–21 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frauenberger, C.: Disability and technology: a critical realist perspective. In: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 89–96). ACM, October 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frauenberger, C., Spiel, K., Makhaeva, J.: Thinking outsideTheBox-designing smart things with autistic children. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 35(8), 666–678 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fage, C.: An emotion regulation app for school inclusion of children with ASD: design principles and preliminary results for its evaluation. ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 112, 8–15 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hansen, A.K., Hansen, E.R., Hall, T., Fixler, M., Harlow, D.: Fidgeting with fabrication: students with ADHD making tools to focus. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education, p. 13. ACM, October 2017Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mercado, J., Espinosa-Curiel, I., Escobedo, L., Tentori, M.: Developing and evaluating a BCI video game for neurofeedback training: the case of autism. Multimed. Tools Appl. 1–38 (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boyd, L.E., Day, K., Stewart, N., Abdo, K., Lamkin, K., Linstead, E.: Leveling the playing field: supporting neurodiversity via virtual realities. Technol Innov. 20(1–2), 105–116 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.21300/20.1-2.2018.105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sobel, K., Rector, K., Evans, S., Kientz, J.A.: Incloodle: evaluating an interactive application for young children with mixed abilities. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 165–176. ACM, May 2016Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kraus, L., Lauer, E., Coleman, R., Houtenville, A.: 2017 Disability statistics annual report. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Volgenau School of EngineeringGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.College of Education and Human DevelopmentGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations