Skip to main content

Developing a Typology of Biodiversity Offsets Using an Internet and Expert Based Approach: Methods and Materials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biodiversity Offsets Between Regulation and Voluntary Commitment
  • 386 Accesses

Abstract

Despite their increasing recognition in selected public discourses, biodiversity offsets remain a highly specific subject in expert circles in various locations worldwide. However, these circles are increasingly connected and exchanging, in particular using information and communication technologies online. Therefore, an expert and Internet based research approach was chosen for this study. It follows a netnographic approach in terms of an “offering strategy” to start an interaction and to engage others in a research process. For this purpose, the “Biodiversity Offsets Blog” was created. It served as a content management system to store, structure, and comment information, and it provided the base for a personal learning network, together with exploratory qualified Internet research using the Google search engine as well as chosen social network sites (LinkedIn, ResearchGate, and Twitter) and online curation services (Scoop.it).

In research practice, the process of typification often follows simplified methodologies or is implicitly carried out (intuitive types). By contrast, this study explicitly reflects the process of how types are built. Building on the method of empirically grounded typification, this study consists of an extensive theoretical analysis of voluntariness and biodiversity offsets. This is empirically underlined by two consecutive steps: (1) a screening of potential biodiversity offsets cases and (after grouping these cases to the built types) and (2) illustrative case studies for each of the built types. Due to the exploratory nature of the study, both the screening and the choice of illustrative case studies built on maximum variation, i.e., a spatially and functionally diverse set of cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This observation refers to offsets at global scale. Notwithstanding, there are single offset schemes with a long tradition and numerous projects implemented, e.g., US Wetland Mitigation and German Impact Mitigation.

  2. 2.

    According to Silverman (2006, cited in Earl et al. 2010), document review involves systematic categorization of information into either predetermined or emergent themes.

References

  • Barton AH (1955) The concept of property-space in social research. In: Lazarsfeld PF, Rosenberg M (eds) The language of social research. Free, New York, pp 40–53

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2008) Finding ways to offset private sector impacts on biodiversity. Presented as part of the BirdLife State of the world’s birds website. Available at http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/sowb/casestudy/206. Checked 24/02/2016

  • Bohnsack R (2007) Typenbildung, Generalisierung und komparative Analyse: Grundprinzipien der dokumentarischen Methode. In: Bohnsack R, Nentwig-Gesemann I, Nohl A-M (eds) Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp 225–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsten M, Herma H (2015) Internetbasierte Daten als sprachsoziologische Rätsel. In: Schirmer D, Sander N, Wenninger A (eds) Die qualitative Analyse internetbasierter Daten. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 199–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbi M, Ohlenburg H, Herberg A, Wende W (2010) Impact mitigation and biodiversity offsets-compensation approaches from around the world: a study on the application of Article 14 of the CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). BfN-Schr.-Vertrieb im Landwirtschaftsverl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl G, Curtis A, Allan C (2010) Towards a duty of care for biodiversity. Environ Manag (4):682–696

    Google Scholar 

  • FERN (n.d.) Biodiversity offsetting. Available at http://www.fern.org/campaign/biodiversity-offsetting

  • Flick U, Kardorff EV, Steinke I (2000) Qualitative forschung. Ein Handbuch, vol 337. Rowohlt, Reinbek

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R (2014) Is biodiversity offsetting just a tool for the elite to extract more wealth from natural resources? LinkedIn discussion. Available at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/3667510/3667510-5829721851814776836

  • Hempel CG, Oppenheim P (1936) Der Typusbegriff im Lichte der neuen Logik. Wissenschaftstheoretische Untersuchungen zur Konstitutionsforschung u. Psychologie. Sijthoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge S (1999) Empirisch begründete Typenbildung. Zur Konstruktion von Typen und Typologien in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Leske + Budrich, Opladen

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets RV (2010) Netnography. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld PF (1937) Some remarks on the typological procedures in social research. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6(1):119–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot G (2014) The pricing of everything. Available at http://www.monbiot.com/2014/07/24/the-pricing-of-everything/

  • Müller R, Plieninger J, Rapp C (2013) Recherche 2.0: Finden und Weiterverarbeiten in Studium und Beruf. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwich M (2003) Cyberscience: research in the age of the internet. Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Vienna, pp 479–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwich M, König R (2012) Cyberscience 2.0: research in the age of digital social networks, vol 11. Campus, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen M (2012) Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonprobability sampling (n.d.) Wikipedia. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonprobability_sampling

  • Purposive sampling (2012) Laerd dissertation. Available at http://dissertation.laerd.com/purposive-sampling.php

  • Schirmer D, Sander N, Wenninger A (eds) (2015) Die Qualitative Analyse internetbasierter Daten: Methodische Herausforderungen und Potenziale von Online-Medien. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz A (1932) Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie. Springer, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Science 2.0 (n.d.) Wikipedia. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_2.0

  • Srubar I (1979) Die Theorie der Typenbildung bei Alfred Schütz. Ihre Bedeutung und ihre Grenzen

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich CG, Schiek D (2015) Forumsdiskussionen im Internet als reaktives Instrument der Datenerhebung. Ein Werkstattbericht. In: Schirmer D, Sander N, Wenninger A (eds) Die qualitative Analyse internetbasierter Daten. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 133–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenninger A (2015) Hermeneutische Analysen neuer Kommunikationsformen im Internet. In: Schirmer D, Sander N, Wenninger A (eds) Die qualitative Analyse internetbasierter Daten. Soziologische Entdeckungen. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Darbi, M. (2020). Developing a Typology of Biodiversity Offsets Using an Internet and Expert Based Approach: Methods and Materials. In: Biodiversity Offsets Between Regulation and Voluntary Commitment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25594-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics