Skip to main content

Management of the Unstable Patient During EVTM and REBOA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endovascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management

Part of the book series: Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma ((HTACST))

  • 838 Accesses

Abstract

Most trauma patients who require Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) will be cardiovascularly “unstable”—whatever that means. The term is typically used to describe a physiological state characterized by hypotension, hypoperfusion, and tachycardia, often—but not invariably—brought on by blood loss. REBOA is used as part of a damage control resuscitation approach, when blood loss has reached critical levels, to obtain temporary hemorrhage control, while hemostatic resuscitation is instituted. Understanding the physiological consequences of REBOA, and the relationship between anesthesia and aortic occlusion, is therefore critically important. Experience with the intra-operative and anesthetic management of REBOA patients is still limited. Nevertheless, there are a number of key principles which, if adhered to, will help anesthesiologists and surgeons manage these complex and demanding patients. This chapter discusses a number of issues, including communication, crew resource management, timing of REBOA, circulatory access, induction and maintenance of anesthesia, analgesia, hemostatic resuscitation, afterload reduction, monitoring, electrolyte management, and balloon deflation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lallemand MS, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for major abdominal venous injury in a porcine hemorrhagic shock model. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(2):230–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Morrison JJ, et al. The inflammatory sequelae of aortic balloon occlusion in hemorrhagic shock. J Surg Res. 2014;191(2):423–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scherzer D, et al. Pro-con debate: etomidate or ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2012;17(2):142–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeiler FA, et al. The ketamine effect on ICP in traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(1):163–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Komatsu R, et al. Anesthetic induction with etomidate, rather than propofol, is associated with increased 30-day mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(6):1329–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Price B, et al. Hemodynamic consequences of ketamine vs etomidate for endotracheal intubation in the air medical setting. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(7):1124–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Upchurch CP, et al. Comparison of etomidate and ketamine for induction during rapid sequence intubation of adult trauma patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;69(1):24–33 e22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sikorski RA, et al. Choice of general anesthetics for trauma patients. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2014;4(3):225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gelman S. The pathophysiology of aortic cross-clamping and unclamping. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(4):1026–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson MA, et al. Small changes, big effects: the hemodynamics of partial and complete aortic occlusion to inform next generation resuscitation techniques and technologies. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6):1106–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kragh JF Jr, Jones JA, Walters TJ, Baer DG, Wade CE, Holcomb JB, et al. Battle casualty survival with emergency tourniquet use to stop limb bleeding. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(6):590–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.07.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morrison JJ, Rasmussen TE. Noncompressible torso hemorrhage: a review with contemporary definitions and management strategies. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(4):843–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2012.05.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Qasim Z, Brenner M, Menaker J, Scalea T. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. Resuscitation. 2015;96:275–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan O. Jansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Experts’ Comments by Luca Ansaloni and Federico Coccolini

Experts’ Comments by Luca Ansaloni and Federico Coccolini

Traumatic torso hemorrhage (TTH) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the field of trauma and emergency medicine and surgery [11, 12]. In recent times, there has been a renewed interest in the adoption of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in association with the Endovascular resuscitation and Trauma Management (EVTM) approach for patients who present with TTH [13]. Like all medical interventions and procedures, there are not only benefits, but even risks associated with the REBOA technique. However, in the case of REBOA, these complications are not unanimously agreed upon with varying viewpoints and studies. This chapter aims to indicate the correct management of REBOA placement in hemodynamically unstable patients with TTH, in order to reduce the well-known complications of the REBOA technique at each step of its application. Although REBOA is an emergent and increasingly accepted technique used as a less invasive alternative (than surgical interventions) for controlling bleeding in patients with TTH, in order to allow for this procedure to be used in widespread practice, a better understanding of the potential complications that can arise in all stages (arterial access, balloon positioning, inflation, during occlusion, deflation, and removal of the sheath) must be well recognized. The understanding of the physiology of temporary aortic occlusion, an excellent grade of communication between trauma team members, an integrated management of anesthesia, hemostatic resuscitation and fluid balance during REBOA application (especially during balloon deflation times), and finally an appropriate monitoring of the patients with TTH, can allow identification of specific complications and adequate measures to be taken to avoid these complications and reduce potential morbidity and mortality associated with REBOA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pierce, A., Jansen, J.O. (2020). Management of the Unstable Patient During EVTM and REBOA. In: Hörer, T., DuBose, J., Rasmussen, T., White, J. (eds) Endovascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management . Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25341-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25341-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-25340-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-25341-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics