Designing Technologies for Neurodiverse Users: Considerations from Research Practice
This paper presents and discusses the perspectives of ten investigators experienced with design of technologies for and with neurodiverse users. Although the advances on emerging technologies improved their potential to assist users with neurodiverse needs, existing methods for participatory design, usability tests and evaluation have been created for, and validated with, able-bodied users. User-centered design methods are not always well-suited to meet the unique needs of neurodiverse individuals. Therefore, to involve neurodiverse users iteratively in the design process, investigators need to adapt traditional methods from HCI to successfully conduct user studies. Through an online questionnaire, we identified the experimental designs commonly adopted and the major problems investigators face during recruitment, data collection, analysis and design. Based on the analysis of the investigators’ experiences, we provide nine recommendations to conduct studies with neurodiverse users, aiming at engaging them as active participants front and center in the research and design process.
KeywordsAccessibility Inclusive design Assistive technologies Neurodiverse users
We thank all the respondents of the survey who contributed to this study sharing their experiences and recommendations.
- 2.Benton, L., Vasalou, A., Khaled, R., Johnson, H., Gooch, D.: Diversity for design: a framework for involving neurodiverse children in the technology design process. In: Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3747–3756. ACM, April 2014Google Scholar
- 3.Evmenova, A.S., Graff, H.J., Genaro Motti, V., Giwa-Lawal, K., Zheng, H.: Designing a wearable technology intervention to support young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in inclusive postsecondary academic environments. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 34(2), 92–105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418795833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Zheng, H., Genaro Motti, V.: Assisting students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in inclusive education with smartwatches. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 350. ACM, April 2018Google Scholar
- 5.Britto, T., Pizzolato, E.: Towards web accessibility guidelines of interaction and interface design for people with autism spectrum disorder. In: ACHI 2016: The Ninth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, pp. 1–7 (2016)Google Scholar
- 7.Frauenberger, C.: Disability and technology: a critical realist perspective. In: Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 89–96). ACM, October 2015Google Scholar
- 10.Hansen, A.K., Hansen, E.R., Hall, T., Fixler, M., Harlow, D.: Fidgeting with fabrication: students with ADHD making tools to focus. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education, p. 13. ACM, October 2017Google Scholar
- 11.Mercado, J., Espinosa-Curiel, I., Escobedo, L., Tentori, M.: Developing and evaluating a BCI video game for neurofeedback training: the case of autism. Multimed. Tools Appl. 1–38 (2018)Google Scholar
- 13.Sobel, K., Rector, K., Evans, S., Kientz, J.A.: Incloodle: evaluating an interactive application for young children with mixed abilities. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 165–176. ACM, May 2016Google Scholar
- 14.Kraus, L., Lauer, E., Coleman, R., Houtenville, A.: 2017 Disability statistics annual report. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (2018)Google Scholar